Don't have to. Instead, what I'm stating is you chant those three laws of physics, not having the first clue how any of them work and expect everyone here to simply accept your incantations from on high as if they were gospel handed down by some god. There are so many posts of yours (and ITN) like that I've lost count.
It isn't an act...Stop playing dumb.
"Neither Into the Night nor I point to people." - IBDaMann
Also IBDaMann:
(Paraphrasing) "Here are my favorite scientific laws, which are all named after or discovered by people"
You haven't had an original thought for a long time, toodles. You're all proud willful ignorance, demonstrated here by your refusal to read, much less discuss the content of the links.A bunch of irrelevant links, daylight must be impressed.
Damn this is disappointing. I thought there would be one person who could debate a scientific or engineering subject on this site
you're trying to make science into scientism so you can make it as stupid as a bad religion.Sure, right after you provide me examples of scientific laws, mathematic concepts, etc that don't involve people....that you claim not to involve.
I'm trying to expose IBDaMann's lies and nonsense.
A life time of work, that.
Yes you do.
I already addressed this. It's not chanting if that is the correct response to your error. For you to show "chanting," you have to show multiple times that my said response was not preceded by the indicated error.
You are the scientifically illiterate moron in this equation who think he's a fucking Einstein by virtue of being an electrician.
I don't expect anyone to believe anything he doesn't want to believe. I know that morons, such as yourself, post online just to rave all the mindless regurgitations that you can't say in public without finding yourself in a straightjacket.
i.e. you're trying to expose thermodynamics and Stefan-Boltzmann as lies and nonsense. Great. Let me know when you succeed.
Why don't you take a shot? All you have to do to throw it in my face is to show that energy can be increased without adding any energy and without violating the law of conservation of energy.
2+2=4. No people involved.Sure, right after you provide me examples of scientific laws, mathematic concepts, etc that don't involve people....that you claim not to involve.
Again, every law you ignorantly blather on about was discovered by a scientist. Scientists are people....you know, the things you dishonestly claim you don't reference.
What ice ages???
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing.
Climate cannot change.
Climate is not a branch of science. The Church of Global Warming is not science.
There is no theory of science about climate or magick gases that can create energy out of nothing.
We aren't born knowing math you impossibly ignorant ass clown. Do you think math floated down from the heavens like your equally idiotic partner?
Thanks for confirming your lack of scientific literacy
Thanks again for confirming your ignorance.
It doesn't matter where a theory of science comes about. What matters is the theory itself. You just want to deny and discard them.
Irrelevance fallacy.
What claim??
