Rittenhouse… likely not guilty.

[SmarterthanYou]

So what weapon was the shirtless Rosenbaum carrying that made Kyle so afraid for his life that he had to shoot Rosenbaum IN THE BACK?

first, tell me what you HEARD the narrator say, then tell me what you saw, according to the narrators words.....

let me just stop your blind insanity....rittenhouse heard a gunshot from behind him and as he turned around he saw Rosenbaum charging him......it's believable that Rosenbaum maybe shot at him and was definitely a threat by charging him......so Rosenbaum was shot...while he was charging him.........so one bullet hit him in the back..........you shoot til the threat is eliminated............standard firearms training.......

 

[Sirthinksalot]

While I blame the adults who misled him, our laws don't work like that. Kyle intentionally hooked up with a white supremacist terrorist group, intentionally armed himself and traveled far from home to insert himself into a protest then intentionally shot and killed two Americans scumbags, maimed a third and recklessly endangered others.

The only defense is "well, they were BLM". Like the Chauvin case, video and audio will play a major role. I also suspect his former militia buddies will testify for the State for lighter sentences in their own crimes.

I doubt Wisconsin's economy will come up in court. What will come up are the domestic terrorism problem and Kyle's actions that night.

Fixed that for you.

 

[LV426]

on his back

Because he tripped over his own two feet.

being threatened

No, being disarmed.

and he hit 3 of 5 shots

So reckless endangerment.

I don't see that as reckless.

You don't consider panic firing reckless? Wow.

If a cop had done that, he'd be praised as a hero for not hitting innocent bystanders.

So we should be thankful that Rittenhouse's aim wasn't worse?

the partisan shit you fuckers do is almost hilarious

You're defending someone who shot a guy in the back.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Yeah, but even before that was Rosenbaum's murder...shooting someone in the back is murder. Full stop.

Each shot will be examined. It was a fracas, Kyle wildly fired 5 shots and hit one guy at close range, not doubt, spinning him around for the third shot.

Still, he has to justify deadly force for each shot along with all the others shots he fired that night. I doubt he can. Ergo, Kyle is going to prison for a few of those charges even if the jury hangs on the murder charges.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You are the one who posted the ABC video and demanded that I watch it.

So I did, and the ABC video shows a shirtless and unarmed Rosenbaum being shot by Rittenhouse.

And we know Kyle shot him in the back because of the coroner's report.

Shooting someone in the back is murder, not self-defense.

1. AProudLefty posted the video.....albeit he did it not knowing what the narrator was saying because he says he's deaf........not a smart move on his part
2. you obviously muted the words of the narrator as she talked about shots being fired before Rosenbaum was shot.......
3. a single bullet him Rosenbaum in the back, after he'd already been hit twice in the chest..........
4. you're a partisan and blind individual resorting to the politics of this instead of being objective, something you aren't capable of anyway

 

[SmarterthanYou]

QED. You've betrayed your oath. Your choice.

eh, your opinion matters little......I know who I am and what I do and i'm comfortable with that, just like you appear to be comfortable with who you are......

 

[Dutch Uncle]

BLOWJOBS for $5

Fixed that for you

 

[LV426]

first, tell me what you HEARD the narrator say, then tell me what you saw, according to the narrators words

Rosenbaum wasn't carrying a weapon and was shirtless.

That's what the narration says.

The coroner's report on Rosenbaum shows that he was shot IN THE BACK.

So your boy shot a shirtless, unarmed man in the back.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

It is when you fire into a crowd.

You forget that Kyle is a terrorist, not a cop.

emotional appeals render you no credibility.......

why is a cops actions viewed differently than a civilian?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

want? no. see it as necessary? unfortunately, yes

Dude, you've lied so much on this forum over the past 18 months, I doubt you remember which ones you told and which ones you haven't.


No matter. If the Feds want to do something about your little Paintball Militia, it's their problem.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

emotional appeals render you no credibility.......

why is a cops actions viewed differently than a civilian?

It depends. If you really were smarter than me, you'd know that for a fact. Since you don't, then you are either lying or you're an idiot.


None of which absolve your Texas domestic terrorist actions.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Dude, you've lied so much on this forum over the past 18 months, I doubt you remember which ones you told and which ones you haven't.

No matter. If the Feds want to do something about your little Paintball Militia, it's their problem.

whatever makes you feel better about yourself, jody

 

[SmarterthanYou]

It depends. If you really were smarter than me, you'd know that for a fact. Since you don't, then you are either lying or you're an idiot.

None of which absolve your Texas domestic terrorist actions.

blah blah blah.......further proof you're a leftie by the idiotic notion that cops are 'highly trained'...........when that's the furthest thing from teh truth

 

[LV426]

rittenhouse heard a gunshot from behind him

Shot didn't come from Rosenbaum.

Rosenbaum was unarmed and shirtless.

and as he turned around he saw Rosenbaum charging him

And Kyle ran away, and Rosenbaum followed.

Until Rosenbaum stopped following him, turned around, and then was shot in the back.

it's believable that Rosenbaum maybe shot at him

No it isn't because Rosenbaum clearly has nothing in his hands, and he wasn't concealing anything either because THE DUDE HAD NO SHIRT ON.

Kyle also turned and looked behind himself as he was running so he could plainly see Rosenbaum wasn't carrying any weapon, much less a gun.

so Rosenbaum was shot...while he was charging him.........so one bullet hit him in the back.

LMAO!

Was that a magic bullet or something?

If he's charging Kyle, how does a bullet turn in mid-air and circle around someone's body to enter in the back?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

eh, your opinion matters little......I know who I am and what I do and i'm comfortable with that, just like you appear to be comfortable with who you are......

Another lie since you keep posting to me and responding to me.

You're a proven terrorist supporter, anti-Constitutional, anti-Marine Corps and a liar. All on one thread.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

blah blah blah.......further proof you're a leftie by the idiotic notion that cops are 'highly trained'...........when that's the furthest thing from teh truth

So, besides hating the Marine Corps, our country, the Constitution and blacks you also hate cops.

Why isn't that a surprise to me? Because I've known all of those things about you since last December.

 

[LV426]

1. AProudLefty posted the video.....albeit he did it not knowing what the narrator was saying because he says he's deaf........not a smart move on his part

STOP.

2. you obviously muted the words of the narrator as she talked about shots being fired before Rosenbaum was shot.......

Rosenbaum didn't fire those shots, nor was he even carrying a weapon.

The dude didn't even have a shirt on.

Kyle looked back over his shoulder a couple times as Rosenbaum followed him, so he could plainly see that Rosenbaum wasn't armed.

3. a single bullet him Rosenbaum in the back, after he'd already been hit twice in the chest..........

Exactly, which proves murderous intent.

It proves Kyle wasn't trying to defend himself, he was trying to kill Rosenbaum.

He already shot the guy twice in the chest, but then shoots him a third time IN THE BACK?

How is that self-defense?

4. you're a partisan and blind individual resorting to the politics of this instead of being objective, something you aren't capable of anyway

You're the one not being objective here...you're the one defending a guy who shoots people in the back.

 

[anonymoose]

How does that explain Kyle recklessly endangering a reporter who interviewed him earlier and another boystander?

He had no choice. He had to defend himself

 

[Dutch Uncle]

He had no choice. He had to defend himself

He had a choice. If you are recklessly shooting at someone you hated and I thought my life or the life of others was endangered, I'd have every right to empty my carry arm into you because you are obviously insane with rage and a threat to everyone around you.

Yes, even in the back depending how many people you are killing.

 

[anonymoose]

Of course. The best way to prevent someone from taking your gun is to shoot them in the back.

The medical examiner found that Rosenbaum was shot in the groin,

Consistent with rosenbaum grabbing the rifle.

back

Problematic for Kyle. Enough to convict?

and left hand.

Consistent with rosenbaum grabbing the rifle.