Science from the other side of Climate Change

[Into the Night]

I've never said it was settled, but I've taken the time to educate myself on the science behind it. You haven't because you, again, need to keep science inline with your politics. That's how think work in far-right Looneyville where you've apparently declared yourself the arbiter of science.

Climate is not a branch of science, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

"Crap. You just had to. We've been over this. Yes, you implied emphatically that the human origins of any given science model means everything about everything in the universe."

Uh, no. I'm just pointing out your irrational position that you don't point to people, particularly given that none of the laws or equations that you point to what exist without people.

DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PARADOX ON ANYONE ELSE!

"but to what point that brings you closer to providing your rational basis for your religious beliefs?"

Like I said previously... Over and over and over and over and over you prove my point.

Politics....

Mental gymnastics....

You are describing yourself again.

 

[Into the Night]

"You believe that violations of thermodynamics and of Stefan-Boltzmann are somehow thettled thienth."

Again I've never said anything is settled. I've said the opposite. I mean, the thread you are reading now is a counter point to climate change.

Your misapplication of scientific laws only continues to prove my point.

Climate cannot change. You cannot 'misapply' theories of science.

Attempted proof by void, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

Yep, science applies always and everywhere. That is true and it is also true that you clearly don't a) understand how climate change is believed to work and b) are misapplying scientific laws as a result.... because your political views are blinding you.

Politics is also the reason you say illogical things like claiming you "don't point to people", while referencing scientific laws that are literally named after people.

The reason you do that is because you're trying to imply that your (politically misguided view of) science is inate in the world, while climate science is made up by "evil, far-left, Marxists" pretending to be scientists.... which, in your world of politically-driven mental gymnastics, includes scientists from the 1800's.... because just that's how good those far left Marxists are!

Your fatal flaw is in the reality that both your and climate science is the result of the work of people.... scientists.

But, again, this is all the result of mental gymnastics performed to make sure your science and your beliefs about the world fit into your politics.

It is not possible to ' misapply' any theory of science.
You are just trying to deny theories of science.

Climate is not a branch of science.
Science has no politics.

 

[Into the Night]

Since you intentionally ignored the parts you don't want to address, in favor of nonsensical rhetoric, I'll say it again....

He addressed every part of your post, Void.

The reason you do that (implying that there are no people in your science) is because you're trying to imply that your (politically misguided view of) science is inate in the world, while climate science is made up by "evil, far-left, Marxists" pretending to be scientists.... which, in your world of politically-driven mental gymnastics, includes scientists from the 1800's.... because just that's how good those far left Marxists are!

Science has no politics. Science has no people. Climate is not a branch of science.

The Church of Global Warming stems from the Church of Green, which in turn stems from the Church of Karl Marx.
ALL are fundamentalist style religions. You are a fundamentalist.

 

[ZenMode]

Climate is not a branch of science, Void.
No strawman occurred. Fallacy fallacy.

"Climate is not a branch of science, Void."

Of course studying the climate is a branch of science. Stop being dumb.

 

[ZenMode]

Science has no politics, Void.

I agree. Now walk the walk.

 

[ZenMode]

Science has no politics.

Correct. And?

 

[ZenMode]

Correct.

Blatant lie. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

It's not irrational You dance. All of the characters in any equation did not just drift down from the heavens. They were created by... Wait for it... People.

 

[ZenMode]

He addressed every part of your post, Void.

Science has no politics. Science has no people. Climate is not a branch of science.

The Church of Global Warming stems from the Church of Green, which in turn stems from the Church of Karl Marx.
ALL are fundamentalist style religions. You are a fundamentalist.

"Science has no people. Climate is not a branch of science."

Yawn. Keep embarrassing yourself. Doesn't bother me!

 

[IBDaMann]

Ummm, dude you are violating copyright.

Nope. I made the graphic that I posted. I remember you posting a similar graphic but yours did not contain my signature. Also, your shrubberies did not have any symbology for "texture". Also, yours did not have a sun.

I made the graphic

You did not make the graphic I made.

 

[Into the Night]

"Climate is not a branch of science, Void."

Of course studying the climate is a branch of science. Stop being dumb.

Climate is not a study nor a branch of science. There is nothing to study. Climate does not change. There is no such thing as a global climate. Go learn English.

 

[Into the Night]

I agree. Now walk the walk.

No need. The theories speak for themselves. No politics involved. You just want to ignore them.

 

[Into the Night]

Correct. And?

Going to try to deny your own post again, eh?

 

[Daylight63]

There are also ships, bridges, airplanes, buildings, streets, counties, conference centers, etc. that are named after people and are actually not even people.

It no longer surprises me that something this basic nonetheless confuses you.

Nope. I made the graphic that I posted. I remember you posting a similar graphic but yours did not contain my signature. Also, your shrubberies did not have any symbology for "texture". Also, yours did not have a sun.


You did not make the graphic I made.

Stealing is your thing.

I love how dishonest you are. It’s refreshing when someone says they are a thief.

Thief

 

[Daylight63]

No need. The theories speak for themselves. No politics involved. You just want to ignore them.

Dumper Humper Fallacy.

 

[Daylight63]

He addressed every part of your post, Void.

Science has no politics. Science has no people. Climate is not a branch of science.

The Church of Global Warming stems from the Church of Green, which in turn stems from the Church of Karl Marx.
ALL are fundamentalist style religions. You are a fundamentalist.

Politics has no science! Karl Marx wasn’t a church.

Fallacy of the Depleted Penis Pump. Mantra 5b. Lame

 

[IBDaMann]

Stealing is your thing.

Nope, but lying and attention-whoring is obviously your thing.

I love how dishonest you are.

You are the dishonest one here.

It’s refreshing when someone says they are a thief.

Even lying in English requires parallel structure. The word "someone" is a singular whereas "they" is a plural. Use "he" instead of "they" in such situations. In your next life, I recommend you pay attention in school.

 

[IBDaMann]

Karl Marx wasn’t a church.

When you read English, you need to read all of the words, to include the prepositions, e.g. "of"

Into the Night wrote "the church of Karl Marx" not "the chuch Karl Marx." All of the words are important.

 

[Daylight63]

When you read English, you need to read all of the words, to include the prepositions, e.g. "of"

Into the Night wrote "the church of Karl Marx" not "the chuch Karl Marx." All of the words are important.

Thief