Science from the other side of Climate Change

[T. A. Gardner]

... showing clearly that your beliefs are WACKY.

And, the other Hogwarts graduate chimes in...

 

[IBDaMann]

That's just a cherry-picking fallacy.

Cherry-picking is not a fallacy. Cherry-picking is the basis of the scientific method; it's how experiments are developed. Stick with solar panel installation.

I listed multiple sources including those from MIT itself.

Consider your propaganda-for-the-gullible rejected by those who are not gullible. Stick with electrical outlet installation.

unless you can prove the content is a lie or fallacious

False. You really suck at this. It's your fucking religion; you bear the full burden to support your affirmative assertions. Nobody is required to falsify your religion.

MIT et al., says you can trap light

You should have called booooolsch't on whoever is pretending to speak for "MIT" and you should have called boooooolsch't on the claim that light can be trapped ... but then again, you don't know enough to do so. You rely on others to do your thinking for you. You'd think that, that being the case, you'd pick people who are trying to help you in whom to place your confidence instead of placing your unquestioning OBEDIENCE in people who simply want to bend you over furniture and ream you up the ass.

You really are stupid that way.

 

[IBDaMann]

That's not trapping light. You cannot trap light.

I had no idea that T.A. Gardner was this scientifically illiterate and this gullible. The method in question channels/directs light in a similar fashion to fiber optic cabling. You could channel/direct light using mirrors if you wish; you'd just experience much greater, even unacceptable, loss for such applications.

If you pull the bolt to drain your oil pan into a gutter illegally, where it is channeled into a storm drain to be directed out to the ocean, the draining oil must clearly be trapped, right? When you shine a laser on a stop sign, that light is trapped, right? When you flip a switch to allow electrical current to flow over a circuit, those electrons are trapped, right?

 

[IBDaMann]

The Earth in terms of energy is not a closed nor an isolated system.

Too funny. You have no idea what you are talking about. You think you are somehow implying a point that you don't understand well enough to express. I hope you are ready for a splash of cold water. This isn't going to go well for you.

Question: Do you mistakenly believe that the 1st LoT requires a closed system? [Hint: yes, you do]
Question: Do you understand what an equilibrium is? [Hint: no, you do not]

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Cherry-picking is not a fallacy. Cherry-picking is the basis of the scientific method; it's how experiments are developed. Stick with solar panel installation.

Cherry Picking: When People Ignore Evidence that They Dislike – Effectiviology

effectiviology.com

7 Cherry Picking Fallacy Examples for When People Ignore Evidence

These cherry picking fallacy examples will illustrate how this method of unsound reasoning can persuade people into believing false arguments.

www.developgoodhabits.com

Cherry Picking Fallacy: Skewing Reality in Decision Making | logiccheck.ai

A cunning bias that selectively highlights only the evidence that supports a particular position, while ignoring or downplaying the rest. Delve into this fascinating fallacy and learn how to detect when you're being fed only half the truth in a debate.

logiccheck.ai

Consider your propaganda-for-the-gullible rejected by those who are not gullible. Stick with electrical outlet installation.

Ad hominem

False. You really suck at this. It's your fucking religion; you bear the full burden to support your affirmative assertions. Nobody is required to falsify your religion.

Insults followed by a proof I gave above.

You should have called booooolsch't on whoever is pretending to speak for "MIT" and you should have called boooooolsch't on the claim that light can be trapped ... but then again, you don't know enough to do so. You rely on others to do your thinking for you. You'd think that, that being the case, you'd pick people who are trying to help you in whom to place your confidence instead of placing your unquestioning OBEDIENCE in people who simply want to bend you over furniture and ream you up the ass.

You really are stupid that way.

More insults and ad hominem

 

[ZenMode]

I had no idea that T.A. Gardner was this scientifically illiterate and this gullible. The method in question channels/directs light in a similar fashion to fiber optic cabling. You could channel/direct light using mirrors if you wish; you'd just experience much greater, even unacceptable, loss for such applications.

If you pull the bolt to drain your oil pan into a gutter illegally, where it is channeled into a storm drain to be directed out to the ocean, the draining oil must clearly be trapped, right? When you shine a laser on a stop sign, that light is trapped, right? When you flip a switch to allow electrical current to flow over a circuit, those electrons are trapped, right?

"I had no idea that T.A. Gardner was this scientifically illiterate and this gullible. "

 

[ZenMode]

I had no idea that T.A. Gardner was this scientifically illiterate and this gullible. The method in question channels/directs light in a similar fashion to fiber optic cabling. You could channel/direct light using mirrors if you wish; you'd just experience much greater, even unacceptable, loss for such applications.

If you pull the bolt to drain your oil pan into a gutter illegally, where it is channeled into a storm drain to be directed out to the ocean, the draining oil must clearly be trapped, right?

RQAA

When you shine a laser on a stop sign, that light is trapped, right?

RQAA

When you flip a switch to allow electrical current to flow over a circuit, those electrons are trapped, right?

RQAA

 

[IBDaMann]

Insults followed by a proof I gave above.

What you are describing as a "cherry-picking fallacy" is simply not adhering to the scientific method. Denying data that falsifies your hypothesis is a fallacy, but that is not what Into the Night did; it is what you did.

More insults and ad hominem

Not insults. Observations. They are what they are.

By the way, I notice that you like to post erroneous crap that you find on the internet that happens to agree with your mistakes, under the belief that everything you read on the internet must be true. This observable gullibility of yours is not an insult; it is an observation.

 

[ZenMode]

What you are describing as a "cherry-picking fallacy" is simply not adhering to the scientific method. Denying data that falsifies your hypothesis is a fallacy, but that is not what Into the Night did; it is what you did.


Not insults. Observations. They are what they are.

By the way, I notice that you like to post erroneous crap that you find on the internet that happens to agree with your mistakes, under the belief that everything you read on the internet must be true. This observable gullibility of yours is not an insult; it is an observation.

"By the way, I notice that you like to post erroneous crap that you find on the internet "

How does that compare to you posting erroneous crap that you manufacturer in your mind that has no connection with reality?

 

[AProudLefty]

No, a MAGAZINE says they are. They aren't. It is not possible to trap light.

What do you mean when you say trap light or heat?

 

[Into the Night]

I'm beginning to believe that ITN doesn't believe the atmosphere exists...

It exists. It just doesn't have the magick properties you think it has.

 

[Into the Night]

He has his own "special" kind of science, the one where whatever he thinks becomes scientific reality.

I did not write any of the laws of thermodynamics you discard. I didn't write the Stefan-Boltzmann law or Kirchoff's law that you discard either.
You don't even know the meaning of 'reality'. Buzzword fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Cherry-picking is not a fallacy. Cherry-picking is the basis of the scientific method; it's how experiments are developed. Stick with solar panel installation.

Cherry picking can be a fallacy, but he just grabbed the phrase out of thick air. You are correct, of course.

Consider your propaganda-for-the-gullible rejected by those who are not gullible. Stick with electrical outlet installation.

Frankly, I'm surprised he's so gullible.

 

[Into the Night]

I had no idea that T.A. Gardner was this scientifically illiterate and this gullible. The method in question channels/directs light in a similar fashion to fiber optic cabling. You could channel/direct light using mirrors if you wish; you'd just experience much greater, even unacceptable, loss for such applications.

If you pull the bolt to drain your oil pan into a gutter illegally, where it is channeled into a storm drain to be directed out to the ocean, the draining oil must clearly be trapped, right? When you shine a laser on a stop sign, that light is trapped, right? When you flip a switch to allow electrical current to flow over a circuit, those electrons are trapped, right?

You don't need to know how light works to be an electrician. I am surprised at his gullibility as well.

 

[Into the Night]

Too funny. You have no idea what you are talking about. You think you are somehow implying a point that you don't understand well enough to express. I hope you are ready for a splash of cold water. This isn't going to go well for you.

Question: Do you mistakenly believe that the 1st LoT requires a closed system? [Hint: yes, you do]
Question: Do you understand what an equilibrium is? [Hint: no, you do not]

He doesn't even know what a 'system' is or how it's defined. He doesn't understand that a system is literally what you choose it to be, and it is always a closed system because you chose it and it's boundaries.

 

[Into the Night]

Cherry Picking: When People Ignore Evidence that They Dislike – Effectiviology

effectiviology.com

7 Cherry Picking Fallacy Examples for When People Ignore Evidence

These cherry picking fallacy examples will illustrate how this method of unsound reasoning can persuade people into believing false arguments.

www.developgoodhabits.com

Cherry Picking Fallacy: Skewing Reality in Decision Making | logiccheck.ai

A cunning bias that selectively highlights only the evidence that supports a particular position, while ignoring or downplaying the rest. Delve into this fascinating fallacy and learn how to detect when you're being fed only half the truth in a debate.

logiccheck.ai

Ad hominem


Insults followed by a proof I gave above.


More insults and ad hominem

Fallacy fallacy. Inversion fallacy. Attempted proof by false equivalence. Stick to your wiring. You suck at logic.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Fallacy fallacy. Inversion fallacy. Attempted proof by false equivalence. Stick to your wiring. You suck at logic.

 

[Into the Night]

"I had no idea that T.A. Gardner was this scientifically illiterate and this gullible. "

You can't laugh your way out of you illiteracy, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

Assumption of victory fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

RQAARQAA

RQAA

Random phrase. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. Mockery gets you nowhere.