Salvation Army Wants White Donors to Offer “Sincere Apology” for Their Racism
- Thread starter Earl
- Start date
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
OP link comes up 404. Not much to work with there.
Not a good look, bluzman61 That's right, I know that's you. Say "hai" to Ropey for me.
I could sock in anytime there, but they banned my main, and there's no point in doing that.
FCT did that. He's a peckerhead.
https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/bluzman61-get-in-the-ring.819480/page-5
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
It's fascinating watching those two go hammer and tongs at each other, most entertaining.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
She doesn't seem to been anywhere judging by her appalling lack of knowledge about the world.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
Stupid motherfucker doper thinks it's still 1963!!!!
All that shit began going by the wayside half a century ago, panty-pisser.
Since the lae 1960's, the 1970's and 1980's, society changed drastically in this country.
All that lunch counter shit is ancent history and affects nobody today in 2021.
The only thing that is expected of black people is to pick up the ball and run with it.
But as yet, they haven't done so to the degree they need to.
A true equal place in society comes to those who earn it.
You cannot just bestow equality onto a group of people who continue to fight and work against you.
In case you have not noticed before, there are still a lot of black people who hate white people just for being white, which aparently, is not a problem in your mind.
Do they have a reason to?
That is up to each individual.
But as a people... as a whole... blacks are NOT oppressed in ths country.
And CERTAINLY not the way many of them, along with the progessives and The SA would have us believe.
.
Last edited:
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Thank you, Legion. The 1621 stuff is what Thanksgiving is about. We're not starving. Everything was great today for me.
"“Our harvest being gotten in…we might after a special manner rejoice together, after we had gathered the fruits of our labors…many of the Indians coming amongst us, and amongst the rest their greatest king Massasoit, with some ninety men, whom for three days we entertained and feasted…And although it be not always so plentiful, as it was at this time with us, yet by the goodness of God, we are so far from want.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/reality-requisite-national-thanksgiving/
Last edited:
And here's where the Salvation Army says exactly what DEMOCRAT doper claims they didn't:
Apology appears 9 times in the document.
Sincere appears 4 times.
Racism appears 224 times.
Put them together, and what do you get?
"And as we engage in conversations about race and racism, we must keep in mind that sincere repentance and apologies are necessary if we want to move towards racial reconciliation".
https://s3.amazonaws.com/cache.salv...Talk%20About...%20Racism%20COMPLETE%20SET.pdf
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
the most exciting thing that happens except during deer hunting season is watching trees grow.........during deer hunting season you get to see the hunters visiting bars and popup stripper joints and you get to cut the intestines out of your deer........
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
And here's where the Salvation Army says exactly what DEMOCRAT doper claims they didn't:
Apology appears 9 times in the document.
Sincere appears 4 times.
Racism appears 224 times.
Put them together, and what do you get?
"And as we engage in conversations about race and racism, we must keep in mind that sincere repentance and apologies are necessary if we want to move towards racial reconciliation".
https://s3.amazonaws.com/cache.salv...Talk%20About...%20Racism%20COMPLETE%20SET.pdf
Donate money to Shriners or Moffitt or The Danny Thomas thing instead?
I'm for Shriners and Ronald McDonald House. They do good things and don't require wokeness. Just a good heart and a willingness.
If fat-ass Fowl wandered into the woods while Ted Nugent was after game, that would get pretty exciting.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
.
John McWhorter is describing the likes of Dumber666 to a tee, they are all the same; sanctimonious, hectoring and odious.
The professor John McWhorter has problems with the way Americans are talking about race and racism.
McWhorter is a Black liberal. But he argues that the cultural left, along with major institutions and companies, have gone too far in embracing "anti-racist" ideas.
Much of it relates to the way two prominent writers about race have influenced public opinion about racism. Ibram X. Kendi's How to Be an Antiracist and Robin DiAngelo's White Fragility have both landed on bestseller lists since last summer, after widespread protests erupted over George Floyd's killing.
Both Kendi and DiAngelo have appeared on NPR and NPR has published articles that promote anti-racism.
McWhorter argues that certain strains of anti-racism and its adherents have effectively created a religion, and a zealous one, that stifles nuance and debate. His new book is called Woke Racism: How a New Religion Has Betrayed Black America.
There are people "whose devotion is less to changing lives for people who need help than showing that they understand that racism and especially systemic racism exists," McWhorter tells Morning Edition.
"The idea is that you are to be fired" if you disagree or violate anti-racism's norms, in McWhorter's telling. "You are to be dismissed from polite society. You are to be sanctioned. You can't be among us. You're dirty."
McWhorter points to the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art's chief curator, who resigned under pressure after an uproar involving his use of the words "reverse discrimination." In another case, he points to white food writer Alison Roman, who was suspended from her New York Times column after criticizing celebrities Chrissy Teigen, who is Asian American, and Marie Kondo, who is Asian.
Why is it that you assert that people who are pushing a particular kind of anti-racism are practicing something like a religion? Part of many religions is that at a certain point, you're supposed to suspend disbelief. At a certain point, you're supposed to stop using logic and you're just supposed to, for example, believe. You're just supposed to have faith. That is the way this new anti-racism goes in many cases. ...
This is a religion where instead of it being about your faith in Jesus, it's about showing that you know that racism exists above all else, including basic compassion. That's religious.
And then also, the way we talk about white privilege is eerily consonant with the way one talks about original sin. You have it from the beginning, it's a stain that you'll never get rid of. You're supposed to always think about it. It's there regardless of the condition of your life, and you're going to die with it. So white privilege becomes the original sin that you're supposed to live in a kind of atonement for.
Yes. It's funny, I'm grappling with this idea that the response to me is to say "he doesn't know systemic racism exists." I think part of it is that that's a very clumsy term. Yes, I know that those inequities exist. I think that those inequities must be battled. The issue is, what do you do to battle them? And I say, telling people not to be racist or thinking of those inequities as some abstract version of bigotry doesn't help people who need help.
Would you also argue to lower the penalty for racist speech? That essentially people should be a little more accepting of unacceptable language by other people and just be willing to debate them rather than push them off the stage.
I think that there's an extent to which any society is going to have taboos, and that taboos can be useful. But I also think that we are tending to take that sort of thing a little too far in the name of the idea that our job is to signal that we know racism exists.
And so, yeah, I kind of like the way it was about 20, maybe 15 years ago. But we've gotten to the point that we're so focused on what people say and how they say it that we're paying more attention to that than to the perhaps less glamorous work of getting out on the ground and trying to change society.
We have to think about, say, 50 years ago when people who felt very modern were doing civil rights activism in a real way. It would have looked very peculiar to them that we're so concerned with what things are called. There was a little of it, but not nearly as much as there is now. It's because, to an extent, policing language is easier. Civil rights activism is not glamorous in terms of what really creates change. ... I want to help people, and I'm very interested in policies that change Black lives. And I'm seeing a distraction from that.
Glenn Youngkin, the Republican who just won the governor's race in Virginia, made education and allegations of woke racism, as you would put it, part of his campaign. He sometimes quoted Martin Luther King on his side of the argument about equality, regardless of race. Do you think that Martin Luther King would be on your side of the argument?
I have no doubt that Martin Luther King would have understood what I'm saying in terms of helping people who actually need help. It's not an accident that at the end of his life, he was beginning to focus more on poverty in general than on the race question.
The idea is to help people who need help. The modern idea that microaggressions and how white people feel in their heart of hearts is what we should be thinking about to me is a detour. Frankly, the left has to get more honest about this sort of thing. If you want to say that Youngkin has exploited a certain kind of sentiment and maybe sometimes even racist sentiment, there's an argument there.
But for the left to say that there's nothing going on in schools that we need to talk about, that critical race theory isn't in the schools because nobody's teaching the papers of Richard Delgado and Kimberlé Crenshaw — that's a debate team feint. There is something going on in terms of how children are being taught in a lot of schools, and to pretend that it's not true, or to quietly think that that's the way it should be and so therefore we shouldn't talk about it as a new development: that doesn't work. There's a certain kind of maybe, regrettably, imperfect voter who is not fooled by that. And it's time for a more honest conversation.
https://www.npr.org/2021/11/05/1052...-woke-racism-attacks-leading-thinkers-on-race
John McWhorter is describing the likes of Dumber666 to a tee, they are all the same; sanctimonious, hectoring and odious.
The professor John McWhorter has problems with the way Americans are talking about race and racism.
McWhorter is a Black liberal. But he argues that the cultural left, along with major institutions and companies, have gone too far in embracing "anti-racist" ideas.
Much of it relates to the way two prominent writers about race have influenced public opinion about racism. Ibram X. Kendi's How to Be an Antiracist and Robin DiAngelo's White Fragility have both landed on bestseller lists since last summer, after widespread protests erupted over George Floyd's killing.
Both Kendi and DiAngelo have appeared on NPR and NPR has published articles that promote anti-racism.
McWhorter argues that certain strains of anti-racism and its adherents have effectively created a religion, and a zealous one, that stifles nuance and debate. His new book is called Woke Racism: How a New Religion Has Betrayed Black America.
There are people "whose devotion is less to changing lives for people who need help than showing that they understand that racism and especially systemic racism exists," McWhorter tells Morning Edition.
"The idea is that you are to be fired" if you disagree or violate anti-racism's norms, in McWhorter's telling. "You are to be dismissed from polite society. You are to be sanctioned. You can't be among us. You're dirty."
McWhorter points to the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art's chief curator, who resigned under pressure after an uproar involving his use of the words "reverse discrimination." In another case, he points to white food writer Alison Roman, who was suspended from her New York Times column after criticizing celebrities Chrissy Teigen, who is Asian American, and Marie Kondo, who is Asian.
Why is it that you assert that people who are pushing a particular kind of anti-racism are practicing something like a religion? Part of many religions is that at a certain point, you're supposed to suspend disbelief. At a certain point, you're supposed to stop using logic and you're just supposed to, for example, believe. You're just supposed to have faith. That is the way this new anti-racism goes in many cases. ...
This is a religion where instead of it being about your faith in Jesus, it's about showing that you know that racism exists above all else, including basic compassion. That's religious.
And then also, the way we talk about white privilege is eerily consonant with the way one talks about original sin. You have it from the beginning, it's a stain that you'll never get rid of. You're supposed to always think about it. It's there regardless of the condition of your life, and you're going to die with it. So white privilege becomes the original sin that you're supposed to live in a kind of atonement for.
Yes. It's funny, I'm grappling with this idea that the response to me is to say "he doesn't know systemic racism exists." I think part of it is that that's a very clumsy term. Yes, I know that those inequities exist. I think that those inequities must be battled. The issue is, what do you do to battle them? And I say, telling people not to be racist or thinking of those inequities as some abstract version of bigotry doesn't help people who need help.
Would you also argue to lower the penalty for racist speech? That essentially people should be a little more accepting of unacceptable language by other people and just be willing to debate them rather than push them off the stage.
I think that there's an extent to which any society is going to have taboos, and that taboos can be useful. But I also think that we are tending to take that sort of thing a little too far in the name of the idea that our job is to signal that we know racism exists.
And so, yeah, I kind of like the way it was about 20, maybe 15 years ago. But we've gotten to the point that we're so focused on what people say and how they say it that we're paying more attention to that than to the perhaps less glamorous work of getting out on the ground and trying to change society.
We have to think about, say, 50 years ago when people who felt very modern were doing civil rights activism in a real way. It would have looked very peculiar to them that we're so concerned with what things are called. There was a little of it, but not nearly as much as there is now. It's because, to an extent, policing language is easier. Civil rights activism is not glamorous in terms of what really creates change. ... I want to help people, and I'm very interested in policies that change Black lives. And I'm seeing a distraction from that.
Glenn Youngkin, the Republican who just won the governor's race in Virginia, made education and allegations of woke racism, as you would put it, part of his campaign. He sometimes quoted Martin Luther King on his side of the argument about equality, regardless of race. Do you think that Martin Luther King would be on your side of the argument?
I have no doubt that Martin Luther King would have understood what I'm saying in terms of helping people who actually need help. It's not an accident that at the end of his life, he was beginning to focus more on poverty in general than on the race question.
The idea is to help people who need help. The modern idea that microaggressions and how white people feel in their heart of hearts is what we should be thinking about to me is a detour. Frankly, the left has to get more honest about this sort of thing. If you want to say that Youngkin has exploited a certain kind of sentiment and maybe sometimes even racist sentiment, there's an argument there.
But for the left to say that there's nothing going on in schools that we need to talk about, that critical race theory isn't in the schools because nobody's teaching the papers of Richard Delgado and Kimberlé Crenshaw — that's a debate team feint. There is something going on in terms of how children are being taught in a lot of schools, and to pretend that it's not true, or to quietly think that that's the way it should be and so therefore we shouldn't talk about it as a new development: that doesn't work. There's a certain kind of maybe, regrettably, imperfect voter who is not fooled by that. And it's time for a more honest conversation.
https://www.npr.org/2021/11/05/1052...-woke-racism-attacks-leading-thinkers-on-race
Last edited:
Stupid motherfucker doper thinks it's still 1963!!!!
All that shit began going by the wayside half a century ago, panty-pisser.
Since the lae 1960's, the 1970's and 1980's, society changed drastically in this country.
All that lunch counter shit is ancent history and affects nobody today in 2021.
The only thing that is expected of black people is to pick up the ball and run with it.
But as yet, they haven't done so to the degree they need to.
A true equal place in society comes to those who earn it.
You cannot just bestow equality onto a group of people who continue to fight and work against you.
In case you have not noticed before, there are still a lot of black people who hate white people just for being white, which aparently, is not a problem in your mind.
Do they have a reason to?
That is up to each individual.
But as a people... as a whole... blacks are NOT oppressed in ths country.
And CERTAINLY not the way many of them, along with the progessives and The SA would have us believe.
.
Illiterate fuck can’t comprehend simple English and he thinks he can absorb what the SA document contains. Just fucking priceless!
That lesson plan was intended for idiots just EXACTLY like you. Ignorant, racist and in denial.
REPENT, MOTHERFUCKER.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Illiterate fuck can’t comprehend simple English and he thinks he can absorb what the SA document contains. Just fucking priceless!
That lesson plan was intended for idiots just EXACTLY like you. Ignorant, racist and in denial.
REPENT, MOTHERFUCKER.
Nauseating, sanctimonious, hectoring, obnoxious
cunt.
Last edited:
And here's where the Salvation Army says exactly what DEMOCRAT doper claims they didn't:
Apology appears 9 times in the document.
Sincere appears 4 times.
Racism appears 224 times.
Put them together, and what do you get?
"And as we engage in conversations about race and racism, we must keep in mind that sincere repentance and apologies are necessary if we want to move towards racial reconciliation".
https://s3.amazonaws.com/cache.salv...Talk%20About...%20Racism%20COMPLETE%20SET.pdf
Here’s the entire quote, stupid fuck. Repentance is one of those concepts for you “Christian” cocksuckers. It must go hand in hand with apologies. It doesn’t say you have to apologize to a black person. Or even apologize for something you’ve done.
But then again, none of you illiterate fucks can seem to comprehend the text.
“True repentance is a decision to move away from sin and towards God. As believers, apology and forgiveness are not only a universal human need but are Kingdom values that Scripture points to as key to opening doors to healing in even the most difficult circumstances. And as we engage in conversations about race and racism, we must keep in mind that sincere repentance and apologies are necessary if we want to move towards racial reconciliation. We recognize that it is a profound challenge to sit on the hot seat and listen with an open heart to the hurt and anger of the wounded. Yet, we are all hardwired to desire justice and fairness, so the need to receive a sincere apology is necessary. We are also imperfect human beings and prone to error and defensiveness, so the challenge of offering a heartfelt apology permeates almost every relationship.
Perhaps you don’t feel as if you personally have done anything wrong, but you can spend time repenting on behalf of the Church and asking for God to open hearts and minds to the issue of racism. Perhaps God spoke to you during your time of lament, and you have an idea of what you need to repent and apologize for. Please take time to write out or think about how you can repent and apologize (referring back to the six questions at the beginning of this session).”
REPENT, MOTHERFUCKER.
Indeed.
And here's where the Salvation Army says exactly what DEMOCRAT doper claims they didn't:
Apology appears 9 times in the document.
Sincere appears 4 times.
Racism appears 224 times.
Put them together, and what do you get?
"And as we engage in conversations about race and racism, we must keep in mind that sincere repentance and apologies are necessary if we want to move towards racial reconciliation".
https://s3.amazonaws.com/cache.salv...Talk%20About...%20Racism%20COMPLETE%20SET.pdf
Session four of "Let's Talk About Racism."
"Yet, we are all hardwired
to desire justice and fairness, so the need to
receive a sincere apology is necessary."
Exactly. Tom always forgets (or pretends to at any rate) that I lived most of my live in St. Louis, a place much more diverse than any of the hovel he calls home. Only a racist would believe that someone chooses to retire to an area because of its racial composition. When he choose to become a kept man in an Asian country, betcha it wasn't for racial reasons either, eh? lol