Religions are mostly wrong

I understand you are scared you might be talking to a trans person. I understand you are equally scared I might be gay. Not sure why that scares you. It's funny to keep you guessing. You are so obsessed. Either my degree or the status of my genetalia you have your hands full with your obsessions.

Like I said talk to a psychologist (not yourself) and get some help. There's effective CBT out there for this kind of thing if you just can't let go of thoughts about my cock and/or pussy. I know it upsets you if you can't find out.

But I find your obsession so funny now I'm just going to egg you on. I find needling rancid homophobes and transphobes like you to be funny.
See, Perry? Your fears seem to be sexually based. You have nothing to fear from me. You're free to tell everyone your preferred pronoun or keep it a secret. It's a free country. God bless America!
 
Finland is in Europe, and you were chastising posters for not knowing who Tom of Finland is.

I never said he was that famous. You inferred that. I find it strange that someone like yourself who thinks themselves so smart DIDN'T know about Tom of Finland, but I understand you are limited in your knowledge.

Since his Village People-caricature cartoons are not discussed in Art History classes,

You confuse art history classes you have taken with art history classes in general. You are so limited. But, again, it's like the whole Nicene Creed thing and the whole freezing point depression thing. You don't know what you don't know and you think it is not worth knowing. But it is. It shows how YOU are a poseur.

he is obviously not considered important or particularly good, so there's no reason anyone here should have heard of him

LOL. Just because you are a moron does not make being a moron a "virtue".


I accept your confession that you lied about being awarded a PhD.

As you wish. You'd be wrong, but I'm not as obsessed with my degree as you and Cock Dutch are. You know I only mentioned it once in passing. You have now mentioned it hundreds of times. WHo is obsessed?

Why would you lie about having a PhD to random strangers on the internet? What's the benefit?

I didn't lie but I dont' really care either way. I know more about chemistry than you by a long shot and I've proven it time and again. It doesn't matter that I do or don't have this degree.

YOU were the one who wanted to sound all smart about water no existing below 0degC as a liquid. That shows how little you know. But you were to stupid and too dishonest to even own that mistake.

You are as bad a liar as anyone on here. You google like mad and then scream at people you think googled stuff. You are really a piece of shit.
 
See, Perry? Your fears seem to be sexually based. You have nothing to fear from me. You're free to tell everyone your preferred pronoun or keep it a secret. It's a free country. God bless America!

Need I remind you that YOU were the one who brought up my gender over and over and over again.
 
Last edited:
Since you lied about having a geochem PhD, the question is what else have you lied about?

How do you benefit from telling blatant lies to strangers on the internet? What's the motivation?

I love how you confuse someone's degree with their knowledge. Do you think I lied to you about freezing point depression of salt? Do you think I lied to you about Si chemistry? You can always check it out (given that you wanted to talk about things you don't understand).

But the important bit is the science and religion I spoke to you about is something that can be verified and checked. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF I HAVE THE DEGREE OR NOT.. Like I said, I only ever mentioned my doctorate in passing ONCE. Cock Douche and you jumped on it so you could make hay. YOU are the ones who have talked about it infinitely more than I ever did. I honestly don't even fucking CARE that I could get a PhD. I'm impressed that you are so threatened by the ability but I assume that's because you weren't capable.

But when you guys started blathering on and on and on about my degree and you couldn't actually talk about the technical topics I worked to drop the degree from the conversation. YOU STILL COULDN'T TALK SCIENCE.

You are too stupid to understand what I'm talking about here. But it shows you are the poseur you actually are. You want everyone to think you are so fucking smart just because you can afford to buy some books to put on your bookshelf. You don't seem to actually understand much. And when you are put in a corner you are just as dishonest as you claim others are. You lied about knowing about freezing point depression and you GOOGLED the answer. You are no better than those you accuse.

Every accusation is a confession with simps like you.
 
Need I remind you that YOU were the one who brought up my gender over and over and over again.
You’re the one who said you weren’t a man, Perry. You’re free to keep your gender and preferred pronouns a secret, dumbass.
 
IT DOESN'T MATTER IF I HAVE THE DEGREE OR NOT.
Thanks for the tacit confession you lied your ass off about being awarded a glorious geochem PhD.

It does matter. Lying is wrong whether you are moving your lips or typing on a keyboard.

The armchair psychologist in me is curious why you would lie about having a PhD to complete strangers on the internet, people you don't know and will never meet.

What's the motivation?
 
Thanks for the tacit confession you lied your ass off about being awarded a glorious geochem PhD.

It does matter. Lying is wrong whether you are moving your lips or typing on a keyboard.

The armchair psychologist in me is curious why you would lie about having a PhD to complete strangers on the internet, people you don't know and will never meet.

What's the motivation?

I have the degree. I explained it to you. You are now being dishonest. That makes you a hypocrite.

:)
 
When you were posting as Jank you wrote you didn't have a science degree, just a layperson's interest in science.

I already explained this to you. I thought you were smart enough to understand. I dropped the degree so you would be able to talk science without making it about me. But you couldn't. You are uneducated in chemistry and geochemistry.

Right now YOU AND DOC CUCK ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE TO BELABOR MY DEGREES TO ANY EXTENT. I only ever mentioned it once in passing as support for a point I made. Cock Dutch picked up on it and since, like you, he has a chip on his shoulder from being an academic failure so he had to start mocking the degree. Then it became the ONLY think you guys talk about.

You have had REPEATED opportunities to talk science but it ALWAYS devolves down to you making it about me.

Classic argumentum ad hominem. A sure sign of your intellectual inferiority complex.
 
Humans are animals. Religions are made up by humans to attempt to answer the unknown. It is absurd for humans to believe without proof that humans alone have souls, but none of the other animals do. What. Just because we have become advanced? We didn't start out this way. We were hunter/gatherers. Humans existed a long time just fine without any religions. It is the height of absurdity that once we become more advanced that we suddenly start believing all this human-contrived nonsense about a creator being and an afterlife.

People just need to step way back and look at the overall picture.

Not all world religions have a creator deity or envision an eternal afterlife.

The evidence for the earliest Homo sapiens suggest they engaged in ritualized burials and some of the Paleolithic art seems to have spiritual significance. It seems to be hardwired into us.

I agree that a person can function perfectly well without practicing a religion.
 
Hello BartenderElite,



Religions do not agree. It would be difficult, from a logical perspective, to select the one religion that is correct and decide the others are incorrect. Therefore, the most logical conclusion is that none of them are correct.

The most logical would be to acknowledge that we do not know if any of them are correct.

And just leave it at that...unless of course, one wants to make a blind guess that one position is correct and the others incorrect.

The position "none of them are correct" has the same faults as choosing any one of them to be correct.
 
The most logical would be to acknowledge that we do not know if any of them are correct.

And just leave it at that...unless of course, one wants to make a blind guess that one position is correct and the others incorrect.

The position "none of them are correct" has the same faults as choosing any one of them to be correct.

Agreed on the logical position. Any other position is a matter of faith; belief without evidence.
 
The most logical would be to acknowledge that we do not know if any of them are correct.

And just leave it at that...unless of course, one wants to make a blind guess that one position is correct and the others incorrect.

The position "none of them are correct" has the same faults as choosing any one of them to be correct.

Did you flunk out of high school?
 
Back
Top