that's asking a bit too much from zap
Because you keep referencing Trump when we were talking about Hillary and integrity. Is Hillary's integrity determined by someone else's?
Is there a quote for the actions Hillary has been taking over the emails? Would two months of activity suffice?
Describe the activity that would indicate she is "fighting that she did nothing wrong"?
Have you stopped following this election over the past two months or just don't think she has done anything wrong thus want a list of all her activities so you can claim there's nothing wrong with them?
I simply have not seen her do anything that is "fighting that she did nothing wrong".
Are you saying that simply running for president is a denial of wrongdoing in the email scandal?
She apologized, admitted a mistake and has continued to run for president.
How is that denying that you did anything wrong?
How is that claiming to not have made a mistake?
I am not voting for trump. I do appreciate some of the theatrics, and I have to acknowledge that you can't stump the trump. But I do not support him. My biggest opposition to him is I am a very huge/fanatical believer in privacy rights, I am against the NSA spying on millions of americans and those that seek to destroy edward snowden, who I consider an american hero. This is one of the greatest threats to our democracy and a free society. Sadly both trump and clinton do not differ on this issue.
But I do love how someone like trump can run an unconventional campaign, be told countless times what he is doing is going to doom him, but he just runs circles around everybody and make liberals cry - he just keeps winning like the nimble navigator he is.
I suggest you try to be more mature and not talk about revoking my rights as a citizen. I also suggest you try to inform yourself of the broader political landscape before going into offendo-tron mode.
How many days you want to predict before this stuff is DoA? What's your over-under?
When you think about it the demalquedacrats of JPP really have no choice but to support the shit show that is Crooked Hillary. They have no where else to go
Yeah, true - only liberals are opposed to Trump.
But it is liberal heads who are exploding with fear.
She keeps saying she did nothing others didn't do. That's a lie. She was the only one to use her own private server. She's a compulsive liar, it's the Clinton way.
A卐卐HatZombie;1623290 said:The globalist inhumans know their days are numbered.
NO, I simply find it funny that an opportunist like Trump would find fault in Warren taking every advantage she could get. In a different context Dangerous Donald would be respecting Warren for being intelligent enough to find a way to exploit the system.
I could say the same about you & Trump, but you're not supporting Trump. Why do you assume that everyone on the left must naturally support Hillary?
She has SOOOOO much more integrity than Dangerous Donald.
Had they nominated JEB, or Kasich, or even Carson... you would have a good point, but in comparison to Dangerous Donald the Con-Artist.... sorry HRC wins every day of the week.
She has some. Not much. I am willing to vote for her because I think the Orange man is dangerous. I think he suffers from a personality disorder (mental illness) and is a very petty small man. I don't what (want) his ego issues to harm the United States. GWB's ego issues harmed us badly and got us into what I call a war of arrogance. His unwillingness to admit a mistake for fear of appearing weak was very harmful to our nation. Dangerous Don suffers the same affliction.
I have heard HRC admit mistakes. I have seen humility in her. She is ruthless and will say almost anything to get elected, but she will also admit to being human and she understands that admitting a mistake is a sign of strength, not weakness.