Science from the other side of Climate Change

then why do you want to worship scientists instead of to spread rationality? (clumsy parallel construction)
Let's reword that post with less rhetoric and bias:

"Why do you trust scientists, who are more experienced and educated on the topic than I am, instead of reading stuff and believing I can figure it out on my own?"
 
9. All posts, once submitted, are public and are readable by the public; posting your own original content on the site allows, in perpetuity, the owners of justplainpolitics.com full rights to the work.

You are not the owner of the site.

And it CERTAINLY doesn't give you the right to ALTER the work without permission.
 
permission from the owner, Damocles?

You are not the owner. Sorry you are mistaken. You are simply a thief who has misappropriated that which you do not have the right to and made alterations and further presented it as your own work.

If you don't like moral actions and you hate being a good person, definitely continue as you normally do.

I am fascinated that someone like you can utterly lack morality.

Guess you'll be OK if I come and steal from you, too, eh?
 
You are not the owner. Sorry you are mistaken. You are simply a thief who has misappropriated that which you do not have the right to and made alterations and further presented it as your own work.

If you don't like moral actions and you hate being a good person, definitely continue as you normally do.

I am fascinated that someone like you can utterly lack morality.

Guess you'll be OK if I come and steal from you, too, eh?
damocles is the owner, as you conceded upon joining the forum.

R.I.F.

Reading is Fundamental.

Don[t do drug.s
 
you know, I'm always trusting you deep state people that slowing down the agenda is preferable to blowing up society.

all things are achievable throught time.

but you can;t kill the muggles.
 
then why do you want to worship scientists instead of to spread rationality? (clumsy parallel construction)

ZenMode said:
Let's reword that post with less rhetoric and bias:

"Why do you trust scientists, who are more experienced and educated on the topic than I am, instead of reading stuff and believing I can figure it out on my own?"

Thoughts?
 
You and your political bias don't decide what is/isn't science.
So you boldly state that the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, Kirchoff's law, and the Stefan-Boltzmann law; are not theories of science! Too hilarious! You're not even being subtle about it anymore!
You can't even figure out that scientific laws come from scientists.
They do, but the theories themselves do not require any scientists to exist. Theories support themselves. No people required.
What the fuck would anyone listen to you?
Bulverism fallacy.
Which part of the globe doesn't have climate?
A part of the Earth isn't the whole Earth, moron.

You still try to say some magick gas can create energy out of nothing, increasing the temperature of the Earth, and ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.

You still try to say some magick gas can heat a warmer surface using the colder gas, and ignoring the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

You still try to say you can trap heat. Heat has no location.

You still try to say that warmer objects do not radiate more light, ignoring the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

You still try to separate the atmosphere from Earth, ignoring Kirchoff's law.

You still try to say you can trap light, ignoring the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

You still think climate can change, ignoring English.

You still think you can calculate the temperature of Earth, ignoring statistical mathematics.

You still try to deny your own posts!

Now you suggest that part of the Earth is the whole Earth???????
 
Studying and predicting climate is science.
There is nothing to study. Climate cannot change.
You cannot predict climate, since climate has no unit of time.
QED. Someone blinded by the politics is sure to agree with someone blinded by the same politics.
Science has no politics.
Unfortunately, your politics doesn't change reality.
Science has no politics. You don't even know what 'reality' means or how it's defined.
Which part of the globe doesn't have climate, again?
Part of the Earth is not the whole Earth, moron.
 
Back
Top