Question for conservatives: Why has there never been a female US President?

Popular vote is really just mob rule which is why the electoral college was used. Yes the popular aspect is represented in the portion of electors assigned by house seats held. But the interests of the states are supported by equal seats for each state. Its a good and proper balance.

see how the right now sees elections and democracy


they hate the nation and government the founders left us
 
Politically she was standard, but had HUGE political experience, more than any eight Republican contenders, obviously. She was defeated by some very deliberate last-minute manoeuvres, and still won the vote by three million, so it seems to me that it is the American Establishment as well as the drunken hicks that detests the notion of a woman as Head of State. I should go back to monarchy - we have an excellent one here! :)

I'm not really interested in a monarchy, particularly one where a prominent family member trafficks underage women.

Experience isn't everything. Nixon had plenty of experience, but it didn't work out so well with him.
 
Is this something right-wing Americans say when they collapse in the gutter after a skinful, or what?

It was actually a phrase that a left wing New Zealander made popular (which is funny since New Zealand didn't have a Baby Boom generation).
 
It was a question of whether the electorate or someone else that prevented there being a woman President. Clearly it wasn't the electorate. Our system of voting for House of Commons members isn't representative either, but one wonders whether it is currently important that the States should have equal weight in yours. Doesn't the President represent to population of America now? With us it is genuinely a matter of local representation, which is different.

States have to be represented in addition to the populace at large.
 
Back
Top