Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

[USFREEDOM911]

I'd be ok with waiting until it's on the way to being a problem. However, right now, there are more than enough humans reproducing.

So you'll wait, as long as it doesn't affect you; so how does abortion affect you?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

No, because I think laws actually do work against guns and abortions. I'm consistent.

Are you?

Then give one law that worked.

 

[Into the Night]

It's beginning to look like Stone and some other JPP liberals FEEL that they wouldn't be able to control their violent urges, if they had access to a gun, and therefore want to project their lack of control onto others.

An interesting line of thought. Could it be that this is the real motivation that many liberals have for wanting to ban guns?

...or are they just chanting what they hear from the Church of Karl Marx?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

But Incels are so ewww.

So you feel badly about your proclivities.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Not the question. The question is, if laws against gun ownership are pointless due to the black market, are laws against abortion also pointless?

What "law" do you think has made a difference with anything??

 

[USFREEDOM911]

So does that mean you do think gun control works?

You keep dancing around the matter and you have yet to explain what and how a law has worked.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Yes, and it is. Doctors generally consider a person to be dead when the brain stops functioning. Why not be consistent? Life begins and ends with brain activity.

And now you'll have to admit that without a brain,. there is no heart pumping.

Ergo: life begins younger then you want it to.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

You obviously don't since you don't know when life begins.

and yet, I know even a zygote is alive.......why do you hate science....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Those jokes kinda backfire when Conservatives actually do have lower IQ rates on average.

/shrugs......the posters here prove you wrong every day......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Then give one law that worked.

Chicago banned guns and saved lives......

 

[Part Multi 313]

Define 'assault rifle'. What in the Constitution of the United States gives them the authority to ban any type of gun depending type of action it has, what the gun looks like, what it's made of, or depending on what brand it might be? I see no such phrasing in the 2nd amendment anywhere.

I wasn't stating that the Constitution allowed or disallowed anything. To my knowledge, the U.S. government banned bumpstocks but haven't yet banned assault rifles. From a moral standpoint assault rifles don't have a useful niche in civilian life and many mass shooters use assault rifles that were obtained legally and were only used because they were handy. (in an uncles cabinet or such)

I would personally define an assault rifle as any automatic rifle that is magazine ready or can be fed a continuous supply of munitions so that the operator can fire dozens of rounds in seconds. You can sort out the measurements yourselves.

 

[Part Multi 313]

So would banning guns also greatly reduce the number of people with guns?

Yes. Just like during prohibition. Drinking was greatly reduced as a whole although a small percentage of people went to secret speakeasies and made their own alcohol. I imagine the same would happen with rifles. Most everyone would go without and only a select few would get rifles some other way and hide them.

 

[/MSG/]

I wasn't stating that the Constitution allowed or disallowed anything. To my knowledge, the U.S. government banned bumpstocks but haven't yet banned assault rifles. From a moral standpoint assault rifles don't have a useful niche in civilian life and many mass shooters use assault rifles that were obtained legally and were only used because they were handy. (in an uncles cabinet or such)

I would personally define an assault rifle as any automatic rifle that is magazine ready or can be fed a continuous supply of munitions so that the operator can fire dozens of rounds in seconds. You can sort out the measurements yourselves.

That's literally every rifle since 1886.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

So...are you going to murder him?

Him who? Toxic TOP? That's allegedly a female, if that's who you're talking about. There is no point in murdering the already-brain dead.

 

[Sirthinksalot]

If banning guns is pointless because people can just get guns on the black market, is banning abortion also pointless?

If you're against guns, don't own them. If you're against abortion, don't have one.

 

[Sirthinksalot]

I wasn't stating that the Constitution allowed or disallowed anything. To my knowledge, the U.S. government banned bumpstocks but haven't yet banned assault rifles. From a moral standpoint assault rifles don't have a useful niche in civilian life and many mass shooters use assault rifles that were obtained legally and were only used because they were handy. (in an uncles cabinet or such)

I would personally define an assault rifle as any automatic rifle that is magazine ready or can be fed a continuous supply of munitions so that the operator can fire dozens of rounds in seconds. You can sort out the measurements yourselves.

Go ahead and ban automatic rifles. Leave the semi automatic ones alone and we can agree.

 

[Granule]

If banning guns is pointless because people can just get guns on the black market, is banning abortion also pointless?

Nope, because banning guns deprives lawful citizens of their right to self defense, but banning abortions is always good because we're saying no to murder and we're not making it easier for the selfish degenerates to abort their unborn.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I wasn't stating that the Constitution allowed or disallowed anything. To my knowledge, the U.S. government banned bumpstocks but haven't yet banned assault rifles. From a moral standpoint assault rifles don't have a useful niche in civilian life and many mass shooters use assault rifles that were obtained legally and were only used because they were handy. (in an uncles cabinet or such)

I would personally define an assault rifle as any automatic rifle that is magazine ready or can be fed a continuous supply of munitions so that the operator can fire dozens of rounds in seconds. You can sort out the measurements yourselves.

Well, that settles your concerns; because "automatic rifles" are already regulated and not readily available to the public.

 

[rjhenn]

Better look up Heller, dumbfuck.

Heller was a step back in the right direction, but only a step. You seem bent on demonstrating that you are the dumbfuck.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

you would think there would be less a desire for guns after they invented viagra.

The usual mindless control freak babble


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk