AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Leftists had nothing to do with War on Drugs, little boy.
Question for Gun-Cravens: Why Render Law-Abiding Citizens Defenseless?
- Thread starter IBDaMann
- Start date
Leftists had nothing to do with War on Drugs, little boy.
You do know you are citing a source which is a facade for the Crime Prevention Research Center, another source funded by the gun manufacturers, correct?
Like asking the Fox what he would recommend to protect the chicken coop
SmarterthanYou
rebel
every single FACT that is in that publication is backed by real evidence. It completely debunks every anti gun myth you anti freedom fucks like to purvey
Right, “evidence” provided by the Crime Prevention Research Center, aka, gun manufacturers, are you really that naive?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
that and the founding fathers comments clearly show i'm in the right and you're not. the 'evidence' you're dismissing is from numerous sources, some law enforcement, some gov entities, some with no objective other than truth.
whereas YOUR evidence..........well, are you really that naive?
I guess you are
All the gun manufacturers propaganda you are swallowing is based upon cherry picking and reframing facts, even the quotes from the Founding Fathers, you do understand what it means to frame facts, correct?
As I said, it is similar to the Fox recommending how to protect the chicken coup, and your listening to him
SmarterthanYou
rebel
ROFL. do we need to post those 'cherry picked' comments again? those that SPECIFICALLY refer to the 2nd Amendment as an INDIVIDUAL right????? or will you studiously ignore those pesky facts that don't fit your narrative and agenda?
Little history lesson for you, the Founding Fathers were prolific authors, all of them wrote nearly their entire life, and often even criticized and reversed positions they held at different times of their lives. With that much production, it is easy to find a quote or two to support nearly any position you want to believe, and, many of the quotes provided in the gun manufacturers propaganda you swallow have been proven to be bogus
SmarterthanYou
rebel
but it's MORE than just a quote or two. Little history lesson for you......the founding fathers had years of experience dealing with a tyrannical monarch. KNEW that a standing army was a bane to liberty. Had centuries of knowledge about the same. Then, they wrote a declaration and KNEW that the easiest way for the monarchy to force upon them the kings rule was to take their arms and powder. To prevent that, 'shall not be infringed' was written and ratified. and no, not MANY have been proven bogus, only one that i'm aware of. Not to mention that there were many state and federal cases before Heller that specifically denoted that the 2nd Amendment protected an individual right. many presidents in the past have said that. The 1982 US Senate commission confirms that very thing.
That is why I did not respond to it. The Gun manufacturers have made up stats that gun lovers wait for and use. More guns =more deaths. Kids getting killed in school is worth the gun lovers having military weapons. Weapons designed to spray bullets and kill many people in a short time must be enough fun that the deaths do not matter. We are terrifying our children. And gun-lovers simply do not care. https://www.tiktok.com/@kaitlmcb3zn/video/7215740854714125614
We have more gun deaths and more mass shootings year after year. We have children going through active shooter drills and the fears of getting shot up so rightys can have terrible weapons.
We need to get rid of guns.
You should be happy if we take all the guns. You would require almost no self-defense. Your kids could go to school without active shooter drills and many schools becoming war zones. Bars would be safer. Malls and theaters would be safer. You would not have to be armed like Rambo to walk whatever terrifying streets you walk.
Into the Night
Verified User
You don't get to infringe on any weapon by type, manufacturer, color, size of magazine, type of action, or how 'scary' it looks.
You don't get to define what is 'safe enough'.
It is unconstitutional to pass any law that infringes on the right of the people to keep and bear arms (ANY kind of arms), or to infringe on the right of a State to organize a militia.
Into the Night
Verified User
There is no such thing as an 'assault rifle'. It is unconstitutional to pass any law that infringes on the right to keep and bear arms. The 2nd amendment does NOT list any gun by type, manufacturer, type of action, size of magazine, how fast it shoots, color, or how 'scary' it looks. It does not define what is a 'sporting' weapon or that people are limited to a 'sporting' weapon.
It is not poorly written. The right to self defense is inherent.
The 2nd Amendment mentions militias because it is ALSO unconstitutional to infringe on the right of a State to organize a militia. The right of self defense is inherent.
Even morons have the right to keep and bear arms.
State governments have the right to organize a militia. They ARE the government.
You may discard the Constitution, but that does not make it go away.
So...genocide, eh? Do you seriously think you can get away with this without getting shot?
No. Murderers are directly responsible. Democrats are directly responsible for create 'gun free' zones, encouraging such crime. They don't work.
None.
A republic is government by law (a constitution). That constitution is created by the people and ordained by the people to power. A republic cannot exist without it.
Into the Night
Verified User
Paradox. Which is it, dude?
Into the Night
Verified User
So you are just an imagination of someone else? Dutch perhaps?
Into the Night
Verified User
The US is in a league of its own!
Where did all the others go wrong?
Cherry picking fallacy.
Into the Night
Verified User
Try to keep up with the conversation, twit. Answer the question.
Into the Night
Verified User
It is a shame that you are not more useful..it appears that you have the intellectual capacity, but you sadly refuse.