Fauci flip-flops more than a flounder on dry land.
Rand Paul KO’s Fauci in the first round
- Thread starter Darth Omar
- Start date
Fauci flip-flops more than a flounder on dry land.
Actually he said masks were not necessary. He only later said masks were needed. Fauci also said Americans didn't have to worry about COVID. Also the holes in cloth masks are about 5 times larger than COVID virus. Its like expecting a chain link fence to stop a mosquito.
he said, masks were not needed, then admitted he lied. Then they said cloth masks work even though peer reviewed studies say otherwise. Then of course now we are now told to wear two masks. (indicating he lied again that cloth masks work) .
He attacked Fauci by saying he could not get the virus after being vaccinated. Surely Rand knows the masks are not to keep from getting the virus but to keep from spreading it to others. We don't know if those who have been vaccinated can still spread it to others.
Actually he said masks were not necessary. He only later said masks were needed. Fauci also said Americans didn't have to worry about COVID. Also the holes in cloth masks are about 5 times larger than COVID virus. Its like expecting a chain link fence to stop a mosquito.
Untrue.
"there’s no reason to be walking around with a mask.” -St Fauci
here he is saying cloth masks work:
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=965812513924726
yet:
here they clearly dont work well
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27531371/
So now we are told we have to wear two masks.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/25/dr-...-covid-makes-common-sense-more-effective.html
so he went from no mask to cloth masks to double masks. At some point you have to start wondering if he's the best person to listen to.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
It may be too early for all the facts and evidense to come in. You can't spike the football on the 10 yard line.
It still does not mean that the public can trust who has been vaccinated and who hasn't- just by who is wearing or donning the masks!
BECAUSE, EVEN THOUGH OUR RECKLESS GOVERNOR HERE IN THIS SUCK UP TO TRUMP RED STATE HAS OPENED UP THIS STATE- BUSINESSES ARE STILL ASKING US TO WEAR OUR MASKS , TO BE ALLOWED THROUGH THE DOORS OF THEIR BUSINESSES, UNTIL THEY HAVE FURTHER PROOF THAT WE ARE READY TO GO MASKLESS IN PUBLIC.
SO IT DON'T MATTER WHAT THE CARELESS IDIOT RAND PAUL HAS TO SAY ABOUT MASKS- IT IS NOT UP TO HIM.
WE ALREADY KNOW HOW SUCH A CARELESS FOOL HE WAS IN KNOWING FULLY WELL HE HAD THE VIRUS, AND THEN WENT AND JUMPED IN THE POOL AT HIS WORKOUT CENTER TO SPREAD THE VIRUS TO MANY OTHERS.
IF THAT IDIOT HAD OF LISTENED TO THE CDC AND COMPLIED TO THE MASK ORDER- HE WOULD HAVE NEVER CONTACTED THE VIRUS IN THE FIRST PLACE- SO WE ALREADY KNOW HE IS AN IDIOT!
WHEN YOU CAN'T EVEN LOOK OUT FOR YOURSELF- YOU SHOULD NEVER BE TELLING OTHERS WHAT TO DO!
NEXT!
Last edited:
evince
Truthmatters
evince
Truthmatters
Eat shit and don’t die Russo bot hole
Why do you even post on message boards? all you have is a nasyt mouth and the dog in your picture is better looking and much smarter than you.
evince
Truthmatters
From your article: "The COVID-19 vaccine trials did not directly evaluate the possibility of spread after vaccination. That is difficult to do"
Who needs me scared?
I have had both of my vaccine shots but I still wear a mask because I care about others. And, I am not paranoid.
evince
Truthmatters
In the last pandemic there were fucking idiots who tried to lie the disease away too
Guess how history remembers those brain voids?
Just the way your fucking idiots will be remembered
But you are paranoid. "that is difficult to do" why, cause its not likely. There has not been a single case of a vaccinated person infecting anyone. wearing a mask after vaccination is submission, not science.
I mean really? what do you get out of this besides looking like an unhinged piece of trash?
I feel sorry for the dog. In fact, put the dog on, I want to talk to someone rational.
evince
Truthmatters
You just can’t understand science
You just repeated the stupid take Randy Paul kept mistaking for a debate point
Where in that statement does it take all the new variants into consideration
But gebus are you people fucking stupid
So you say. Is it your alleged concern for others that motivates you to hide your face?
Because SCIENCE™ says masks don't work.
1. Studies on the effectiveness of face masks
So far, most studies found little to no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks in the general population, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.
- A May 2020 meta-study on pandemic influenza published by the US CDC found that face masks had no effect, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.
- A July 2020 review by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth masks against virus infection or transmission.
- A Covid-19 cross-country study by the University of East Anglia came to the conclusion that a mask requirement was of no benefit and could even increase the risk of infection.
- An April 2020 review by two US professors in respiratory and infectious disease from the University of Illinois concluded that face masks have no effect in everyday life, neither as self-protection nor to protect third parties (so-called source control).
- An article in the New England Journal of Medicine from May 2020 came to the conclusion that cloth face masks offer little to no protection in everyday life.
- A July 2020 study by Japanese researchers found that cloth masks “offer zero protection against coronavirus” due to their large pore size and generally poor fit.
- A 2015 study in the British Medical Journal BMJ Open found that cloth masks were penetrated by 97% of particles and may increase infection risk by retaining moisture or repeated use.
Additional aspects:
Japan, despite its widespread use of face masks, experienced its most recent influenza epidemic with more than 5 million people falling ill just one year ago, in January and February 2019. However, unlike SARS-2, the influenza virus is transmitted by children, too.
Several countries and states that introduced mandatory face masks on public transport and in shops in early summer, such as California and Argentina, nevertheless saw a strong increase in infections from July onwards, indicating a low effectiveness of mask policies.
There is increasing evidence that SARS-2 is transmitted, at least indoors, not only by droplets but also by smaller aerosols. However, due to their large pore size, cloth masks cannot filter out aerosols.
The WHO admitted to the BBC that its June 2020 mask policy update was due not to new evidence but “political lobbying”:
“We had been told by various sources WHO committee reviewing the evidence had not backed masks but they recommended them due to political lobbying. This point was put to WHO, who did not deny.” (Deborah Cohen, BBC Medical Correspondent).
2. Studies claiming face masks are effective
Some recent studies argued that cloth face masks are indeed effective against the new coronavirus and could at least prevent the infection of other people. However, most of these studies suffer from poor methodology and sometimes show the opposite of what they claim.
Typically, these studies ignore the effect of other measures, the natural development of infection numbers, changes in test activity, or they compare countries with very different conditions.
An overview:
A German study claimed that the introduction of compulsory masks in German cities had led to a decrease in infections. But the data does not support this: in some cities there was no change, in others a decrease, in others an increase in infections. The city of Jena was an ‘exception’ only because it simultaneously introduced the strictest quarantine rules in Germany, but the study did not mention this.
Mandatory masks in German cities: no relevant impact.
A study in the journal PNAS claimed that masks had led to a decrease in infections in three hotspots (including New York City). This did not take into account the natural decrease in infections and other measures. The study was so flawed that over 40 scientists recommended that the study be withdrawn.
A US study claimed that mandatory masks had led to a decrease in infections in 15 states. The study did not take into account that the incidence of infection was already declining in most states at that time. A comparison with other states was not made.
A Canadian study claimed that countries with mandatory masks had fewer deaths than countries without mandatory masks. But the study compared African, Latin American, Asian and Eastern European countries with very different infection rates and population structures.
A much-cited meta-study in the journal The Lancet claimed that masks “could” lead to a reduction in the risk of infection, but the studies considered mainly hospitals (Sars-1), medical (not cloth) masks, and the strength of the evidence was reported as “low”.
3. Risks associated with face masks
Wearing masks for a prolonged period of time is not harmless, as the following evidence shows:
- The WHO warns of various “side effects” such as difficulty breathing and skin rashes.
- Tests conducted by the University Hospital of Leipzig in Germany have shown that face masks significantly reduce the resilience and performance of healthy persons.
- A German psychological study with about 1000 participants found “severe psychosocial consequences” due to the introduction of mandatory face masks in Germany.
- The Hamburg Environmental Institute warned against the inhalation of chlorine compounds in polyester masks as well as problems in connection with disposal.
- The European rapid alert system has already recalled 70 mask models because they did not meet EU quality standards and could lead to “serious risks”.
Conclusion: Face masks in the general population might be effective, at least in some circumstances, but there is currently little to no evidence supporting this proposition. If the SARS-2 virus is indeed transmitted via aerosols, at least indoors, masks are unlikely to be protective.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/are-face-masks-effective-evidence/5720209
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Actually he said masks were not necessary. He only later said masks were needed. Fauci also said Americans didn't have to worry about COVID. Also the holes in cloth masks are about 5 times larger than COVID virus. Its like expecting a chain link fence to stop a mosquito.
Kinda' like a fart through a screen door huh?
You people can eat the peanuts and corn out of DODO-nald Trump's shit- all you want- BUT STOP ENDANGERING THE LIVES OF OTHERS OK?
