Ghandi said something about people who rape, abuse and torture children? What was it he said?
Sex offenders have kerfew
- Thread starter Robdawg
- Start date
Ghandi said something about people who rape, abuse and torture children? What was it he said?
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
http://www.csun.edu/~psy453/crimes_y.htm
Sex offenders, such as rapists, pedophiles, and exhibitionists, are among the highest reoccurring offense populations in the United States probation system. These offenders commit crimes that put fear into the general public and pose a threat to people that live in their neighborhoods. These offenders should be punished and not let off or forgiven of their crime(s) just because they have gone through a treatment program, most or which cannot show a significant success rate.
Chemical castration is an ideal punishment for sex offenders. When Depo-Provera is administerd, recidivism rates fall to 5%. Their sexual fantasies are lessened as a result of the reduction of testosterone levels. Although men administered this drug are capable of having sexual intercourse, many people argue that chemical castration is cruel and unusual punishment. This argument is countered by the fact that sex offenders are required to get injections only once a month. What is "cruel and unusual" is allowing sex offenders to attack innocent women and children. This effective therapy will protect future victims. It is an "offender friendly" way of reducing sexual violence. [LaLaunie Hayes.]
Sex offenders, such as rapists, pedophiles, and exhibitionists, are among the highest reoccurring offense populations in the United States probation system. These offenders commit crimes that put fear into the general public and pose a threat to people that live in their neighborhoods. These offenders should be punished and not let off or forgiven of their crime(s) just because they have gone through a treatment program, most or which cannot show a significant success rate.
Chemical castration is an ideal punishment for sex offenders. When Depo-Provera is administerd, recidivism rates fall to 5%. Their sexual fantasies are lessened as a result of the reduction of testosterone levels. Although men administered this drug are capable of having sexual intercourse, many people argue that chemical castration is cruel and unusual punishment. This argument is countered by the fact that sex offenders are required to get injections only once a month. What is "cruel and unusual" is allowing sex offenders to attack innocent women and children. This effective therapy will protect future victims. It is an "offender friendly" way of reducing sexual violence. [LaLaunie Hayes.]
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Damo, this is just like in the national healthcare thread. You know I'm going to own you. I don't even see why you try. 
5% is still too high, Watermark. We have a duty as a society to protect the most innocent. ANY recidivism is unacceptible and any chance of it an unacceptible risk, especially as people begin to believe that they are "safe" now. There is no way children should be victimized by a person who has been convicted of this crime, ever. Especially when the "punishment" allows them to be committing the crime repetitively.
Because you are an emotive fool who wants desperately to protect those who victimize children, over protecting the children. To allow their "punishment" to actually allow "recidivism".Damo, this is just like in the national healthcare thread. You know I'm going to own you. I don't even see why you try.
Releasing people who do this on society is irresponsible if there is any chance at all of recidivism. Such action only ensures more victimization of our children, that is totally 100% unacceptable.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Then lock up repeat offender for life. One strikes laws can never get on the ballot anyone they're pushed because it's simply too harsh and people balk at the concept. A two-strikes law would be more likely to be instituted, and if we chemically castrate them first, then we have 95% reformed, which is not a small amount by any measure.
Water that 5% figure is complete bullshit. First of all, the sadistic predator of children is not motivated by sex drive. (there are different kinds of child predators). Secondly, since somthing like 90% of sex crimes go unreported to claim that this study could tell who reoffended and who didn't is a crock. And thirdly, who were the test subjects? Level 1, 2 or 3 offenders?
No, lock them all up for life. Seriously, some of them simply get better at hiding it. The only way to ensure that they will never repeat the activity is to make sure they never speak to a child again.
It is unacceptable to release a group you know victimize children and say that there is some "acceptable" rate of recidivism. There simply is not any acceptable rate of recidivism on this group of victims. None.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Yes, and if we locked everyone up for life for every crime committed, we'd get no recividism either. To lock up 95% of the people for life, who are never going to commit a crime again, why, people just don't go for that.
your 95% figure is complete bullshit. no matter how many times you use it.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
I'm pretty certian they didn't chemically castrate people for pissing in public. It was probably level 1.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
If this is going to turn into another "beat up Watermark" thread, then I'm just gonna leave. Bye.
Some crimes do have an acceptable rate of recidivism, this one does not.
There is no way that you will be able to convince me that it is responsible to release a group whose recidivism is difficult to detect (they are very hard to catch as their victims rarely report) and whom we know have already victimized the most innocent, a child, in a way that will effect their entire life. Any chance at recidivism is unacceptable.
Once we know they have the proclivity to attempt to 'control' children in such a way it is simply done. They should never be allowed any access to children again. It is not "cruel and unusual" to protect children.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
It's simply too harsh, Damo. The public will never accept that.
I doubt that most of the public would have any objection. So far, only one person I have "spoken" with does, that is you.
And only one official "group" that I know of, that is NAMBLA.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
I've read about one-strike-and-you're-out. It couldn't even get enough signatures to get on the ballot in Washington.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
AND FUCK YOU DAMO. I'M BLOCKING YOU UNTIL YOU APOLOGIZE YOU FUCKING IMMORAL BASTARD.
LOL. You can't.
And what have I done? You are the only person I have "spoken" to that has objected to my suggestion. That does not suggest that you are the only one out there. I think more of the public, with this particular crime, would agree with me than with you.
Oh.... I see. It was the NAMBLA thing. I didn't realize it could be taken quite that way.
I never meant in any way to suggest that you were a part of NAMBLA. I don't think you are, I think you just have misplaced compassion for the wrong group here.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
I can't believe you're actually saying I'm soft on them for supporting MANDATORY CASTRATION! For Christ sake, isn't that an order of magnitude harsher than what's done in 99% of states?