W
WinterBorn
Guest
depends on which founding father and what that man may have done.
If the man had not broken any laws which founding father do you suppose would have snuck up and shot an unarmed man?
depends on which founding father and what that man may have done.
The end of right-wing conservatism.
Good riddance.
You think the founding fathers would have gone in a church and shot an unarmed man?
Yeah you are trolling.
Some say they were terrorists: http://books.google.com/books?id=CY...q27Bg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10You think the founding fathers would have gone in a church and shot an unarmed man?
Yeah you are trolling.
Correction: The end of a wasted life. Good riddence.
Do you mean the sanctity of life, Mr. Sophisticated?.. further evidence of the ignorance of the "right-to-life" mindfuck in the name of "God."
This has nothing to do with the "santity" of life and absolutely nothing to do with God.
This is all about the fear of genetic annihilation.
Let's cut to the chase.
Do you mean the sanctity of life, Mr. Sophisticated?
If it were about fear of genetic annihilation, black liberals would be the most concerned. *shrug*
Nice dodge at the issue raised. The fact is that the black race in then US was the original target of the pro abortion movement, and it has been incredibly effective. And most of the murderers have been liberal black mothers, murdering their own children.I did indeed mean sanctity.
Score one for you.
Black liberals meld well with all races of people. In fact, given that all humans are genetically African, I'd say they have the least to worry about .. I'm sure you do too.
.. further evidence of the ignorance of the "right-to-life" mindfuck in the name of "God."
This has nothing to do with the "santity" of life and absolutely nothing to do with God.
This is all about the fear of genetic annihilation.
Let's cut to the chase.
In a country where killing innocents is rewarded, normal rules of behavior have broken down. That is the basic argument against abortion and why there can be no compromise.
You are exactly right.I understand the sentiment, but I vehemently disagree. What this nut-job, and he is imo a nut-job, did, was to ruin a forward momentum to make case law with regards to late term abortions and abortion clinic practices. The goal with this case was to make headway into looking into abortion clinic records and auditing their standards as well. Most persons involved on either side understand that this battle NEEDS to be handled via the courts. Vigilanteism harms the cause, breaks the law and sets us back.
If the man had not broken any laws which founding father do you suppose would have snuck up and shot an unarmed man?
That's what he thought.
The founding fathers would never have allowed abortion to be legal so the point is nil.
The founding fathers would never have allowed abortion to be legal so the point is nil.
Well why was he in church as an usher?
With his wife in the choir?
Bullcrap! Abortion existed during the founding fathers time and they made no laws against it.
Bullcrap! Abortion existed during the founding fathers time and they made no laws against it.