Science from the other side of Climate Change

[Into the Night]

You're not sorry, you're pathetic.

LIF. Grow up.

 

[Into the Night]

Let's reword that post with less rhetoric and bias:

"Why do you trust scientists, who are more experienced and educated on the topic than I am, instead of reading stuff and believing I can figure it out on my own?"

Climate is not a branch of science.

 

[Into the Night]

You are not the owner of the site.

And it CERTAINLY doesn't give you the right to ALTER the work without permission.

Heh. A work that YOU stole from another site! Thief.

 

[gfm7175]

He doesn't care about children. Like any Democrat, he HATES them.

Bingo. That's why he wants children to remain gathered inside of a small area that is loudly advertised as being "gun free". That's why he wants to confuse them about their gender, going so far as to irreversibly mutilate their genitalia. Heck, that's why he wants to kill them before they are even born.

You're right. He HATES children.

 

[Into the Night]

"You can't bring poor ole' Arrhenius into this. His theory that a gas can heat the Earth by it's mere presence was falsified by the laws of thermodynamics."

That's your opinion

Nope. I didn't write the laws of thermodynamics.

because you've provided nothing to show that CO2's impact on temperatures violates any laws.

Blatant lie. I have already posted the equations to these theories several times. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

So, where's your link?

No link necessary to post a theory of science or it's equation.

I'm sure you don't actually expect any reasonable person to take your word for it, do you?

No my word for it. The theories stand on their own and speak for themselves. They are their own evidence, along with tests designed to destroyed it (and failed).

Scientists are very good at reviewing and pointing out errors made by other scientists. Which scientists have pointed out this flaw as it relates to CO2 in the environment?

What 'flaw'? No Magick Holy Gas has the capability to warm the Earth. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.

Your word games won't work here.

 

[Daylight63]

Heh. A work that YOU stole from another site! Thief.

Nope. lol.

 

[ZenMode]

Climate is not a branch of science.

Again.... that's opinion. A dumb opinion.

 

[ZenMode]

Nope. I didn't write the laws of thermodynamics.

Blatant lie. I have already posted the equations to these theories several times. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

No link necessary to post a theory of science or it's equation.

No my word for it. The theories stand on their own and speak for themselves. They are their own evidence, along with tests designed to destroyed it (and failed).

What 'flaw'? No Magick Holy Gas has the capability to warm the Earth. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.

Your word games won't work here.

Derp derp derp....

 

[IBDaMann]

scientific laws don't magically become figurative

Figuratively is exactly how science laws speak. Your presumption that science laws literally speak is stupid.

You post a lot of stupid shit.

 

[IBDaMann]

You don't know because you've chosen to remain ignorant.

In a sense. I don't know what WACKY physics violation you are concocting at the moment, but that's only because you have not yet posted it to JPP. I'm sure it's another sci-fi masterpiece like your other works.

Thanks again for proving my point that you have not only view science through politics,

I don't "view" science.

 

[ZenMode]

Figuratively is exactly how science laws speak. Your presumption that science laws literally speak is stupid.

You post a lot of stupid shit.

To clarify, a molecule of water isn't literally two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen, it's only figuratively two atoms of hydrogen and one of oxygen. Do I have that right?

 

[ZenMode]

In a sense. I don't know what WACKY physics violation you are concocting at the moment, but that's only because you have not yet posted it to JPP. I'm sure it's another sci-fi masterpiece like your other works.


I don't "view" science.

Wait.. are you saying you don't literally view science or you don't figuratively view science?

 

[IBDaMann]

No, it does not matter how it came into existence. I never said it did.

Yes, you have been implying nonstop that the human activity that brings science into existence proves that Climate Change is real and that I have been wrong this whole time.

You are logically inept. You still have not posted any rational basis for belief in your WACKY religion.

I'm saying that it could not come into existence without the people you allegedly don't point to.

Let's get back to your claim that I somehow point to people as to what science is, as opposed to only pointing to science as to what science is. You are still on tap to give an example.

It's time to belly up to the bar. Cough up an example.

 

[IBDaMann]

To clarify, a molecule of water isn't literally two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen, it's only figuratively two atoms of hydrogen and one of oxygen. Do I have that right?

You do not have that right.

You need to provide an example of a science model literally speaking ... or else admit to having misspoken yourself.

 

[IBDaMann]

You're not sorry, you're pathetic.

The death of your religion stings like a bitch, doesn't it.

Anyway, the good news is that you can now resume being a Christian.

 

[IBDaMann]

I'm pointing out your foolish beliefs.

What are those, specifically?

RQAA.

You have never specified any foolish belief that I hold. You have only divulged the foolish beliefs that you hold.

Would you care to try again? What foolish beliefs do I hold that you wish to point out?

 

[IBDaMann]

You are an appalling person.

What do you do fo a living? Obviously not art.

 

[IBDaMann]

Rather the opposite, isn't it? After all, to be blinded so thoroughly that one does not know they are blinded by definition shows he does NOT realize he is blinded.

Good point. I'd have to put myself in his shoes to fully realize what he's going through ... and I'd rather not.

 

[Litmus]

Yes. They're human. There are dishonest doctors and mechanics. Do you stop going to doctors and do your own surgeries/prescriptions because there are some dishonest doctors or do you, overall, still trust doctors to know more than you do?

more often they're guaranteed to be lying because the whole profession is corrupt.
it's not about knowledge.

some entire professions are corrupt.

 

[IBDaMann]

Science has no politics.

Correct. And?

scientism does.

ZenMode is driven completely by the politics of his religion, which claims to be settled science. Keep in mind that the idea of his WACKY religion being settled science is always assumed (never spoken) so that any Climate presbyter can always say "I never said that."