Republicans running scared, Iraq War closer to its end.

And eminem is considered a white boy acting black. and tiger a black man acting white. They're fringe elements. People associate certain cultures WITH the color, and that's why they claim they judge.

America had villified blacks to assuage guilt over slavery. People invent theories of superiority to justify slavery, much like globalists assert that anyone who doesn't agree with them and acceptance of their totalitarian rule must just be stupid, and therefore destined to die in evolutionary process (the elites decision to kill them off).

CONSIDERED??? by whom? who cares. Frankly I don't know him -just of him.

Tiger is of mixed heritage, and so is obama, only bigots care which races, and Wlile I and quite straight I conmsider Tiger as one of beautiful people ---regardless of race.
 
Last edited:
ONSIDERED??? by whom? who cares. Frankly I don't know him -just of him.

Tiger is of mixed heritage, and so is obama, only bigots care which races, and Wlile I and quite straight I conmsider Tiger as one of ebeautiful people ---regardless of race.

I agree there are beutiful people of all races, and race mixes. Tiger's a top, what are you?
 
Back to the subject ...

Republicans continue to bail out .. like rats jumping ship

Senior GOP senator abandons Iraq policy
Thu Jul 5, 2007
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070705/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq_3

Sen. Pete Domenici on Thursday withdrew his support of President Bush's Iraq war policy and embraced a proposal to bring home most troops by March.

The longtime New Mexico senator is the latest of several Republican stalwarts who have abandoned Bush on Iraq in the past 10 days. They have urged a change sooner rather than later and further isolated the GOP president in his attempt to defend the unpopular war.

Last week, Sens. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and George Voinovich, R-Ohio, said the U.S. should significantly reduce its military presence in Iraq while bolstering diplomatic efforts. Sen. John Warner, R-Va., this month is expected to propose a new approach.

With Congress on its July Fourth break, Domenici made his views known Thursday, though he said he has not talked to the administration about wanting a strategy shift.

"I have carefully studied the Iraq situation and believe we cannot continue asking our troops to sacrifice indefinitely while the Iraqi government is not making measurable progress to move its country forward," he said.

"I do not support an immediate withdrawal from Iraq or a reduction in funding for our troops," Domenici said. "But I do support a new strategy that will move our troops out of combat operations and on the path to coming home."

Dominici was elected in 1972 and is a senior member of a panel that oversees defense spending. He said at a news conference that parents of those killed in Iraq previously told him the United States should stay in Iraq as long as it takes. Now, he said, some parents have asked him to do more to bring the troops home sooner.

The senator said the situation in Iraq is getting worse. He said he now supports a bipartisan bill that embraces the findings of the independent Iraq Study Group.

In December, the group said the primary mission of U.S. troops should evolve to supporting Iraqi security forces. The report also said the U.S. should reduce political, military or economic support for Iraq if the Baghdad government cannot make substantial progress.

The group said combat troops could be out by March 2008 if specific steps were taken.

The bill would make most of the group's findings official U.S. policy. The measure is also backed by Sens. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Ken Salazar, D-Colo.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Thursday it was time Republicans backed up their words with action and voted to bring troops home. The Senate will vote this month on several anti-war proposals, including cutting off money for combat and ordering troop withdrawals in four months.

Domenici and other Republicans are expected to oppose such proposals, while Democrats say the Iraq Study Group bill does not go far enough.

Bush has been losing GOP support for his decision in January to send an additional 21,500 combat troops to Iraq to secure Baghdad and Anbar province. Last weekend, the president called for patience as U.S. forces conduct stepped-up operations.

The White House had thought it had until September, when military commanders are to give an assessment of Iraq. But as the public becomes more frustrated with the war and the 2008 elections grow closer, the political pressure has risen.

Most senators now believe troops should start coming home within the next few months. House Republicans want to revive the independent Iraq Study Group to review its findings.

When Bush announced his plan in January to send more troops to Iraq, Domenici said he was willing to give the plan a chance. But he added that his support would be based on whether the Iraqi government would meet its obligations under the plan.

"It is the Iraqi government that is failing to make even modest progress to help Iraq itself or to merit the sacrifices being made by our men and women in uniform," Domenici said. "I am unwilling to continue our current strategy."
 
Hi Bac. Yes but, what is he going to do about it?

"I do not support an immediate withdrawal from Iraq or a reduction in funding for our troops," Domenici said. "But I do support a new strategy that will move our troops out of combat operations and on the path to coming home."

This sounds like a weasal statement to me. I see a lot of jabbering about breaking from bush on the war, but I think that they are just doing it in hopes of winning their individual elections. Figuring that their constituents won't notice they're not doing anything to stop the war, as long as they keep saying that they want to stop the war. After all, they've noticed before.
 
My take...

on all of the above liberal arguments...well my Grandaughter had made plans to attend one of the Military Academies after graduating from HS next year...after all of the liberal banter about the war...she told me...Hey Gramps I don't want to go through what you did as a kid..back in the day...called all those names and such...the pervs can fight their own war...not me...I said are you talking about those who support the war or those against it...she said those against the war..no way will I risk my life for ungratefuls...so she now is going to attend college locally (UNR) while working for the local SO..then she hopes to be accepted to the FBI academy after College Graduation..this will be her contribution to society as a whole..can't say I blame her for her decision!
 
Hi Bac. Yes but, what is he going to do about it?

"I do not support an immediate withdrawal from Iraq or a reduction in funding for our troops," Domenici said. "But I do support a new strategy that will move our troops out of combat operations and on the path to coming home."

This sounds like a weasal statement to me. I see a lot of jabbering about breaking from bush on the war, but I think that they are just doing it in hopes of winning their individual elections. Figuring that their constituents won't notice they're not doing anything to stop the war, as long as they keep saying that they want to stop the war. After all, they've noticed before.

Domenici, like some of the others, will weasel arond to find a way to put this on someone other than themselves .. but there's no way out, and the closer to the '08 elections we get, the faster they'll all come to the reality that withdrawal is all they have left.
 
Back
Top