Question for Gun-Cravens: Why Render Law-Abiding Citizens Defenseless?

[SmarterthanYou]

It doesn't matter how right you think you are about the Constitution. Because you have ZERO power. The courts and the country think you are a fucking moron. Oh, and so do I.

your opinion is worthless, given the idiocy you continually espouse here on a daily basis. As far as power...........maybe, maybe not. I have as much as any of you do, even more so on a jury.

for morons, like you, that place the courts as the final arbiter, let me just tell you that you're the epitome of dumbassery. I get it, though, since you have such low self esteem and such a lousy opinion of your own self, you need to put everyone else down to make you feel just a little bit better.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Are you that stupid? The relatives and friends of those shot will stop the guns, sometime in the future. 350,000 kids have been in schools with shootings. What do you think they think about guns? That means millions of people have been personally impacted by guns and shootings. The end is coming, just not soon enough.

so you're unfamiliar with math and the concept of superior firepower. no problem.

Gun-free zones work perfectly. No guns in an area mean no shootings. You have to think before you post. What you are saying is gun lovers break the law and bring guns into palaces where are banned.

uvalde is a gun free zone........it didn't keep guns out of it. the nashville school is a gun free zone, it didn't keep guns out of it. you should probably think before YOU post.

 

[Concart]

your opinion is worthless, given the idiocy you continually espouse here on a daily basis. As far as power...........maybe, maybe not. I have as much as any of you do, even more so on a jury.

for morons, like you, that place the courts as the final arbiter, let me just tell you that you're the epitome of dumbassery. I get it, though, since you have such low self esteem and such a lousy opinion of your own self, you need to put everyone else down to make you feel just a little bit better.

Well, except for the fact that the courts are on my side...... and the oathkeepers are on yours.

 

[Into the Night]

It doesn't matter how right you think you are about the Constitution. Because you have ZERO power. The courts and the country think you are a fucking moron. Oh, and so do I.

So you discard the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions.

You say he has zero power. He has guns, dumbass. He knows how to use them too! He's also a voter. He's also a juror (if called). He provides for himself and his family, AND provides for welfare freaks like you. He has opinions and a mind. He has the backing of his community, police, and soldiers. He backs them as well.

What have you got? Nuthin'. You are locked in paranoia and fear. You depend on those that will turn against you. You choose to remain defenseless, leaving yourself open to animals, criminals, and abusive tyrants. You are so poor at the English language you can't even define what a 'woman' is. You don't even know what gender you are. All you know is what the Democrats tell you. You are ignorant and illiterate. Your boasting makes NO difference to what you are.

I know who has power, and who doesn't!

 

[Flash]

The law-abiding citizens being preyed upon by criminals you oblivious moron.

They are not defenseless if they buy a gun or does that simple fact go over your head? It has gotten much easier in recent years.

 

[Into the Night]

Are you that stupid?

Lame. Do you really think your insults make any difference?

The relatives and friends of those shot will stop the guns, sometime in the future.

Any who try will get shot.

350,000 kids have been in schools with shootings.

Another made up number. Argument from randU fallacy.

What do you think they think about guns?

Simple.
Some are afraid of them like you are. Like you, they are hoplophobics.
Some really don't give a shit.
Some realize the reason the right of self defense is inherent, and will probably start carrying a gun.

That means millions of people have been personally impacted by guns and shootings.

More random numbers.

The end is coming, just not soon enough.

You REALLY want to start a civil war, don't you? If you're not careful, you will get what you want.

Gun-free zones work perfectly.

Is that why there are people shooting up schools?

No guns in an area mean no shootings.

Is that why there are people shooting up schools?

You have to think before you post.

You have to think before you post. Obviously you are not.

What you are saying is gun lovers break the law and bring guns into palaces where are banned.

There are no palaces.
It is unconstitutional to ban or limit guns or any other weapon.

You are locked in paradox again. You are being irrational. You are now complaining about the very thing you say doesn't exist.

 

[Into the Night]

They are not defenseless if they buy a gun or does that simple fact go over your head? It has gotten much easier in recent years.

You really should try to pay attention to the conversation before you post.

 

[IBDaMann]

. An assault rifle is a specific type of weapon. It is defined.

Nope. It is not defined in any way that distinguishes any type of semiautomatic rifle from any other type of rifle, or even from a shotgun, or a carbine. All that is ever offered is horror story ghost tale material about the evil and terrifying high-capacity monster who was bred by conservatives to kill easily with his high muzzle velocity ... which all firearms have because, you know, bullets.

. Quit lying.

You are the liar. You aren't capable of being honest. You are a shitty person who advocates for the killing of living humans who haven't committed any crime and who haven't expressed any desire to die, just for someone else's convenience. To build on that, you want to see law-abiding citizens rendered totally defenseless before violent crime, and you want our children corraled into defenselessness zones to be conveniently slaughtered by the first crazy murderer who passes by. Now you accuse me of the lying you do. We can do this all day.

 

[Concart]

Nope. It is not defined in any way that distinguishes any type of semiautomatic rifle from any other type of rifle, or even from a shotgun, or a carbine. All that is ever offered is horror story ghost tale material about the evil and terrifying high-capacity monster who was bred by conservatives to kill easily with his high muzzle velocity ... which all firearms have because, you know, bullets.


You are the liar. You aren't capable of being honest. You are a shitty person who advocates for the killing of living humans who haven't committed any crime and who haven't expressed any desire to die, just for someone else's convenience. To build on that, you want to see law-abiding citizens rendered totally defenseless before violent crime, and you want our children corraled into defenselessness zones to be conveniently slaughtered by the first crazy murderer who passes by. Now you accuse me of the lying you do. We can do this all day.

False. There was a Federal assault weapons ban. It was very specific. So are the current state bans on those weapons. So, you are wrong. Again. Just like always.

 

[Into the Night]

Well, except for the fact that the courts are on my side...... and the oathkeepers are on yours.

Courts don't have a 'side' (other than biased judges). What makes you think the Oathkeepers are on my side?? I certainly don't agree with a lot of their agenda.

 

[Into the Night]

False. There was a Federal assault weapons ban. It was very specific. So are the current state bans on those weapons. So, you are wrong. Again. Just like always.

There is no such thing as an 'assault weapon'. It is unconstitutional to ban or limit any weapon.

 

[archives]

There is no such thing as an 'assault weapon'. It is unconstitutional to ban or limit any weapon.

Wrong, and please, spare us the semantical idiocy, and wrong again, the U.S., with SCOTUS confirmation, has regulated weapons its entire history

Want to go for another one and strike out?

 

[Hawkeye10]

Projection.

You would be more convincing if you had not liked so many of my posts over the years. I will assume that I am watching a temper tantrum from you because I am so often right about how much trouble America is in because conservatives have failed, and failed all the way.

 

[Into the Night]

Wrong, and please, spare us the semantical idiocy, and wrong again, the U.S., with SCOTUS confirmation, has regulated weapons its entire history

Want to go for another one and strike out?

SCOTUS does not have authority to change the Constitution.
It is unconstitutional to ban or limit any weapon. SCOTUS has no authority to throw out the 2nd amendment or to modify it.

 

[Into the Night]

You would be more convincing if you had not liked so many of my posts over the years. I will assume that I am watching a temper tantrum from you because I am so often right about how much trouble America is in because conservatives have failed, and failed all the way.

They haven't failed.

 

[Hawkeye10]

They haven't failed.

The failure started in the 60's when universities were abandoned to the Victim Culture Cult, which became their HQ.

Now the Universities are no longer fit for purpose, they have become a force for Evil.

 

[Nordberg]

SCOTUS does not have authority to change the Constitution.
It is unconstitutional to ban or limit any weapon. SCOTUS has no authority to throw out the 2nd amendment or to modify it.

By virtue of translating the Constitution in cases that come to the court, they are simply and factually changing the Constitution.
The second requires a well-regulated militia to justify having guns. We once needed a militia to protect the new, weak free state. Once we no longer needed is a militia, the last part is meaningless and void.

 

[IBDaMann]

By virtue of translating the Constitution in cases that come to the court, they are simply and factually changing the Constitution.

Nordberg, you're being a Nordberg again. The Constitution has never been modified by the Supreme Court. The Constitution has only been changed by Congress, according to the process proscribed by the Constitution. The Supreme Court has no authority to modify the Constitution. You regurgitate the silliest things.

I bet you regret your decision to forego learning to read. It would have really helped with the Constitution.

The second requires a well-regulated militia to justify having guns.

I bet you regret your decision to forego learning to read. It would have really helped with the Constitution.

 

[domer76]

One has to wonder about the sanity of a person who claims that there was no election in 2020 and that firearms can’t be regulated.

Those are the delusional people that SHOULD be prevented from possessing guns.

 

[Nordberg]

One has to wonder about the sanity of a person who claims that there was no election in 2020 and that firearms can’t be regulated.

Those are the delusional people that SHOULD be prevented from possessing guns.

I am beginning to feel very sorry for him and all his socks. It is kind of sad and creepy.