Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Yes, every progressive I know of wants to bring back the 50s. Good catch, Middie!!
Post 35: answer the question.No ...
Yes, every progressive I know of wants to bring back the 50s. Good catch, Middie!!
'Here, read this, as it proves I'm right.'
You ran away from this discussion last time. Here's my response to the last time you broached this subject, which you then failed to answer.Isn't the radical right always screaming about the redistribution of wealth? Which way is the redistribution going? Its certainly not trickling down to the people who really need and will spend the money.
...how does taking money from one class of folks (who of course spend money) and giving it to a second class of folks (who spend money) increase overall wealth?
You ran away from this discussion last time. Here's my response to the last time you broached this subject, which you then failed to answer.
So according to you, wealth is limited? Is that your position?
response
noun
a verbal or written answer : without waiting for a response, she returned to her newspaper * we received 400 applications in response to one job ad.
• a written or verbal answer to a question in a test, questionnaire, survey, etc.
question
noun
a sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit information : we hope this leaflet has been helpful in answering your questions.
Your 'response' is a 'question' learn the difference.
I won't do your research for you.
To understand what I mean, start here...
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en...NOJMrGHg7fbSKS9E7RqubuyXk#v=onepage&q&f=false
I responded by ax'in a question. And, I still see that you're running away from it. Why are you afraid of the truth?
For the last time. Redistribution of wealth from the poor and middle class to the top 1% of Bush's Base is a bad thing. I've never agreed with it and never will. The results of this redistribution can be seen in our economy today-if you just take your head out of of your ass.
For the last time. Redistribution of wealth from the poor and middle class to the top 1% of Bush's Base is a bad thing. I've never agreed with it and never will. The results of this redistribution can be seen in our economy today-if you just take your head out of of your ass.
No well argued replies from the wingnuts on the right, but we expected that.
>
You retard, so now taxing rich folk less is taking away from the poor.
But you still failed to answer the question. How does taking money from rich folks (who of course spend money) and giving it to poor folks (who spend money) increase overall wealth?
Its going there for both reasons. US Corporate taxes are very high, and give an incentive to create companies based elsewhere, taking jobs with them.How do tax cuts for the rich increase overall wealth when the reason investment is going overseas is cheap labor, not taxes?
How do tax cuts for the rich increase overall wealth when the reason investment is going overseas is cheap labor, not taxes?
Its going there for both reasons. US Corporate taxes are very high, and give an incentive to create companies based elsewhere, taking jobs with them.
Its amazing that people don't understand these simple facts.It's amazing that you would even have to say this.
Post 35: answer the question.