DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Libby, shut the fuck up. No one cares what you think.
Libby, shut the fuck up. No one cares what you think.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Once again, our Super "dumb" freak demonstrates his inability to comprehend what he reads.
I didn't allude to "no" violent crime.....I merely point out that Pima has the system that gunners swore would stop/prevent/lower such crimes as what happened to Gifford and the other victims.
Well, reality check.....IT DIDN'T. What it did result in was a nut job rejected by the Army who easily purchased a weapon with an extended magazine, who killed 9 people and was taken down BY UNARMED CIVILIANS.
But hey, maybe next time it'll happen just like you gunners keep saying it will.
LMAO... yeah, you did allude to "no" violent crime.
Obviously, you can't comprehend what you read, you Super dumb freak. Your fantasy just doesn't cut it when faced with the actual words in the post. But please, do explain to everyone how my EXACT words "alluded" to what you assert. If you can't, then you're just another chuckling gunner clown.
You stated that this incident is proof the gun policies in AZ don't work to stop/prevent/lower such crimes.
Facts are facts, chuckles. Don't come bitching to me because you don't like them.
ONE incident is not evidence that the laws don't work. If you cited statistics showing the crime rates had increased over time despite the laws... THAT would validate your point.
Not so fast, chuckles....I gave ONE category trumpeted by you gunners, of which fits the Loughner/Gifford situation. Gunners were constantly stating that incidences like the forementioned COULD BE PREVENTED had the citizenry had easy access to weapons and allowed to carry them....and they would tout the OCCASIONAL report from some town in some state where Joe Citizen foiled an assualt/robbery because he/she was strapped. Well chuckles, on THIS occasion it didn't exactly turn out like you wished, did it?
But your ignorance compels you to continue to spout the same ignorance yet again.
Yes, Hitler and Marx are opposed, the point is that he read both, told his friend he was fond of Marx. He was more an anarchist than anything if you really want to label him.
As with all the other diehard neocons, you IGNORE information that doesn't fit your mantras. Loughner's wasn't just a professed fan of Marx, he was a fan of Mein Kampf....diametrically opposed beliefs, don't cha know. And as the neocon punditry all line their talking points and harp on the statements of former acquaintances several years removed, they ignore what the man wrote on his websites. Fortunately, others didn't:
Loughner's ramblings appear rooted in far rightExperts say the suspect in the Arizona shooting rampage is fixated on issues cited by other extremists. But he also appears to have been influenced by the far left.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...a-shooting-extremism-20110112,0,7697607.story
Your obsessive need to blame Palin is pathetic. If you actually pay attention to the facts that have been released, it is now known that he has been obsessed with Giffords since 2007. Long before Palin and the tea party.
"obsessive"? Sorry toodles, but if you follow the chronology of the Posts, it was your imbecilic compadres that introduced Madame Palin to the frey. I merely pointed out that her rhetoric and off hand condoning of the rabid teabagger rhetoric at her paid rallies are frightenling similar to the stuff Loughner was spewing....and she did "target" Loughner at one point. What started in 2007 was given an encouraging atmosphere in 2008, 2009, 2010, with Palin as a celebrated cheerleader.
These were the actions of a lunatic. Period.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Ahhh, but the FACTS are that he did obtain his weapon legally...DESPITE being officially rejected by the Army due to mental instability.
A better background check system coupled with a 7 day waiting period would have prevented Loughner from getting his weapon so easily. But now we'll never know.
LMAO.... do link us up to where you found out the Army rejected him due to mental instability.
What I heard reported was that they rejected him because he failed a drug test.
True enough chuckles, as they're initially conflicting reports. The "mental" story was derived from the fact that the idiot PASSED the drug test, but answers a questions about drugs that he's was an avid pothead. Here's the true skinny on the matter that corrects both of us:
How Marijuana Use Aborted Jared Loughner's Military Career
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2041634,00.html#ixzz1AmxJAxDq
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2041634,00.html
/Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Out of context quotes - 3 - as opposed to the 4 years of threatening rhetoric from teabagger rallies, and anti-obama campaign rhetoric that is STILL being used. You really have the balls to do a point for point comparison, bunky? Here's a starter:
http://www.politicalarticles.net/blo...entertainment
So now the tea party has been around for 4 years?
Do provide us with examples of the 'threatening rhetoric'
You mean you don't care was he thinks. Most of the rest of the world doesn't share your opinions.
Libby, shut the fuck up. No one cares what you think.
I love it when willfully ignorant/misinformed blowhards like yourself start calling names when YOU JUST DON'T KNOW WTF IS GOING ON......TCL Clarabell
========================================================
What a post....too funny......Clarabell must have been born with shit4brains.
as he calls someone a blowhard. ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha fousted by your own petard!
just for clarification, and to put it on the record, are you saying you agree with what Touchie thinks?.....
as he calls someone a blowhard. ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha fousted by your own petard!
I didn't read your posts. Stop lying.And yet here YOU are, again! Are you such a damned stupid Damned Yankee that you don't see the idiocy of reading and commenting on posts by someone you claim not to care about?
If you can't debate the issue and/or defend your Damned Yankee position regarding the subject, then don't post. Save you time and effort and frustration, and spares the rest of us your silliness.
That's "hoist" with ones own petard. WTF is "fousted"?
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
And yet here YOU are, again! Are you such a damned stupid Damned Yankee that you don't see the idiocy of reading and commenting on posts by someone you claim not to care about?
If you can't debate the issue and/or defend your Damned Yankee position regarding the subject, then don't post. Save you time and effort and frustration, and spares the rest of us your silliness.
I didn't read your posts. Stop lying.
If you'd prefer a different clown name, just tell me....either way, you're still a dimwitted clown.....For those of you who are NOT of the WW2 generation...."Clarabell" was a clown sidekick for Buffalo Bob and his puppet "Howdy Doody"...a kid show on TV before they had color.
This is obviously a BIG insult for the old duffers of Bravo's ilk....so much more to pity Bravo, who can't debate the issue worth a damn, but is so pissed at me humiliating him repeatedly that he just shows up to spit venom.
Bravo just doesn't know WTF is going on!