ZenMode
Well-known member
You and your political bias don't decide what is/isn't science.
You can't even figure out that scientific laws come from scientists. What the fuck would anyone listen to you?
Which part of the globe doesn't have climate?
Science from the other side of Climate Change
- Thread starter ZenMode
- Start date
ZenMode
Well-known member
Theories can't speak. Void.
I'm not ignoring anything. I'm pointing out your foolish beliefs.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Which post(s) am I denying?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You're just envious of my work.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Sure they do, figuratively.
You are ignoring all the critical elements.
What are those, specifically?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Science is a collection of falsifiable models that predict nature. Climate is not a falsifiable model that predicts nature. Climate is not science.
QED.
He happens to know what he's talking about, unlike you.
We're the one's who don't understand how your religious dogma is believed to work, remember? You tell us.
Daylight63
Verified User
You are an appalling person.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Studying and predicting climate is science.
QED.
Someone blinded by the politics is sure to agree with someone blinded by the same politics. Unfortunately, your politics doesn't change reality.
Which part of the globe doesn't have climate, again?
ZenMode
Well-known member
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Your envy is so transparent. My pic makes your finger-painting piece look juvenile. So, you aren't a scientist and you aren't an artist. What else can you not do?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Figuratively is exactly what is being said, although neither you nor I expect you to be able to discern any of this.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Nope. Chanting the prayers of a religion is never science. You have no falsifiable model that predicts nature.
You have more experience in being blinded by politics that I do, so I'll stipulate that you can realize that you are blinded by politics.
Daylight63
Verified User
Envy isn't transparent, Sybil. No picture is made by finger-painting.
Fallacy of the Festering Cock Hole. Mantra 44b. Lame.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Again, your politicized view of science, tainted with ridiculous conspiracy theories, doesn't create reality. Scientists have been studying the impacts of CO2 in the atmosphere, since the 1800's. You labeling it as a religion doesn't change anything and only confirms what I've been saying.
lol... Blinded meaning I lean toward climate change likely being true, but am not 100% sold on the urgent need to address it or that we fully understand the incredible complexity of the Earth....as the subject of this very thread shows.
Yah... I'M the blind one. Lol...you haven't even figured out that the scientific laws, you incorrectly reference, came from people!
ZenMode
Well-known member
I know you're saying the word figurative, but scientific laws don't magically become figurative because you (incorrectly) label them as such.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
In what ways is my recognition that humans conspire relevant? How does it somehow validate your religion?
I appreciate your labeling of your chanting with the word "again."
What would my view of science have to do with your attempts to violate it?
What impacts have been studied and detailed? This pivot of yours away from Earth's average global equilibrium temperature to undefined "impacts" of the atmosphere is an obvious attempt to buy time while you derail the discussion.
Dial it back. What is your rational basis for your beliefs in your WACKY religion? At present, you are unable to express any such reasoning as to why any rational adult should suspend disbelief in your religious fantasy and worship as you do
You obviously misunderstood. I applied no labels. The correct word for religion actually is "religion."
Nothing confirms your attempted physics violations.
... just as Christians lean toward Christianity being true.
What? You aren't 100% sure of the need to pray to Climate or to obligate taxation sacrifices and offerings? Keep us posted and let us know when you are sure.
What has the complexity of the earth to do with the extreme simplicity of it's average global equilibrium temperature?
I'm glad we got that straight.
Thank you for reminding me. How, exactly, is that relevant? In what way does it matter how a science model come into existence?
ZenMode
Well-known member
"What impacts have been studied and detailed?"
Right. You don't know because you've chosen to remain ignorant. Thanks again for proving my point that you have not only view science through politics, but you also haven't educated yourself on the topic... due to politics.
Litmus
Verified User
then why do you want to worship scientists instead of to spread rationality? (clumsy parallel construction)
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Your decision to "snub" thermodynamics and Stefan-Boltzmann (irrationally HATE and deny), just because they kill your religious faith, is rather pathetic.
I feel sorry for you.
Litmus
Verified User
scientism does.