Same-sex couples begin marrying

WinterBorn said:
We were discussing what is "natural", not what is logical. I am quite serious. The fact that numerous species of animals practice homosexuality is obvious evidence that it is natural.
Click to expand...

Your argument is silly, animals do not process right, and wrong, the same way we do and have no understanding of sin, it is pure animal behavior.
 
Threedee said:
Damn Southerner is a moron because he can't spell. I find this thread highly ironic, because DS makes an exception to hating gays if they served in the Confederate military (which was majority fag)...
Click to expand...
Since the Confederacy was controlled by the Democrat Party I feel no reason to dispute your claim, however baseless. What you fail to understand is that the part of The South that I have chosen to live and raise my issue is not and never has been supportive of the Democrat Party.
 
DamnYankee said:
I've called you a dumbass for years, not because of your spelling but because you are a dumbass, dumbass.
Click to expand...

Be careful. The one you are calling "Dumbass" has shredded your argument on at least two topics.

But the fact remains, you made a point about spelling and then didn't spell a simple word correctly. I find that amusing.
 
WinterBorn said:
Post #211: "So you say. But your post is also exactly why the founding fathers took steps to make sure religious zealots could not pervert our nation into a theocracy.

If you and your church choose to believe what is written in a single volume, more power to you. But to expect this enture nation to base its laws on that single volume, to the exclusion of all other religious texts, is ridiculous beyond belief."

Your post DOES show why the founding fathers took steps to make sure religious zealots could not pervert our nation into a theocracy. It does not show that I said you wanted a theocracy. In a theocracy, the idea that you put forward would be embraced. Such a theocracy would be dangerous. But no, I did not say you wanted a theocracy. I said your idea is one that a theocracy would want.
Click to expand...

Explain all you want doesn't change what you originally said you inferred I wanted a theocracy, I do not, nor do I want the Government to infringe on my rights.
 
DamnYankee said:
This is the old 'morals are fluid' argument that fails every time it's tried.
Click to expand...

1) This has absoultly nothing to do with morals.
2) Morals are fluid.
3) Even if your personal morals are fixed, they are not everyone's morals.
 
patriot66 said:
Your argument is silly, animals do not process right, and wrong, the same way we do and have no understanding of sin, it is pure animal behavior.
Click to expand...

Right and wrong is not the same thing as natural and unnatural.

Flying in an airplane is not natural, does that make it wrong?
 
DamnYankee said:
Since the Confederacy was controlled by the Democrat Party I feel no reason to dispute your claim, however baseless. What you fail to understand is that the part of The South that I have chosen to live and raise my issue is not and never has been supportive of the Democrat Party.
Click to expand...

The Democrats and Republicans switched places since 1870. On almost every issue.
 
patriot66 said:
Explain all you want doesn't change what you originally said you inferred I wanted a theocracy, I do not, nor do I want the Government to infringe on my rights.
Click to expand...

So don't advocate making laws based solely on religious dogma. Doing that is instituting a theocracy, however limited it may be.

But no, I did not infer that you wanted a theocracy.
 
Jarod said:
The Democrats and Republicans switched places since 1870. On almost every issue.
Click to expand...
Yes I've heard that theory before; it has no basis in fact. Keep repeating the lie though as I find it incredibly amusing that you would believe it.
 
You've never dented any of my arguments never mind "shredded" any of them. I do find that terribly amusing though, in fact my sides are now hurting.
 
Jarod said:
1) This has absoultly nothing to do with morals.
2) Morals are fluid.
3) Even if your personal morals are fixed, they are not everyone's morals.
Click to expand...

Actually I'm curious why you think morals can be fluid. Is this a politician's standpoint or a sophist idea; or something else?
 
pisskop said:
Actually I'm curious why you think morals can be fluid. Is this a politician's standpoint or a sophist idea; or something else?
Click to expand...
It's standard liberal pap. Morality requires people to be personal responsible and above everything else liberals despise personal responsibility.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top