Rittenhouse… likely not guilty.

SmarterthanYou said:
start at the 1:55 mark, you'll see
Click to expand...

Kyle shot Rosenbaum in the back. That's what that video shows dude...

You're jumping to when Huber attacked him, but by that point, even in the video you have here, it is clear that Rosenbaum was shot in the back because he FALLS FORWARD ON THE GROUND.

Also, Rosenbaum was unarmed, so Kyle had no fear for his life in that moment.

Notice all the witnesses around there too!
 
SmarterthanYou said:
start at the 1:55 mark, you'll see
Click to expand...

So I went to the 1:55 mark and you know what I saw?

AN UNARMED MAN SHOT BY KYLE.

Rosenbaum didn't even have a shirt on, much less holding a weapon...so the dude was not a threat to Kyle.

Kyle shot him in the back, though.

Then Kyle confesses to shooting him, then runs as the crowd chases him to disarm him because he just shot an unarmed Rosenbaum IN THE BACK.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
well, I can't help you if you're that fucking blind............
Click to expand...

Rosenbaum was unarmed and shirtless when Kyle shot him three times, including in the back.

Kyle then tripped over his own clumsy feet, and then shot Huber who was trying to disarm him because Kyle had jus shot and killed someone IN THE BACK.

And it's not conclusive that Grosskreutz was holding a gun in that moment either. You can't tell what he was holding in that video...it could have been a phone. It could have been medical equipment. It could have been a stapler.

You assume it's a gun, but you don't know for sure. And whatever it was wasn't even pointed at Rittenhouse when Rittenhouse shot Grosskrantz.

Your boy is done.

That video does not help Kyle at all because it shows Rosenbaum to be unarmed and shirtless (AKA not a threat), when Kyle killed him.
 
LV426 said:
Rosenbaum was unarmed and shirtless when Kyle shot him three times, including in the back.

Kyle then tripped over his own clumsy feet, and then shot Huber who was trying to disarm him because Kyle had jus shot and killed someone IN THE BACK.
Click to expand...

Kyle was shooting blindly. This is where the reckless endangerment comes in.
 
LV426 said:
So I went to the 1:55 mark and you know what I saw?

AN UNARMED MAN SHOT BY KYLE.

Rosenbaum didn't even have a shirt on, much less holding a weapon...so the dude was not a threat to Kyle.

Kyle shot him in the back, though.

Then Kyle confesses to shooting him, then runs as the crowd chases him to disarm him because he just shot an unarmed Rosenbaum IN THE BACK.
Click to expand...

you're a blind moron..........end of story
 
LV426 said:
Rosenbaum was unarmed and shirtless when Kyle shot him three times, including in the back.

Kyle then tripped over his own clumsy feet, and then shot Huber who was trying to disarm him because Kyle had jus shot and killed someone IN THE BACK.

And it's not conclusive that Grosskreutz was holding a gun in that moment either. You can't tell what he was holding in that video...it could have been a phone. It could have been medical equipment. It could have been a stapler.

You assume it's a gun, but you don't know for sure. And whatever it was wasn't even pointed at Rittenhouse when Rittenhouse shot Grosskrantz.

Your boy is done.

That video does not help Kyle at all because it shows Rosenbaum to be unarmed and shirtless (AKA not a threat), when Kyle killed him.
Click to expand...

again, you're fucking blind, and probably deaf as well.........that is an ABC narrator describing the events in that video...but you ignored them because you're not capable of being objective
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Kyle was shooting blindly. This is where the reckless endangerment comes in.
Click to expand...

on his back, being threatened, under stress, and he hit 3 of 5 shots..........I don't see that as reckless. If a cop had done that, he'd be praised as a hero for not hitting innocent bystanders.......the partisan shit you fuckers do is almost hilarious
 
SmarterthanYou said:
again, you're fucking blind, and probably deaf as well..e
Click to expand...

You are the one who posted the ABC video and demanded that I watch it.

So I did, and the ABC video shows a shirtless and unarmed Rosenbaum being shot by Rittenhouse.

And we know Kyle shot him in the back because of the coroner's report.

Shooting someone in the back is murder, not self-defense.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
on his back, being threatened, under stress, and he hit 3 of 5 shots..........I don't see that as reckless. If a cop had done that, he'd be praised as a hero for not hitting innocent bystanders.......the partisan shit you fuckers do is almost hilarious
Click to expand...

It is when you fire into a crowd.

You forget that Kyle is a terrorist, not a cop.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
hat is an ABC narrator describing the events in that video
Click to expand...

And she literally says that Rosenbaum is shirtless, isn't carrying a weapon, and falls to the ground after Kyle shot him.

And we know Kyle was intending to murder Rosenbaum because he shot Rosenbaum in the back.

That's what the narration says, dude.

Your boy is done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top