Same-sex couples begin marrying

DamnYankee said:
First of all, it's Merriam Webster, dumbass. And they say its a behavior.

I am not the one "not letting" queers marry. I was one of millions who voted against having my state license the activity. Queers can move to your state and you can marry them.
Click to expand...

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/homosexuality

"ho·mo·sex·u·al·i·tynoun \ˌhō-mə-ˌsek-shə-ˈwal-ət-ē\ (Medical Dictionary)
plural ; ho·mo·sex·u·al·i·ties
Medical Definition of HOMOSEXUALITY
1: the quality or state of being homosexual
2: erotic activity with another of the same sex
homosexualitynoun (Concise Encyclopedia)
Sexual interest in and attraction to members of one's own sex. Female homosexuality is frequently referred to as lesbianism; the word gay is often used as an alternative for both “homosexual” and “lesbian,” though it may refer specifically to male homosexuality."
 
pisskop said:
Whether or not the government should have a say in the matter is not what Im debating. That requires a different debate. For now it's enough that some see it as a choice.

In addition, the government is not saying people cannot be homosexual. The government(s) were/are saying marriage is not legally recognized between two people of the same sex.


Why, just the other day a birth certificate was changed to allow 3 people to be listed as the parents.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/florida-ju...tificate-listing-three-parents-233555185.html
Click to expand...


Your claim, that there are not those who want the government to say people cannot be homosexual, is inaccurate. Scalia has made it pretty clear that he would overturn Lawrence vs Texas.
 
patriot66 said:
Post 211, if that does not infer I want a theology, well your use of the English language is sorely lacking
Click to expand...

Post #211: "So you say. But your post is also exactly why the founding fathers took steps to make sure religious zealots could not pervert our nation into a theocracy.

If you and your church choose to believe what is written in a single volume, more power to you. But to expect this enture nation to base its laws on that single volume, to the exclusion of all other religious texts, is ridiculous beyond belief."

Your post DOES show why the founding fathers took steps to make sure religious zealots could not pervert our nation into a theocracy. It does not show that I said you wanted a theocracy. In a theocracy, the idea that you put forward would be embraced. Such a theocracy would be dangerous. But no, I did not say you wanted a theocracy. I said your idea is one that a theocracy would want.
 
Rana said:
Has got to be it. I love women, but the thought of having sex with one has the effect on me that watermelon has on Jarod. I just can't do it.
Click to expand...

So true. There's a huge difference between checking out their style or looking at their hair and makeup, and getting nekkid with them!
 
WinterBorn said:
My argument was that homosexuality is natural. It may not be the dominant sexuality, but since it happens in several species, it is not unnatural.
Click to expand...

It is such a new study,we will learn more as it is examined and researched but biologist think it has evolutionary purposes.
 
Just like I said earlier dumbass, M-W lists it as a behavior. Making the test bigger doesn't change its meaning.

And it's not natural. If its been found in isolated cases of non-human species it's because they were stressed through human intervention.
 
DamnYankee said:
Just like I said earlier dumbass, M-W lists it as a behavior. Making the test bigger doesn't change its meaning.

And it's not natural. If its been found in isolated cases of non-human species it's because they were stressed through human intervention.
Click to expand...

You mean the text? If you are going to call someone names because of spelling, you should check your own posts more carefully.
 
WinterBorn said:
You mean the text? If you are going to call someone names because of spelling, you should check your own posts more carefully.
Click to expand...

They are not isolated incidents and homosexuality occurs in over 150 species. I have Stanky on ignore, but saw his post to you. He is using outdated information.
 
pisskop said:
I made no mention of wants or sentiments. Legally there is no law declaring it illegal to be gay.
Click to expand...

Are you just parsing words? There are laws intending to outlaw homosexual acts. They are not enforceable due to Lawrence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_laws_in_the_United_States

I have no doubt that the religious reich in this country would stone homosexuals if there was not a strong presence of those favoring secular laws. It's only because freaks like dy/ila and the rest are abnormal, impotent and powerless little trolls that our laws are civil. Eventually, you will retreat on marriage too.
 
Rana said:
They are not isolated incidents and homosexuality occurs in over 150 species. I have Stanky on ignore, but saw his post to you. He is using outdated information.
Click to expand...

Higher brain functioning animals have sex for pleasure. The bonobos are one such primate. Females mate with males for reproduction, but females prefer other females for pleasure.
 
Damn Southerner is a moron because he can't spell. I find this thread highly ironic, because DS makes an exception to hating gays if they served in the Confederate military (which was majority fag)...
 
Superfreak said:
Actually it IS natural. You simply refuse to believe that because it goes against your religious indoctrination.

Again... WHEN did you CHOOSE to be straight?
Click to expand...

I was naturally inclined by my genetic make up as a male, to be attracted to females, had I sought men, that would be a CHOICE to go against what is natural.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top