Religions are mostly wrong

Her enraged obsession over the finer points of the thermodynamic properties of liquid water versus aqueous saline solutions is about a month old now.

Finer points? So when you say a howler like:

Liquid water can't exist in that phase below 0 C, so it can't be that cold.

It's to be overlooked and ignored?

ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU GOOGLED THE ANSWER BECAUSE YOU GOT CAUGHT WITH YOUR PANTS DOWN. LOL. That's the part I love the most. And since when is freezing point depression a "finer point"???

When one starts typing responses in all caps, huge font, red type its seems like they are nanoseconds away from having a stroke.

Your buddy Doc does it all the time. He OFTEN writes in HUGE letters when he makes up posts and attributes them to other people. Watch some time.

But you hypocrites don't quite get that far.
 
Dutch and Cypress need to get a room.

The irony is they appear to both be quite homophobic. I made a subtle joke leveraging Tom of Finland the other day and both of them picked up on it and obsessed over whether I was gay or not because I knew more art than they did. It was bizarre! I never expected them to be homophobes...but I guess you don't have to scratch 'em much to see what they REALLY are.
 
Explained to you already TWICE. God, if you can't even understand simple posts on a forum how do you expect people to think you understand all the books you claim you read?????

I said that so you would NOT make it about me all the time. But you couldn't discuss science for shit. Now we're back to talking about my degree. My degree DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER except to you. I only mentioned it in PASSING. YOU obsess on it. I assume that's because you were too stupid to get a degree in anything. Maybe they offer degrees for just buying all the textbooks and putting them on your bookshelf.

It's extremely dishonest and deceptive of you to post under sock puppet accounts, give different biographical stories, and blame other people for supposedly being your sock puppets

Lying is wrong, whether your lips are moving or hands are typing.
 
Finer points? So when you say a howler like:



It's to be overlooked and ignored?

ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU GOOGLED THE ANSWER BECAUSE YOU GOT CAUGHT WITH YOUR PANTS DOWN. LOL. That's the part I love the most. And since when is freezing point depression a "finer point"???



Your buddy Doc does it all the time. He OFTEN writes in HUGE letters when he makes up posts and attributes them to other people. Watch some time.

But you hypocrites don't quite get that far.

The claims of a hater are not proof.

I have been registered here since 2006, and have never been caught plagiarizing or copying google sources without attribution.


On the flip side, I gave you a link showing that you had obviously stolen syntax from a Wikipedia chemistry entry without attribution, and passed it off on your own.
 
Her enraged obsession over the finer points of the thermodynamic properties of liquid water versus aqueous saline solutions is about a month old now.

When one starts typing responses in all caps, huge font, red type its seems like they are nanoseconds away from having a stroke.
A person who keeps repeating a pattern such as continuously repeating the same handful or less of points of view indicates low intelligence or mental illness. On JPP, it's often both. After all, what 30something is regularly spending time on JPP on a weekend nights? My observations over the past 37 years being online eliminate a lot of people; mainly in the socially active categories.

This is one reason why I started a thread on personality testing. Like any Internet poll, since it's on a volunteer basis, only certain personalities will reply creating a possible bias.

There's another, IMO more important, major reason; consider that T.A.Gardner, Macawber* and I are all "Architects" yet observe the difference in our politics. That indicates there's more to people as individual minds than a single test can fully indicate.

That said, as the results posted here prove, even though we are all the same "personality", we remain individuals with those same identified traits. It's the psychological version of identifying the various skills and positions of an opposing sports team.


*now banned...under that username, IP or VPN. LOL
 
It's extremely dishonest and deceptive of you to post under sock puppet accounts, give different biographical stories, and blame other people for supposedly being your sock puppets

Lying is wrong, whether your lips are moving or hands are typing.

You could take your own words of advice as well, Mr. Entropy. LOL.

You are stinging right now because your fragile ego cannot handle that others might think less of you because you made a simple mistake. That mistake isn't what I mock. What I mock is an intellectual poseur like you who can scream about OTHERS' dishonesty while giving themself a pass for their dishonesty. The reason I mock you is you are a hypocrite. A hypocrite and poseur. You buy books like it's going to make you the intellect you imagine you are. But all you do is pass your eyes over the text and put them on a shelf and point to them saying "See! I am SMART!"

It's also why you LABORIOUSLY tell EVERYONE all the time how much you've read of The Bhagavad Gita, and The Dao De Ching and this and that. And even then you can't handle it when you are corrected by anyone. No one can be as smart as the mighty Cypress. Why you've been registered here since 2006! What a great towering intellect.
 
The claims of a hater are not proof.

But the evidence I posted was. :). Just because you think you can get away with something doesn't mean you are successful.

I have been registered here since 2006

Oh god...who the fuck cares? You've been an internet intellectual poseur for 17 years now! WOo hoo!

, and have never been caught plagiarizing or copying google sources without attribution.

Until I caught you. Good for me!
 
Dutch and Cypress need to get a room.
Like you and TOP? Let's be honest, COgoat, would you do her if you could? A public answer is frought with problems regardless how you answer.

You, being a bit "off the beaten path", will not reply honestly because, IMO, you can't. That's not a "man challenge" like one of your KKK fellows uses, it's an observation. You follow a pattern to feed your needs.

Psychologically, that's normal. It's what "needs" you have that differentiates people and starts to draw lines of social behavior. Consider the personalities in the KKK vs. "The Nice Thread". Sum them up and consider the overall picture if you boiled it down to a "norm".

Where do you think the KKK would rate compared to TNT? On what scale?
If you don't understand the questions, that's okay. I'm just trying to measure where you are educationally and mentally. :)
 
A person who keeps repeating a pattern such as continuously repeating the same handful or less of points of view indicates low intelligence or mental illness. On JPP, it's often both. After all, what 30something is regularly spending time on JPP on a weekend nights? My observations over the past 37 years being online eliminate a lot of people; mainly in the socially active categories.

This is one reason why I started a thread on personality testing. Like any Internet poll, since it's on a volunteer basis, only certain personalities will reply creating a possible bias.

There's another, IMO more important, major reason; consider that T.A.Gardner, Macawber* and I are all "Architects" yet observe the difference in our politics. That indicates there's more to people as individual minds than a single test can fully indicate.

That said, as the results posted here prove, even though we are all the same "personality", we remain individuals with those same identified traits. It's the psychological version of identifying the various skills and positions of an opposing sports team.

Says the "psychology major" who didn't even fucking know what the DSM was. Wow.

You and Cypress are too desperate to make people think you are smarter than you actually are. Funny that.
 
Says the "psychology major" who didn't even fucking know what the DSM was. Wow.

You and Cypress are too desperate to make people think you are smarter than you actually are. Funny that.
LOL You are free to believe whatever you like about me, Perry. Do you think it matters what I think of you or you think of me? What would be the point of spreading hate, lies or harm on an anonymous internet forum other than emotional release?

Why do you think so, Perry?

BTW, in some ways you remind me of Jakemax, but in other ways you remind me of another nutjob member of similar personality, also banned.

OTOH, text is a very shitty form of communication. Do you agree that intelligent, educated people can more easily alter their patterns of communication if they believe their message isn't getting through? Kind of a variation on the misattributed Einstein maxim about sanity.
 
Like you and TOP? Let's be honest, COgoat, would you do her if you could? A public answer is frought with problems regardless how you answer.

You, being a bit "off the beaten path", will not reply honestly because, IMO, you can't. That's not a "man challenge" like one of your KKK fellows uses, it's an observation. You follow a pattern to feed your needs.

Psychologically, that's normal. It's what "needs" you have that differentiates people and starts to draw lines of social behavior. Consider the personalities in the KKK vs. "The Nice Thread". Sum them up and consider the overall picture if you boiled it down to a "norm".

Where do you think the KKK would rate compared to TNT? On what scale?
If you don't understand the questions, that's okay. I'm just trying to measure where you are educationally and mentally. :)
I'm a simple man from the Midwest who gets by on common sense and a little help from my friends.
 
Dutch and Cypress need to get a room.

... or the base of a tree.

attachment.php
 
But the evidence I posted was. :). Just because you think you can get away with something doesn't mean you are successful.



Oh god...who the fuck cares? You've been an internet intellectual poseur for 17 years now! WOo hoo!



Until I caught you. Good for me!

You didn't post evidence. You posted an opinion.

On the other hand, I provided a link to where you obviously stole the syntax from a Wikipedia chemistry entry without attribution, and passed it off as your own words.

I don't care if you want to write I am a fake who has to parrot whatever Wikipedia says. I know you don't really believe that, because your obsession with me clearly is based on you thinking I am the standard against which you feel compelled to compete.


Now, my theory is that someone who is routinely changing screen names, posts under sock puppet accounts, gives differing biographical profiles, and bangs on their keyboard in ALL CAPS, huge font, Red type is someone who is deceptive, perpetually angry and unstable, and/or mentally ill.
 
Oh god...who the fuck cares?
You care, Perry. You care well past the point of obsession. You are obsessed with being seen as a PhD; to be seen as the most highly educated person on the forum. Too bad your aspirations exceed your grasp, son.

Quixotic
A person with ambitions or aspirations that far exceed their means or abilities would be quixotic. The term is a good fit because of its definition and because it brings to mind Don Quixote providing a mental picture of aspirations exceeding abilities.
 
You didn't post evidence. You posted an opinion.

On the other hand, I provided a link to where you obviously stole the syntax from a Wikipedia chemistry entry without attribution, and passed it off as your own words.

I don't care if you want to write I am a fake who has to parrot whatever Wikipedia says. I know you don't really believe that, because your obsession with me clearly is based on you thinking I am the standard against which you feel compelled to compete.


Now, my theory is that someone who is routinely changing screen names, posts under sock puppet accounts, gives differing biographical profiles, and bangs on their keyboard in ALL CAPS, huge font, Red type is someone who is deceptive, perpetually angry and unstable, and/or mentally ill.

I used a word from a Wikipedia article. One single word. A word that is quite commonly used.
 
You are obsessed with being seen as a PhD; to be seen as the most highly educated person on the forum.

You and Cypress are literally the ONLY people to obsess on my doctorate. I only ever mentioned it once in passing.

Seems like a bit of projection on your part and on Cypress' part. Now THAT'S interesting psychology.
 
What would be the point of spreading hate, lies or harm on an anonymous internet forum other than emotional release?

More projection from the forum's hate machine.

You are among the most hate-filled posters (calling everyone psychotic, and comparing them to various villains in history, oh and the "changing their posts" game you play where you make up stuff people said and then post that as the quote is an interesting hate game you play as well).

Funny but every accusation is a confession for you folks.
 
I used a word from a Wikipedia article. One single word. A word that is quite commonly used.

Nope, you're lying again. Look at the link again. You copied words, syntax, phrases from the Wikipedia chemistry entry, and tried to pass it off as your own words

When you posted as Jank, you practically paraphrased an entire Wikipedia article on quantum mechanics, passing it off as your own words.

I even pointed it out to you (Jank) at the time, because it was one of those cases where there was way to much detail and obscure minutiae to have come from Jank.
 
Back
Top