Republicans running scared, Iraq War closer to its end.

I'm done...

gotta run..I will leave y'all to entertain yourselves for the rest of the night...see ya would not wanna be ya!;)
 
Pray tell, "WHAT real God???? and who is to say he doesn't beleive in the same God as you do ??because he has a different skin color??? And the other things you mentioned have nothing to do with skin color.

What is black culture?
 
It does happen...just read this forum...whites attack whites all the time...in the lib sector...just for minority approval...so stick your hard or was that soft 'F' where the sun no longer shines!
but that is not for being white. which was the comment. Your strawnmen don't work either.
 
it is a misnomer, there are may thing associated with Africa, and the Negroid race, which are there because of herritage, not skin color. and skin color is what we were talking about. Right???

Is blue man group a race?

It's not really about about color. It's about individuals feeling as if they are the "same" group of people. It's about identity as well. It's a little disingenuous to say it's as meaningless as color. Color is oftentimes an indicator the closer genetic relatedness.
 
who said it was meaningless? I certainly didn't. I said or at least implied)that race and color are not the same

No. You're saying what we call "race" is an insignificant concept, based only on pigment, and having no other meaning.


You've reduced one to the other.
 
Is blue man group a race?

It's not really about about color. It's about individuals feeling as if they are the "same" group of people. It's about identity as well. It's a little disingenuous to say it's as meaningless as color. Color is oftentimes an indicator the closer genetic relatedness.
who said race was meaningless. I certainly didn't. I said( or at least implied that race and color are NOT the same.

and equally, color sometmes is not such an indicator.
 
who said race was meaningless. I certainly didn't. I said( or at least implied that race and color are NOT the same.

and equally, color sometmes is not such an indicator.

Yes. In the case of albinos. I get it. Oh wow. Great argument.
 
No. You're saying what we call "race" is an insignificant concept, based only on pigment, and having no other meaning.


You've reduced one to the other.
You have simply misunderstood. Color is not race. you have three races. (much mixed today) with most negroids being darker that the other two races. Mongoid, Caucoid, and negroid. each having specific characteristics. pigmentation ranges from pale (even albino) to ebony. hues of red and yellow being environmantally based.. but in any event, the cultural traits you listed are Not color based, but as the term says. culturally based.
 
You have simply misunderstood. Color is not race. you have three races. (much mixed today) with most negroids being darker that the other two races. Mongoid, Caucoid, and negroid. each having specific characteristics. pigmentation ranges from pale (even albino) to ebony. hues of red and yellow being environmantally based.. but in any event, the cultural traits you listed are Not color based, but as the term says. culturally based.

Right. and it just so happens that historically it has been the case that the same sets of individuals who are in the same racial group tend to also be in the same cultural group. And finer than that there's even an "italian" look or a "russian" look, or an "irish" look. These also indicate and genetic component to their "national" ethnicity.
 
Right. and it just so happens that historically it has been the case that the same sets of individuals who are in the same racial group tend to also be in the same cultural group.

note your own word "TEND"-- not always, but "tend'


And finer than that there's even an "italian" look or a "russian" look, or an "irish" look.

I would disagree that they could be classified as such, but rather as an ethnic or racial characteristic.
These also indicate and genetic component to their "national" ethnicity.
Nonsense. Racial yes, national. no.
 
note your own word "TEND"-- not always, but "tend'




I would disagree that they could be classified as such, but rather as an ethnic or racial characteristic.
Nonsense. Racial yes, national. no.

Your endless dissembly is tedious. your intellect is a retardation generator.
 
No. You keep changing defintions. First you claim race is meaningless, just a color. Then you said you never said such a thing, and started making up more shit.
Ok, Ass, prove it, quote the post (the passage)where I said race was meaningless and just a color -and I don't mean in your erroneous misinterpetation and idiotic opinion. Show it in black and white.

You said it, now prove it.
 
Back
Top