Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

How many .22 Mags were around in the 1770s, moron? Most had nothing more than a malfunctioning musket. Certainly extemely few handguns. One shot each.

They didn’t pack like you uneducated morons think they did.

Educate yourself dumbfuck.
We're just waiting for you to educate yourself. It's going to be a long wait.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Still do? .22 Magnums, right, dumbfuck? Just like in 1780? Neither centerfire nor rimfire was even invented yet. You got one shot. :rofl2:

Try this illiterate dumbfuck. I never said the mechanics didn’t work. I said that that most weapons were so neglected that they were essentially useless.

Did the farmers pack handguns, dumbfuck? Of course not. They were expensive and inaccurate. Did people in the city pack? Of course not, you fucking idiot.

Why don’t you get a book or two and educate yourself about 18th century firearm use and the concept to “bear arms”? Until
Then, you post out of ignorance.
That's ironic, you accusing someone else of being ignorant.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Bullshit on relying for them for food. It was an agrarian society, dumfuck.

Another illiterate dumbfuck. I never said anything about antique firearms or my current knowledge of their use. I said, you illiterate fuck, people did not pack, nor had any need to at that time. They didn’t have handguns for the most part and the farmers didn’t rely on them for their subsistence.

Get a book on tape, illiterate fuck, and educate yourself about the use of weapons in the 18th century for their everyday living. In the cities. In the country.

Tell me again, cunt, about your personal experience with gun deaths.

You are unbelievably ignorant. A lot of families in those days relied on hunting, often by their children, for part of their food supply. And you did state that many of their weapons were neglected and not functional.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
But there was the rather spectacular North Hollywood shootout in 1997. Almost 2,000 rounds fired and the 2 with the machine guns were the only deaths. I guess machine guns aren't as magical as you think they are.

I Googled this shootout and watched a couple youtube videos about it which led me to this neat YouTube channel named "Donut Operator". It's a cop show but not all icy like that one that used to be on tv. The host is an ex cop.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwkm_Wcyh0pc7UUmZZfL-6w/videos#
 
Tell us what this means in Heller, dumbshit. Is it their ruling or their opinion?

Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined. Stevens, J.,filed a dissenting opinion in which Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Breyer, J.,filed a dissenting opinionin which Stevens, Souter, and Ginsburg, JJ., joined.

In Heller is the food he ate, the water he drank, the air he breaths, and a bunch of other stuff I would rather not bother to list.

Opinions are not rulings.
 
You just don’t know shit about SCOTUS cases, do you?

Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined. Stevens, J.,filed a dissenting opinion in which Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Breyer, J.,filed a dissenting opinionin which Stevens, Souter, and Ginsburg, JJ., joined.

Void argument fallacy. You wish to bring up some other case that came before the Supreme Court?

No court has the authority to change the Constitution of the United States. See Article III of the Constitution of the United States. The Supreme Court is not God. It cannot make law.
 
Nope, sure isn’t dumbfuck. There are no machine gun deaths because they are so highly regulated. That’s the point that a massively stupid fuck like you can’t grasp

WRONG. Machine guns were used in a terrorist attack in L.A. just a couple of years ago.

It is illegal to regulate machine guns.
 
Still do? .22 Magnums, right, dumbfuck? Just like in 1780? Neither centerfire nor rimfire was even invented yet. You got one shot. :rofl2:

Try this illiterate dumbfuck. I never said the mechanics didn’t work. I said that that most weapons were so neglected that they were essentially useless.

Did the farmers pack handguns, dumbfuck? Of course not. They were expensive and inaccurate. Did people in the city pack? Of course not, you fucking idiot.

Why don’t you get a book or two and educate yourself about 18th century firearm use and the concept to “bear arms”? Until
Then, you post out of ignorance.

Making shit up now? You really are getting desperate presenting an argument like this.
 
Bullshit on relying for them for food. It was an agrarian society, dumfuck.
They did carry and they still do.
Another illiterate dumbfuck. I never said anything about antique firearms or my current knowledge of their use.
Lie.
I said, you illiterate fuck, people did not pack, nor had any need to at that time.
They did. And people still pack today, including farmers and ranchers while working.
They didn’t have handguns for the most part and the farmers didn’t rely on them for their subsistence.
They did. Flintlock handguns were quite common.
Get a book on tape, illiterate fuck, and educate yourself about the use of weapons in the 18th century for their everyday living. In the cities. In the country.
Take your own advice.
Tell me again, cunt, about your personal experience with gun deaths.
Irrelevant. You are fixated on gore stories. Get help.
 
Yet they were rarely used even before they were restricted. Being restricted didn't prevent those bank robbers from using them. They're just more trouble than they're worth for a criminal endeavor. You really don't think much, do you? Does it hurt your head?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Quite true. They use too much ammo for most situations. Even the mafia considered a small .38 special pistol their favorite gun.
 
I mentioned the laws and practices of the time, dumbfuck. People living in the cities didn’t pack. They did business.

People in the country didn’t pack. They were busy farming.

Ignorant fucktard.

Some did, both in the cities and on the farm; just like they do today.
 
Actually, many farmers did and still do "pack." My uncle kept a .22 Mag. on his tractor for predators (fox, coyote,etc.) and usually had a handgun on when walking around his farm.
But you know better, right farmer dickhead?

...and that isn't an unusual practice among farmers and ranchers.
 
How many .22 Mags were around in the 1770s, moron? Most had nothing more than a malfunctioning musket. Certainly extemely few handguns. One shot each.

They didn’t pack like you uneducated morons think they did.

Educate yourself dumbfuck.

Irrelevant. Presentism fallacy.
 
Back
Top