Question for Gun-Cravens: Why Render Law-Abiding Citizens Defenseless?

[Truth Detector]

I am a man, unlike you.

Wrong. You're a cowardly, thread trolling little cunt with a chip on his shoulder. You're a caricature of ignorance and stupidity. Run along punk.

 

[Truth Detector]

Yakety Yak is going to keep repeating it till he actually believes it himself!

Yaks are not the smartest animals on the planet! OOPS!

Absurdity; the last desperate refuge for the ignorant, the dishonest and the stupid.

 

[Truth Detector]

Leftists had nothing to do with War on Drugs, little boy.

Yes, they did you caricature of ignorance, stupidity and dishonesty.

 

[Nordberg]

Gun cravens, such as yourself, mischaracterize the 2nd Amendment as being "poorly written" just because it clearly allows all arms, even the ones at the center of your debilitating phobia.

Find a psychiatrist and get help.

By the way, your term "assault rifle" is just your euphemism for "an inanimate object that appears to me (and my phobia) as really really scary in a debilitating sort of way and that the mere thought of which triggers my irrational panic seizures."

Find a psychiatrist and get help.


Your tyranny is showing. Without even giving it a second thought, you find it perfectly OK to declare for others what their personal requirements are, to include your declarations of what they don't need, determined of course by what you need to assuage your panic seizures.

You mentally fellate yourself like the fucking moron you are. Find a psychiatrist and get help.

You gun-phobics hate militias because, you guessed it, they have several of your little, inanimate seizure-triggers. Your reaction is to declare militias illegal ... because you have severe mental issues that won't go away on their own. We need a totally inclusive purge of every idiot who thinks this way and who won't address his problem with a professional. For a Republic to survive, it requires that not a single one of those fuckwits is still breathing.

The gun-craven cancer must be sent into remission, not afforded humane treatment of loving acceptance. They're entitled only to extinction by the most expedient means available..

School children are murdered as a result of the defenselessness zones created just to minimize the panic seizures of the mentally ill. Those who love children and who want them to remain alive need to say enough is enough and stop allowing our children to be packed into defenselessness zones for the ease of gun-craven fuckwits who won't see a mental health professional.


Gun-cravens will never admit publicly that they will not be able live normal lives until the second Amendment is repealed. They won't ever acknowledge that the problem is on their end, and they are happy to let our children die, nay, orchestrate their brutal deaths through defenselessness zones just to avoid seeing a shrink.

. I saw an argument by
An assault rifle is a specific type of weapon. It is defined. Quit lying. https://www.bradyunited.org/fact-sheets/what-are-assault-weapons-and-high-capacity-magazines I read an argument between a gun nut and people who are against people being shot all over America. The gun nut started arguing about the size and number of screws on the handle proving it was not actually an AR. You guys are flailing in your arguments. 45,000 Americans are shot every year. That is a cost gun lovers are willing for people to pay. That is not just 45000 people, but 45000 families and friends facing an unneeded violent and ugly death. They are adding up and someday. they will stop the guns.

 

[Truth Detector]

Right, “evidence” provided by the Crime Prevention Research Center, aka, gun manufacturers, are you really that naive?

Attacking the source? Are you really that stupid? That was a rhetorical question. Everyone who has seen you post know you're a lying leftist moron.

 

[Truth Detector]

You should be happy if we take all the guns. You would require almost no self-defense. Your kids could go to school without active shooter drills and many schools becoming war zones. Bars would be safer. Malls and theaters would be safer. You would not have to be armed like Rambo to walk whatever terrifying streets you walk.

Try it asshat.

 

[Truth Detector]

It is a shame that you are not more useful..it appears that you have the intellectual capacity, but you sadly refuse.

Projection.

 

[Truth Detector]

I will just wait until you shoot yourself or some family member. Perhaps accidentally. Guns are dangerous in a house. They are dangerous in society.

This is your brain on moron. Don't be a moron.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I will just wait until you shoot yourself or some family member. Perhaps accidentally. Guns are dangerous in a house. They are dangerous in society.

what's the time frame for that expected shooting? because i've had guns in my home since I was the age of 12...........that's 44 years. If guns are dangerous in society, why do let police arm themselves?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

They are adding up and someday. they will stop the guns.

how do they plan on doing that? I'd like to know if they have a plan for overcoming the superiority in numbers and tactics of actual gun experts.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You should be happy if we take all the guns. You would require almost no self-defense. Your kids could go to school without active shooter drills and many schools becoming war zones. Bars would be safer. Malls and theaters would be safer. You would not have to be armed like Rambo to walk whatever terrifying streets you walk.

so your preference is to have women be raped at knifepoint. how many knives do you have and how many women do you plan on raping?

 

[archives]

Attacking the source? Are you really that stupid? That was a rhetorical question. Everyone who has seen you post know you're a lying leftist moron.

Axiom of common sense, if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and walks like a duck, it sure as hell ain’t an elephant regardless of who tells it is

 

[Into the Night]

BUT WE'RE NUMBR ONE!!!!!!!! That's all that natters, right?

Works for me.

Public schools are run locally.

Then what is the NEA for??

In red states, the left doesn't run them.

Blatant lie.

That's why education is so pathetic in red states.
And it truly is.

Conclusion based on a blatant lie.

As for firearms deaths, it's pretty obvious that most of us don't give a shit about them.
They're simply part of being American.

Special pleading fallacy. Bigotry.

The few who can't handle them just make a lot of noise.

So do guns.

 

[Into the Night]

I will just wait until you shoot yourself or some family member. Perhaps accidentally. Guns are dangerous in a house. They are dangerous in society.

Why would he shoot himself? Do you actually believe he is as incompetent with a gun as you are?
Electricity is dangerous in a house. It is dangerous to society.
Plumbing is dangerous in a house. It is dangerous to society.
Computers are dangerous in a house. Computers are dangerous to society.
Cars are dangerous in a house. Cars are dangerous to society.

You mindless twit.

You just try to take guns away. You will not survive the attempt.

 

[Into the Night]

Wait, you think they'll stop at AR-15s?

They might. It depends on how many are killed by AR-15s as they try to take them!

 

[Into the Night]

I saw an argument by

Incomplete sentence. Ignored.

An assault rifle is a specific type of weapon. It is defined. Quit lying.

There is no such thing as an 'assault rifle', no matter how many Holy Links you bring up.

I read an argument between a gun nut and people who are against people being shot all over America. The gun nut started arguing about the size and number of screws on the handle proving it was not actually an AR. You guys are flailing in your arguments.

Writing stories now?

45,000 Americans are shot every year.

Made up number. Argument from randU fallacy.

That is a cost gun lovers are willing for people to pay. That is not just 45000 people, but 45000 families and friends facing an unneeded violent and ugly death.

Conclusion from argument from randU fallacy. Attempted proof by randU. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

They are adding up and someday. they will stop the guns.

How do dead people stop guns??

Gun free zones don't work, dude. You can't take the guns away. You will get shot if you try.

 

[Concart]

that and the founding fathers comments clearly show i'm in the right and you're not. the 'evidence' you're dismissing is from numerous sources, some law enforcement, some gov entities, some with no objective other than truth.

whereas YOUR evidence..........well, are you really that naive?

It doesn't matter how right you think you are about the Constitution. Because you have ZERO power. The courts and the country think you are a fucking moron. Oh, and so do I.

 

[Into the Night]

what's the time frame for that expected shooting? because i've had guns in my home since I was the age of 12...........that's 44 years. If guns are dangerous in society, why do let police arm themselves?

I believe he thinks you are as incompetent with a gun as he is. Remember he owns no gun, doesn't know how to shoot one, doesn't know anything about them, and is afraid of them (hoplophobia).
If he thinks that going out and taking people's guns that have been plinking cans since they were kids (which is how they became excellent shots!) is going to happen without consequence, his own naivete will be to his own death.

He thinks government will do it for him. He doesn't understand that police and army will side with the gun owners and won't attack their own families and community.

He wants a civil war. If he's not careful, he might get what he wants.

 

[Into the Night]

Axiom of common sense,

There is no axiom of a buzzword.

if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and walks like a duck, it sure as hell ain’t an elephant regardless of who tells it is

Cliche fallacy.

 

[Nordberg]

Incomplete sentence. Ignored.

There is no such thing as an 'assault rifle', no matter how many Holy Links you bring up.

Writing stories now?

Made up number. Argument from randU fallacy.

Conclusion from argument from randU fallacy. Attempted proof by randU. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

How do dead people stop guns??

Gun free zones don't work, dude. You can't take the guns away. You will get shot if you try.

Are you that stupid? The relatives and friends of those shot will stop the guns, sometime in the future. 350,000 kids have been in schools with shootings. What do you think they think about guns? That means millions of people have been personally impacted by guns and shootings. The end is coming, just not soon enough.
Gun-free zones work perfectly. No guns in an area mean no shootings. You have to think before you post. What you are saying is gun lovers break the law and bring guns into palaces where are banned.