Shoud this gay molester escape jail?

Shoud this gay molester escape jail?

  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .
kiki said:
Must you continually sweet talk me?
Show me the proof where I made an outrageous claim. I'm waiting!
Click to expand...

Now you are trying to be the typical dishonest lefttard pretending that you did not infer it in this exchange:

Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911
Untrue.
It's a crime for someone to take advantage of an underage child, for sexual gratification.


Quote Originally Posted by kiki
Except for Phil Robertson, right?


Quote Originally Posted by kiki
Can you prove he didn't, counselor?

You're not on;y stupid, but dishonest as well; a common trait of Liberal lefties.

Dismissed; I am not going to engage in the never ending circle of stupidity with someone so painfully stupid and dishonest.
 
Truth Detector said:
Now you are trying to be the typical dishonest lefttard pretending that you did not infer it in this exchange:

Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911
Untrue.
It's a crime for someone to take advantage of an underage child, for sexual gratification.


Quote Originally Posted by kiki
Except for Phil Robertson, right?


Quote Originally Posted by kiki
Can you prove he didn't, counselor?

You're not on;y stupid, but dishonest as well; a common trait of Liberal lefties.

Dismissed; I am not going to engage in the never ending circle of stupidity with someone so painfully stupid and dishonest.
Click to expand...

I asked a question, which you cannot answer other than to quack like a duck.
I'll bet you look real pretty in your Duck Dynasty outfit.
 
kiki said:
Now here is where we separate the skilled from the unskilled. Provide my written statement where I claimed Phil Robertson is a child molester.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm; let's see.
In a thread regarding a molester; you decide to include your statement of:
kiki said:
Except for Phil Robertson, right?
Click to expand...
and you want others to believe that it was just casual conversation. :palm;
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Hmmmm; let's see.
In a thread regarding a molester; you decide to include your statement of:

and you want others to believe that it was just casual conversation. :palm;
Click to expand...

Did I ask a question? What I want you to believe is that you are chasing a dream.
 
kiki said:
Cite the rule which you think I broke.
Click to expand...

well, the one that obviously comes to mind is
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...
 
Jarod said:
Agreeable and consenting are two different things. The word agreeable was carefully chosen. Can you understand the difference?
Click to expand...

When it comes to CHILDREN, they can neither agree of consent; so trying to make this a difference carries no weight.
 
kiki said:
Specifically, how did I break the rule?
And more importantly, why aren't you reporting me?
Click to expand...

the average person wouldn't need it explained in any greater detail than the rule itself......and I have chosen to point it out to you instead of reporting it because apparently you aren't as bright as the average person......just sayin'......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top