Science from the other side of Climate Change

IBDaMann said:
I imagine it stings like a bitch to have your "thienth geniuth" role playing fantasy disrupted.

Frauds never take it well
Click to expand...

Hmmm, Dr. Impacted-Fecalith,
I had never considered that before. If I might, let me counter with this finding recently published in NATURE:

FG2M4Jt.jpg
 
IBDaMann said:
That was great. Post more of your "science."
Click to expand...

As you may know, the angle of the dangle is directly proportional to the heat of the meat. We summarize it in the following equation:

DeltaH = kSinQ

Where Delta H is the heat of the aforementioned meat
Q = the angle of the dangle.
k = constant of proportionality

1N87pko.jpg

Fig 1. Hot pussy spectrum action! Oooooh, look at it! Woahhhh.....WOAHHHHHHH.....
 
IBDaMann said:
We were all born with the capacity to learn math. You might be the exception to the rule.
Click to expand...
The point of that strawman is.....?

I see that you are still wasting time with this stupid "science and math are like Global Warming, i.e. results of human activity" pivot
Click to expand...
Science, even climate science, and math all originated from people, despite what you believe:

"Neither Into the Night nor I point to people."

This takes me back. I remember hurling this insult when I was ten years old. Good times.
Click to expand...
If the 10 year old shoe fits....
 
Daylight63 said:
There's no such thing as a "parrot". Made up Word Fallacy. Fallacy of Suparating Fester Pit. Mantra 50B. Lame.
Click to expand...
You've officially been classified a troll. However, you have distinguished yourself from the other trolls by being the Unhinged Troll of the Week! A prize sought by many, but rarely achieved. ZenMode has never won this prestigious award, but you show up and within weeks you nab it for your very own.

Revel in your well-earned laurels.

000125068ca062379ae44bfb4763e1c5.jpg
 
IBDaMann said:
Science isn't discovered. Science is realized and published.

You're chanting about your "human activity" again, making it perfectly clear that you have no point.


So cite one of my arguments that rests on the authority of a scientist.

Question: how long will keep looking after you realize that only you are making affirmative arguments, all of which are based on your complete scientific illiteracy?


Too funny. It's so very cute how you pretend you're omnipotent and declare what others don't know. It's your very special brand of projection that makes every one of your posts worth the price of admission.


Unlike you, I accept science. There are no people contained within any science theory.


There is no science of your WACKY religion. You are simply ignorant of science, having chosen to simply deny it at some point in your life.
Click to expand...
"Unlike you, I accept science. "

You accept Science that aligns with your politics and you apparently believe that science doesn't involve people, but floats down from heaven on gold tablets or something....even the laws literally named after scientists.

"Neither Into the Night nor I point to people. "
 
ZenMode said:
The point of that strawman is.....?
Click to expand...
Not a strawman. Did you really missed my very obvious point?

ZenMode said:
Science, even climate science,
Click to expand...
There is no science of your WACKY religion.

ZenMode said:
and math all originated from people,
Click to expand...
You haven't shown any point to be made. I recommend instead you pivot to something more informative, such as the Bolivian Shamans who promise to protect the squatters occupying land on the edge of dangerous cliff threatening to mudslide; the shamans will make an offering to Pachamama and the squatters will remain safe.

This is a far more relevant topic than your "science is human activity" pointlessness.
 
ZenMode said:
You accept Science that aligns with your politics
Click to expand...
Science is apolitical. I accept all science. I reject your religion.

ZenMode said:
you apparently believe that science doesn't involve people,
Click to expand...
You apparently believe that there are people in science laws.

How many of you fit into that little car?

ZenMode said:
even the laws literally named after scientists.
Click to expand...
Let the record reflect that you believe Ludwig Boltzmann is hiding amongst the Stefan-Boltzmann equation.

The kicker is that you are entirely serious. Too funny.
 
IBDaMann said:
Not a strawman. Did you really missed my very obvious point?


There is no science of your WACKY religion.


You haven't shown any point to be made. I recommend instead you pivot to something more informative, such as the Bolivian Shamans who promise to protect the squatters occupying land on the edge of dangerous cliff threatening to mudslide; the shamans will make an offering to Pachamama and the squatters will remain safe.

This is a far more relevant topic than your "science is human activity" pointlessness.
Click to expand...
"There is no science of your WACKY religion."

It's not religion and, yes there is, but part of your mental gymnastics, and keeping science aligning with your politics, is to pretend there isn't.

It's kind of like pretending that there are no scientists involved in your science. It's all part of your looney mental gymnastics.
 
Last edited:
IBDaMann said:
Science is apolitical. I accept all science. I reject your religion.


You apparently believe that there are people in science laws.

How many of you fit into that little car?


Let the record reflect that you believe Ludwig Boltzmann is hiding amongst the Stefan-Boltzmann equation.

The kicker is that you are entirely serious. Too funny.
Click to expand...
You don't accept all science. See my previous post about your mental gymnastics. All you are doing is proving my point over and over and over and over...
 
IBDaMann said:
This is another pivot, because apparently, that's all you have.

Let's try again. Does it matter how E = m * c^2 came into existence?
Click to expand...
Well, without people around to create the characters in the equation and figure out the equation, no, the equation would not exist.
 
ZenMode said:
It's not religion
Click to expand...
You remain unable to recognize a religion when it's right in front of you, or even after you have embraced it. You think that if you believe it, it's settled science. As a grown adult, you should be fucking embarrassed.

You've had far too long to present your science, or your rational basis for belief, but seeing as there is no science supporting your religious beliefs, and no rational basis for anyone else to believe as you do, you were left unable to present any, leaving you with no standing to claim that your WACKY religion is somehow settled science.

ZenMode said:
It's kind of like ...
Click to expand...
Nope. It's nothing like that. You worship a WACKY religion that has no science support. Your religious dogma claims to be thettled thienth, begging for the scrutiny of the scientific method. Sadly for you, your religion is totally unfalsifiable and fails that scrutiny at the starting gate.
 
IBDaMann said:
You remain unable to recognize a religion when it's right in front of you, or even after you have embraced it. You think that if you believe it, it's settled science. As a grown adult, you should be fucking embarrassed.

You've had far too long to present your science, or your rational basis for belief, but seeing as there is no science supporting your religious beliefs, and no rational basis for anyone else to believe as you do, you were left unable to present any, leaving you with no standing to claim that your WACKY religion is somehow settled science.


Nope. It's nothing like that. You worship a WACKY religion that has no science support. Your religious dogma claims to be thettled thienth, begging for the scrutiny of the scientific method. Sadly for you, your religion is totally unfalsifiable and fails that scrutiny at the starting gate.
Click to expand...
I mean, you can keep referring to it as a religion but it's not. No number of paragraphs will change that. It's all part of your ongoing mental gymnastics to keep science in line with your politics.

Your political bias does not make you the arbiter of what is and what is in science.

I will also note that I am not completely sold on climate change, but at least I educate myself and don't go to insane levels to convince myself that it's all a religion and a lie.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top