Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

[Into the Night]

Let me tell you! You do not decide who is right or wrong based on your political view! That just demonstrates your own Inversion fallacy, false equivalence, and hypocrisy!

And, I can always ask other fourm members to not address me here in this forum! It's just a personal request dude! I didn't break any forum rules by doing so!

You can ask, for all the difference its going to make.

 

[CFM]

Let me tell you! You do not decide who is right or wrong based on your political view! That just demonstrates your own Inversion fallacy, false equivalence, and hypocrisy!

And, I can always ask other fourm members to not address me here in this forum! It's just a personal request dude! I didn't break any forum rules by doing so!

You can ask all you want. Until you're man enough to back it up, the answer is no.

 

[Adolf_Twitler]

Still locked in paradox. Which is it, dude?

Still trying to imply that my proposal of registering guns and licensing is a paradox, when I have made no contradictions, and there are clear and sound reasons for having a policy like that in place, and I have demonstrated and explained every one of them.

In fact, you are the one that seems to be locked in a paradox with your opposition and rejection of my proposal without any sound reason for your position!

Is the licensing for drivers of automobiles, and the registration of vehicles a paradoxical viewpoint? No!

Which makes you the one with the cotradictory and paradoxical viewpoint!

 

[CFM]

Still trying to imply that my proposal of registering guns and licensing is a paradox, when I have made no contradictions, and there are clear and sound reasons for having a policy like that in place, and I have demonstrated and explained every one of them.

In fact, you are the one that seems to be locked in a paradox with your opposition and rejection of my proposal without any sound reason for your position!

Is the licensing for drivers of automobiles, and the registration of vehicles a paradoxical viewpoint? No!

Which makes you the one with the cotradictory and paradoxical viewpoint!

He's not implying it, he state, accurately, that you have made contradictions.

You claiming that what you support and the reasons you give being sound is on the same level as asking a fox with feathers in his mouth if he raided the hen house then believing him when he said no.


Are cars and guns the same thing? NO! Why do you treat them as if they are.

 

[Adolf_Twitler]

You can ask all you want. Until you're man enough to back it up, the answer is no.

Back up exactly what?

And what delusional thoughts do you have, that could make you think you are a bigger man than any other male poster here in this forum? And what meaning do you expect your delusional self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion have to do with us who think and reason? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?

Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your ignorance. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly.

Thanks!

 

[CFM]

Back up exactly what?

And what delusional thoughts do you have, that could make you think you are a bigger man than any other male poster here in this forum? And what meaning do you expect your delusional self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion have to do with us who think and reason? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?

Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your ignorance. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly.

Thanks!

You claim you ask people not to respond to you. My answer is no. What the fuck are you going to do, ask again, and again, and again despite getting the same answer.

What makes you think you're more than a worthless nigger lover? The only thing you wait on is another one of their asses to kiss.

 

[Into the Night]

Still trying to imply that my proposal of registering guns and licensing is a paradox, when I have made no contradictions, and there are clear and sound reasons for having a policy like that in place, and I have demonstrated and explained every one of them.

Contexomy fallacy. You are still locked in paradox.

a) I do not want to take guns away
b) Guns should be taken away until one is licensed.

Which is it, dude?

In fact, you are the one that seems to be locked in a paradox with your opposition and rejection of my proposal without any sound reason for your position!

Lie. I have given you my reasons. Fallacy fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (argument of the stone<->paradox).

Is the licensing for drivers of automobiles, and the registration of vehicles a paradoxical viewpoint? No!

False equivalence fallacy. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Which makes you the one with the cotradictory and paradoxical viewpoint!

Inversion fallacy. Fallacy fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (false equivalance fallacy<->paradox, viewpoint<->paradox). Buzzword fallacy.

 

[Adolf_Twitler]

Since the 2nd amendment is in the Constitution, it can't be superseded. Just another Constitution hater than doesn't understand a simple concept.

You seem to not understand what Amendment/Acts to our Constitution are?

And you seem to misunderstand how Amendments and Acts by Congress supersedes the original Constitution.

Study up- and get back to us when you understand the way our government and the Constitutional process actually works- and according to our Constitution!

 

[CFM]

You seem to not understand what Amendment/Acts to our Constitution are?

And you seem to misunderstand how Amendments and Acts by Congress supersedes the original Constitution.

Study up- and get back to us when you understand the way our government and the Constitutional process actually works- and according to our Constitution!

Study up and get back when you understand that laws passed by a legislative body can't violate the Constitution.

 

[gfm7175]

Let me tell you! You do not decide who is right or wrong based on your political view!

Self defense is an inherent right. That has nothing to do with my political views. That, rather, has to do with the fact that I exist.

That just demonstrates your own Inversion fallacy, false equivalence, and hypocrisy!

Poppycock.

And, I can always ask other fourm members to not address me here in this forum! It's just a personal request dude!

You are in a public forum, making posts to the public. The public is going to respond to your posts if they feel compelled to do so. RB 60 is part of that "public". You can ask him to not address you all you want, but ultimately, so long as you keep making posts in this forum, he has the ability to address them, and there's nothing you can do about that.

I didn't break any forum rules by doing so!

Correct, you didn't. I never said that you did.

 

[Adolf_Twitler]

Study up and get back when you understand that laws passed by a legislative body can't violate the Constitution.

Thanks for stating the obvious- as I fully well understand that!

And nothing I have said here today contradicts that!

Thanks Captain Obvious for sharing something we all know!

My question to you is, Congress just recently banned Bump-Stocks................

Pop quiz for you- DID THAT VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION?

 

[Into the Night]

Back up exactly what?

Don't play dumb. Your own argument of course. Do you wish to now deny you ever made it?

And what delusional thoughts do you have, that could make you think you are a bigger man than any other male poster here in this forum?

Non-sequitur fallacy.

And what meaning do you expect your delusional self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion have to do with us who think and reason?

Inversion fallacy. This is YOUR problem.

What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?

Inversion fallacy. Again, YOUR problem. You seem to like to project your own problems on others.

Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your ignorance.

Again, inversion fallacy.

The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly.

Insult fallacy.

 

[CFM]

Thanks for stating the obvious- as I fully well understand that!

And nothing I have said here today contradicts that!

Thanks Captain Obvious for sharing something we all know!

My question to you is, Congress just recently banned Bump-Stocks................

Pop quiz for you- DID THAT VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION?

Everything you've said does. That you refuse to acknowledge it doesn't change it.

Pop quiz for you - Are bump stocks guns/arms?

 

[Into the Night]

You seem to not understand what Amendment/Acts to our Constitution are?

What amendment are you referring to?

And you seem to misunderstand how Amendments and Acts by Congress supersedes the original Constitution.

WRONG. No act of Congress supersedes the Constitution!

Study up- and get back to us when you understand the way our government and the Constitutional process actually works- and according to our Constitution!

Take your own advice, dude.

 

[Adolf_Twitler]

Contexomy fallacy. You are still locked in paradox.

a) I do not want to take guns away
b) Guns should be taken away until one is licensed.

Which is it, dude?

Lie. I have given you my reasons. Fallacy fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (argument of the stone<->paradox).

False equivalence fallacy. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Inversion fallacy. Fallacy fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (false equivalance fallacy<->paradox, viewpoint<->paradox). Buzzword fallacy.

Hey stupid liar- I never said guns should be taken away until one is licensed- THAT'S YOU RUNNING YOUR MOUTH MAKING CRAZY ALLEGATIONS!

Dude! Take a couple of seconds, and tell us everything you know about fallacy..... go ahead and take 10 seconds if you need to! LOL!

 

[Into the Night]

Thanks for stating the obvious- as I fully well understand that!
And nothing I have said here today contradicts that!
Thanks Captain Obvious for sharing something we all know!

Paradox. Which is it, dude?

My question to you is, Congress just recently banned Bump-Stocks................

Pop quiz for you- DID THAT VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION?

Yes.

 

[Into the Night]

Hey stupid liar

Inversion fallacy. A paradox is lying with yourself. You are denying your own arguments.

- I never said guns should be taken away until one is licensed-

Lie.

THAT'S YOU RUNNING YOUR MOUTH MAKING CRAZY ALLEGATIONS!

Lie.

Dude! Take a couple of seconds, and tell us everything you know about fallacy..... go ahead and take 10 seconds if you need to! LOL!

Okay. A fallacy is an error in logic, a closed functional system. It is similar to a math error in mathematics, another closed functional system.

 

[Adolf_Twitler]

Paradox. Which is it, dude?

Yes.

See there? How ignorant you are!

At least you admit it!

Go learn the Constitutional process and get back to us OK?

 

[Adolf_Twitler]

Amendments to the Constitution and Acts that become law- are the Constitution idiot!

Go learn the Constitutional process and get back to us OK?

 

[CFM]

Amendments to the Constitution and Acts that become law- are the Constitution idiot!

Go learn the Constitutional process and get back to us OK?

Amendments are the Constitution, acts passed by legislative bodies have to be in compliance with the Constitution.

See, you learned something and that's saying a lot for a stupid nigger like you.