Again with the invective. It seems beyond your capability to limit it. Anyway, to understand how alleged viruses could be truly isolated, I gave an in depth explanation in
post #846.
1. a unique particle with the characteristics of a virus is purified from the tissues or fluids of a sick living being. The purification method to be used is at the discretion of the virologists but electron micrographs must be provided to confirm the successful purification of morphologically-identical alleged viral particles;
2. the purified particle is biochemically characterized for its protein components and genetic sequence;
3. the proteins are proven to be coded for by these same genetic sequences;
4. the purified viral particles alone, through a natural exposure route, are shown to cause identical sickness in test subjects, by using valid controls;
5. particles must then be successfully re-isolated (through purification) from the test subject at 4 above, and demonstrated to have exactly the same characteristics as the particles found in step
1. Has been done multiple times. You just refuse to accept the evidence.
2. Has been done multiple times. You just refuse to accept the evidence.
3. Has been done multiple times. You just refuse to accept the evidence.
4. Has been done multiple times. You just refuse to accept the evidence.
5. has been done multiple times. You just refuse to accept the evidence.