Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
only for yourself and not for the entire country
I do interpret it for the entire nation.
only for yourself and not for the entire country
oh, i see you're method. if you ban all guns save one single shot musket, you've satisfied the 2nd Amendment. BS.That is because you dont understand that banning all guns is not the same as gun control.
No one is going to ban all guns.
and they are not in line with the constitution. they are wrong, thus invalid and repugnant to the constitution. Hence, Marbury v. Madison applies and all laws repugnant to the constitution are not to be obeyed.The country has determined that gun control laws are prefectly within the countrys laws including the constitution.
That is what this countries laws say.
yes i do. especially since WE THE PEOPLE wrote it.You dont get to interpret the constitution.
I am right.You are wrong.
This country has never and will never depend on YOUR interpitation fo the constiutution.
You dont get to deside for all of us how it is interpreted.
Banning all guns and gun control laws are not the same thing you fool.
The Scotus did not say guns could be banned outright.
It is against the constitution right now.
Right now?
NO one is going to ban guns outright.
I would take up arms with you if the Scotus desided it that way as would the vast majority of Americnas.
You dont get to deside what the constitution says.
But you do not have the right to order the rest of us to follow YOUR interpretation now do you?
tell us just how that is?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
during the Marshall Court (1801–1836), which declared the Court to be the supreme arbiter of the Constitution (see Marbury v. Madison) and made several important rulings which gave shape and substance to the constitutional balance of power between the federal government (referred to at the time as the "general government") and the states.