Science from the other side of Climate Change

Is that so?
Yes. He can say that because he believes that it is literally impossible for the "climate" to change. Why can't the climate change? Because there is no single measurement of climate, therefore it can't change. Apparently not having a single measure of something means that it is impossible for it to change?

I know... The word games are exhausting.
 
that's exactly also why your arguments are bad.

his approach is effective.

you're an imbecile.
His approach is playing dumb.. playing word games.

There's no single measure of health, but any person with two brain cells to rub together can recognize that there's a difference between a very healthy person and a very unhealthy person, based on individual factors.
 
His approach is playing dumb.. playing word games.

There's no single measure of health, but any person with two brain cells to rub together can recognize that there's a difference between a very healthy person and a very unhealthy person, based on individual factors.
you admitted there's no meaningful measure.

he won.

he beat you.

now stfu.
 
you admitted there's no meaningful measure.

he won.

he beat you.

now stfu.
I said nothing about a meaningful measure. I said no SINGLE measure. That is the basis for his word games.

Of course, even if there were a single measure for health or climate, it wouldn't matter. The word game would just shift to a new form of game playing.
 
Last edited:
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth nor the global atmospheric content of CO2.

Climate cannot change. Go learn English.

CO2 has no capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing, Twilight.

Neither has any capability to warm the Earth, Twilight. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics again.

Define 'excess'.

Define 'excess'

Carbon dioxide is not a force. Water vapor is not a force.

Denying theories of science isn't science, Twilight. Your religion isn't science.

No such measure. Buzzword fallacy.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

CO2 is not a force. Climate is not a force.

Argument from randU fallacy. Making up random numbers and using them as 'data' is a fallacy.

Argument from randU fallacy.
Still hammering on this shit? Wow you are incapable of thought.
 
I doubt the validity of the ‘settled science’ that claims humans have created a 'climate crisis'.

I doubt that undemocratic 'Net Zero policies' will have any impact on global temperature.

I doubt the validity of the idea that US citizens should be made poorer in order to fund 'climate change' initiatives in 'developing countries', some of whom are actually wealthy.

I doubt that America surrendering its sovereignty to the UN to 'save the planet' is a good thing,

I doubt that banning plastic straws and doubling the use of plastics in the manufacture of EVs will stop the climate changing.

I doubt that poor people are emigrating to richer countries because they're fleeing 'global warming'.

I doubt that paying more taxes will cause any change in the world's climate.

I doubt that the carbon credit scheme that makes people like Al Gore richer, will affect the climate.

I doubt that employing poor children to mine lithium will 'save the planet'.

I doubt that large global farming conglomerates pushing small farmers out of business will make the climate cooler.

I doubt that unreliable renewable energy will be cheaper because my taxes are subsidizing it.

I doubt that selective funding of climate science is in the interests of informed choice or democracy.
You sure do doubt a lot of science you don’t understand
 
I said nothing about a meaningful measure. I said no SINGLE measure. That is the basis for his word games.

Of course, even if there were a single measure for health or climate, it wouldn't matter. The word game would just shift to a new form of game playing.
and therefore no meaningful measure.
 
The measures are individual components - temperature, frequency of heat waves, frequency of severe weather, etc.
no consistency.

people can just choose whatever numbers to show an agenda.....

that's not science.

repeatability is key.
 
I doubt that undemocratic 'Net Zero policies' will have any impact on global temperature.
Instead of doubting, you can be certain that "Net Zero Policies" will have no impact on earth's average global equilibrium temperature.

I doubt that America surrendering its sovereignty to the UN to 'save the planet' is a good thing,
Instead of doubting, you can be certain that America surrendering its sovereignty to the UN to 'save the planet' is a very bad idea.

I doubt that banning plastic straws and doubling the use of plastics in the manufacture of EVs will stop the climate changing.
Instead of doubting, you can be certain that there is no global climate to change.

I doubt that poor people are emigrating to richer countries because they're fleeing 'global warming'.
You can be certain that there is no such thing as Global Warming or greenhouse effect. Also, there is no such thing as something that is global, but only found in certain places on the globe, but not in others.

I doubt that paying more taxes will cause any change in the world's climate.
The opposite. Abolishing the income tax and going to a full tariff-based revenue will create a much happier climate.

I doubt that selective funding of climate science is in the interests of informed choice or democracy.
You can be certain that there is no science "Climate Science."
 
Instead of doubting, you can be certain that "Net Zero Policies" will have no impact on earth's average global equilibrium temperature. Instead of doubting, you can be certain that America surrendering its sovereignty to the UN to 'save the planet' is a very bad idea. Instead of doubting, you can be certain that there is no global climate to change. You can be certain that there is no such thing as Global Warming or greenhouse effect. Also, there is no such thing as something that is global, but only found in certain places on the globe, but not in others. The opposite. Abolishing the income tax and going to a full tariff-based revenue will create a much happier climate. You can be certain that there is no science "Climate Science."

Because ...
 
Yes. He can say that because he believes that it is literally impossible for the "climate" to change.
Climate cannot change, Void.
Why can't the climate change?
There are no numbers in climate. There is nothing that can 'change'.
Because there is no single measurement of climate,
There is NO measurement of climate.
therefore it can't change.
Mantra 30a. Lame.
Apparently not having a single measure of something means that it is impossible for it to change?
Mantra 30a. Lame.
I know... The word games are exhausting.
Then stop playing them.
 
His approach is playing dumb.. playing word games.

There's no single measure of health, but any person with two brain cells to rub together can recognize that there's a difference between a very healthy person and a very unhealthy person, based on individual factors.
Inversion fallacy. DON'T BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!
 
I said nothing about a meaningful measure.
Yes you did. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
I said no SINGLE measure.
There is NO measure. Climate has no values to measure. Go learn English.
That is the basis for his word games.
LIF. Grow up. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!
Of course, even if there were a single measure for health or climate, it wouldn't matter.
There is NO measure for climate.
The word game would just shift to a new form of game playing.
LIF. Grow up. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!
 
Still hammering on this shit? Wow you are incapable of thought.
Thought doesn't measure anything, Twilight. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, the pH of the oceans, the total atmospheric content of CO2 of Earth, the total precipitation on Earth, the total ice and snow on Earth, or the emissivity of Earth.
 
Back
Top