Republican claims 'legitimate rape' rarely results in pregnancy

Rep. Akin resists mounting calls to withdraw from Senate race after 'rape' comment

Missouri Republican Senate candidate Todd Akin resisted calls to withdraw from the race Monday over his controversial comments on rape, despite mounting pressure from GOP leaders who roundly condemned his remarks and threatened to cut off funding.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...icism-call-to-exit-senate-race/#ixzz2484HFLpz

this guy doesn't have many friends after that remark.....
 
I frankly cannot understand what the fuck you are on about, I've already stated that already. It is you that is too stupid to understand that and is determined to say otherwise. Is English your second language?

I'm 'on about' the fact that you're claiming this is something women 'allow'. They have no choice but to permit it if they want an abortion, despite the fact that the wanding is unnecessary. They have to submit to the invasive shaming in order to obtain the abortion.

I'm 'on about' the fact that you see nothing wrong with that. Correct? That's why you see it as something women are 'allowing'. Isn't that your point?
 
Rep. Akin resists mounting calls to withdraw from Senate race after 'rape' comment

Missouri Republican Senate candidate Todd Akin resisted calls to withdraw from the race Monday over his controversial comments on rape, despite mounting pressure from GOP leaders who roundly condemned his remarks and threatened to cut off funding.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...icism-call-to-exit-senate-race/#ixzz2484HFLpz

this guy doesn't have many friends after that remark.....

He's got Paul Ryan and the Tea Party.
 
These women are forced into the examination. There is no question about that. That was the purpose of the law.

Yes, if they want the abortion then they have to consent to, allow, accede to, cave in, concede, endorse, give the go-ahead, permit or yield to an internal examination with a probe.
 
Last edited:
I'm 'on about' the fact that you're claiming this is something women 'allow'. They have no choice but to permit it if they want an abortion, despite the fact that the wanding is unnecessary. They have to submit to the invasive shaming in order to obtain the abortion.

I'm 'on about' the fact that you see nothing wrong with that. Correct? That's why you see it as something women are 'allowing'. Isn't that your point?

No, and that is why I believe that you have severe comprehension issues, I never once said that I agreed with it, in fact I said the exact opposite. Yet you are still trying to get a gotcha, do you see why people think you are a blithering idiot?
 
No, and that is why I believe that you have severe comprehension issues, I never once said that I agreed with it, in fact I said the exact opposite. Yet you are still trying to get a gotcha, do you see why people think you are a blithering idiot?

Then what is your point with your emphasis on women "allowing" the procedure?
 
Yes, if they want the abortion then they have to consent to, allow, accede to, cave in, concede, endorse, give the go-ahead, permit or yield to an internal examination with a probe.

You keep saying "allow" when in fact if they want to get an abortion they are forced into a procedure THEY DON'T NEED OR WANT.

Not sure why this is such a problem for you when you claim that you disagree with the law.
 
You keep saying "allow" when in fact if they want to get an abortion they are forced into a procedure THEY DON'T NEED OR WANT.

Not sure why this is such a problem for you when you claim that you disagree with the law.

Does allow mean something different in US English? I treat you as intelligent so grant me the same favour. How about this then? Women in places like Virginia allow the procedure, under duress, as that is the only way to get an abortion.
 
No, and that is why I believe that you have severe comprehension issues, I never once said that I agreed with it, in fact I said the exact opposite. Yet you are still trying to get a gotcha, do you see why people think you are a blithering idiot?

lol...i doubt it
 
Yes, allowing in the sense that they are not physically forced to, excepting for the fact that the abortion would be refused otherwise. I know that you are looking for a gotcha here but I am totally against laws like the one passed by Virginia.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friend...gearing-up-to-probe-women-who-want-abortions/
Coercion in this case is rape. You have to submit to a form of rape with a medical instrument, against your will but forced on you if you want a legal medical procedure. You don't seem to have a clear understanding of what rape is unless there is physical force. The threat here is that you want an abortion but are unable to get it legally without submitting. Submission. That's what authoritarians want, submissive women and to force uppity women to submit.
 
Last edited:
Here is a case in point, the women are not forced to undergo an exam hence they are allowing it to happen, that is just simple English. It is you that's trying to put a spin on the meaning of the verb to allow. I have already stated that I am against the whole idea but you are determined to get a gotcha anyway.
That isn't true.
 
Is a woman or girl afraid for their lives or safety and subsequent apparent consent to intercourse allowing it or avoiding the alternative? I think they are either scared out of their minds, unclear as to what is happening to them and doing the very best they can while submitting only to the survival instinct. Rape is Rape whether with a penis, a tongue, a pencil or an instrument or anything else that a perpetrator/doctor or anyone else might want to use. This is not an either/or question.
 
I didn't dodge your question.

Yes, this will send more women Obama's way .. not just because of this one guy .. but because it reinforces what many already think of the Republican Party.

Add this to men .. republican men .. thinking they have the right to tell women what to do with their vagina's.

He was indeed inarticulate, however correct in that very few pregnancies result from rape.

The GOP should realize how this game is played. This has been part of the democrap play book for years.

GOP candidates always get these questions, but you never see democraps get questions like "do you support killing a baby once it is halfway outisde the vagina"

Every pro lifer should have the sme answer when the abortion question comes up from the left wing media "I believe life begins at conception"
 
When over 75% of Americans support women's rights to their own bodies and healthcare it wouldn't be meaningful to ask redundant questions concerning the subject of politicians that clearly embrace those issues. It is, however, very important to that over 75% to know just who those that would strip away those rights actually are. It's also important to those that agree with the stripping of rights away from fellow citizens to know as well. It gets them all excited to hear someone else that is as stupid as themselves and causes them to pee down their legs about it!!!!!!!
 
He was indeed inarticulate, however correct in that very few pregnancies result from rape.

The GOP should realize how this game is played. This has been part of the democrap play book for years.

GOP candidates always get these questions, but you never see democraps get questions like "do you support killing a baby once it is halfway outisde the vagina"

Every pro lifer should have the sme answer when the abortion question comes up from the left wing media "I believe life begins at conception"
The same percentage of pregnancies occur by rape as any other intercourse. The reptilian right seems to be under many 13th century misconceptions about the female body poor things.

Your last sentence is antichoice hyperbole at best....seriously flawed. All this does is expose those like you who are barely human.
 
Back
Top