DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Another brilliant post from Dixie! Keep em comin!
How ironic with your comrade.
Pinheads Frustrated Cons Aren't Crawling in Hole!
- Thread starter Dixie - In Memoriam
- Start date
christiefan915
Catalyst
If you stopped using the highlighted words in reference to liberals and you'll see we can be very pleasant and agreeable to deal with. 
Everywhere I turn, I am confronted with angry liberals, who want to call me every name in the book and then some, because I disagree with their socialist agenda. Because Obama is a black man, this somehow gives them the right to call me a racist as well. I really thought, after such a monumental win in November, and this "new day" in America, we would see more pleasantries from the left, but they seem very bitter and angry, still!
I think it is because of frustration. They fully expected, when they won the election, all conservatives would promptly run crawl in a hole... possibly up there in Wyoming somewhere... but that didn't happen. All across America, you have conservatives speaking out against the liberal agenda and socializing of America. You have conservatives holding this administration and joke of a Congress accountable for these left-wing policies out of the Communist Manifesto, and using the minority platform to expose liberals for the general frauds they are, and you pinheads can't stand it. This all frustrates the hell out of you, because you fully expected America to collectively roll over and embrace liberalism after electing Obama!
Didn't happen.
And we have the daily press conferences... we have the daily tax cheat exposed... democrats spend another trillion dollars to line the pockets of their contributors, and life goes on. But why are you so angry, left? You've got everything you wanted, you have complete and unfettered control of Washington, and Republicans can't stop you. Yet, your main concern at the moment, is silencing talk radio. It's not good enough that you won an election and finally garnered enough power and control to implement your socialist agenda, you want to completely silence any and all dissent. It's totalitarian fascism on full display.
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Yes, I know christiefan, if Conservatives would all shut up and stop telling the truth, you wouldn't have any problem with us. I understand you have to do everything in your power to silence us, because implementing your socialist agenda depends on that. To hell with freedom of speech, you'll subvert the constitution if you must. The main thing is, silencing us, or brow beating us down to little John McCain's who fall all over ourselves apologizing to liberals for being conservative.
"From each according to ability, to each according to need." This is the basic mantra articulated by Karl Marx, and the idea behind socialism. It's also the idea behind socialized medicine, and a host of other liberal issues. If you don't like the words I used, you better find a way to explain why all your initiatives follow the mantra of socialism. Oh yeah, I guess you do wish I'd just shut up, and stop shining the light of truth on your agenda. Don't worry, Nancy Pelosi and the other communists you elected, are working very hard on stripping my 1st Amendment rights away, so you can go about implementing socialism in America, without dissent.
"From each according to ability, to each according to need." This is the basic mantra articulated by Karl Marx, and the idea behind socialism. It's also the idea behind socialized medicine, and a host of other liberal issues. If you don't like the words I used, you better find a way to explain why all your initiatives follow the mantra of socialism. Oh yeah, I guess you do wish I'd just shut up, and stop shining the light of truth on your agenda. Don't worry, Nancy Pelosi and the other communists you elected, are working very hard on stripping my 1st Amendment rights away, so you can go about implementing socialism in America, without dissent.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
If you stopped using the highlighted words in reference to liberals and you'll see we can be very pleasant and agreeable to deal with.
So you believe in censorship? How unfortunate for you.
So, if he stopped describing liberals as he sees them acting then you'd be all nice to him?If you stopped using the highlighted words in reference to liberals and you'll see we can be very pleasant and agreeable to deal with.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
You have it wrong Damo. We don't call Dixie names cause he calls liberals names. We do it because he's an insufferable prick.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
In other words, he proves you wrong most of the time.You have it wrong Damo. We don't call Dixie names cause he calls liberals names. We do it because he's an insufferable prick.
christiefan915
Catalyst
No, we'd all be nice(r) to him if he stopped using fallacies in support of his points.
Argumentum ad populum ("appeal to belief", "appeal to the majority", "appeal to the people"): where a proposition is claimed to be true solely because many people believe it to be true
Appeal to spite: a specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made through exploiting people's bitterness or spite towards an opposing party
Judgmental language: insultive or pejorative language to influence the recipient's judgment
Ad hominem: attacking the personal instead of the argument.
Spotlight fallacy: when a person uncritically assumes that all members or cases of a certain class or type are like those that receive the most attention or coverage in the media
You get the point.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
I never use fallacies, only facts.
This is what Liberals do all the time... 95% of their "issues" are poll driven. A fetus is not a human being because it hasn't obtained "personhood" is a good example of argumentum ad populum, PINHEAD!
You mean, like.... it is all George W. Bush's fault, no matter what IT is? Or maybe you mean like Howard Dean's comments about Republicans? Or maybe you mean, like the anti-war left's calling the previous administration every name in the book? Or maybe you mean, like the current Democrat leadership in Congress, pressing for investigation and prosecution of a former administration, something that has NEVER been done in the history of America?
Uhm...are you like, on drugs all the time, or just when you get online?
Again, you apparently need to do a search for my username, and find the endless barrage of threads devoted to vindictive personal adhom attacks on me. Essentially, every thread I present an argument, this is what ultimately happens. I haven't had a legitimate "debate" with a pinhead in months, because they always resort to hurling insults and names at me, when I am being perfectly rational and reasonable with them.
I hate to break this to you, but that is the primary characteristic of a liberal. They assume that all cases are the same, within a certain class. All poor people are poor because they lack opportunity... all rich people are rich because they took advantage of the poor... rich people don't need their money... poor people need more money.... The Democrat Party has been largely successful in waging class warfare, by dividing us into groups... Black people and White people... Wealthy people and Poor people... Fortunate and Less Fortunate... Two Americas... etc.
You get the point.
Was the point to demonstrate what an idiot you are?
TuTu Monroe
A Realist
ROTFLMAO!!
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
Regression fallacy: ascribes cause where none exists.
Cause? What does your apparent censorship have to do with cause? Nice try, but you're a moron.
Again, his opinion is based on his experience, as the opinion of all people are, you tell him to deny his experience in place of the expectation to be treated better.No, we'd all be nice(r) to him if he stopped using fallacies in support of his points.
Argumentum ad populum ("appeal to belief", "appeal to the majority", "appeal to the people"): where a proposition is claimed to be true solely because many people believe it to be true
Appeal to spite: a specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made through exploiting people's bitterness or spite towards an opposing party
Judgmental language: insultive or pejorative language to influence the recipient's judgment
Ad hominem: attacking the personal instead of the argument.
Spotlight fallacy: when a person uncritically assumes that all members or cases of a certain class or type are like those that receive the most attention or coverage in the media
You get the point.
I'm sure you would be treated better in the USSR at the beginning if you constantly told Lenin how right he was, even if it was not your experience, but that doesn't change what Lenin was or did, it solely changed how you were treated.
If his experience shows something different than yours, match it with your own experience. We call that a conversation.
Instead you advised he ignore what he believes he has seen because he would be treated better because of it.
If you believed something to be true, regardless of how you are treated because of it, would you be brave enough to tell that truth to others, or would you just maintain how you are treated is the measure of "truth" and cave to their demands to be told what they want to hear?
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Can you put up where all the media types swooned over Obama's pecs?
No, but they'd allow him to lick their boots and be a token conservative in their army of haters. A silent conservative is a support in their view, but worse are the conservative apologists, of which this forum has a few.
uscitizen
Villified User
Can you put up where all the media types swooned over Obama's pecs?
MSM sucks, it is all to enquireristic in nature.
Perhaps the msm is full of gays? I dunno, but I watch very little of MSM.
Took me a while to figure out who Jack Bauer was when bush spoke of him. pffft.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
I agree they do suck but for a different reason perhaps. The First Amendment guarantees their freedom for a reason, to keep the People informed of shit that the government would rather have us not see. When the press does the bidding for the government, which is obviously happening here, democracy is up shit's creek.