Should people get a hearing before being deported? Due Process.

That does not give him the right to deport people without due process.
Yes it does, Pretender.
Even the Supreme Court agreed yesterday.
Stop making shit up, Pretender.
If you allow the president, the right to deport people who he says are illegal, solely on his word, we are not a free country.
We are a free country BECAUSE the President has exactly this authority.
Anyone can be called illegal by a single person.
That's right, Pretender. A single judge, magistrate, or just stopping them at the border and deporting them.
Tax dollars are being used to incarcerated people who have been convicted of the crime.
And well spent, Pretender.
 
Of course they should, the text as written does not specify 'only american citizens' (Which itself wouldn't work as you can't prove they're not a citizen unless due process has been involved), but rather ANY PERSON.

"nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

This isn't in question to anyone with a working brain. Sadly MAGA is not known for having working brains, or caring about the Constitution and Bill of Rights when it comes to anyone other than their whore selves.


I'm all for deporting piece of shit criminal gangbangers. But due process is required for each and every one to prove they are that, and that they should be deported.
No life, liberty, or property has been deprived by the United States, moron. He was deported.

Don't try to hide behind the Constitution you despise.
 
nope. He wants to tell others to shoot and torture people. He does not have to do it himself.
The point of his shooting remark was that no matter what he does, his followers will stay. You guys are proving that . In 100 days of breaking rules, torturing people, firing people for fun, wrecking our economy and threatening the world economy out of his stubborn stupidity, and there you are standing in line with other Trumpys.
Everything will not be fine, unless he changes. That is not likely.
I must really such to be so paranoid, Sybil.
 
You flatter Biden. He was no con man, or genius at anything. He was just a lifelong public servant who tried to do his best for Americans.
Treason is not what is best for the United States.

Biden committed treason by providing the enemy with weapons and supplies in time of war.
Biden committed treason by calling for civil war against citizens of the United States.
Biden committed treason by inviting invasion of the United States.
Biden committed treason by espionage.
 
Why was he booted from office…by his own party?
Because it became blaringly obvious that Biden could not beat Trump, or even keep track of what was happening around him.
His intentionally open borders harmed many Americans. Ask the mother of Laken Riley and many others.
That it did, but that is not the reason the Democrats 'put him out to pasture'.
His misuse of his position in government to profit himself and his family (bribery) was cause for impeachment but the Democrats in the Senate would never have voted to convict the grifter.
Treason, however, is still a crime. It has no expiration date. Biden is still liable for the acts of treason he committed, and because Obama was pulling the strings on this Puppet, is just as liable.
 
It is so much worse. Before taking office, Trump set up a prison system in El Salvador to bypass our justice system.
It doesn't bypass anything, Sybil.
That is wrong in so many ways. Trumpys do not care about his ignoring judicial and Constitutional systems and laws.
He isn't. DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE, SYBIL!
That shows how much they care about America. Not much. They want the dictator to be in charge.
You are describing yourself again, Sybil. YOU CANNOT BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ANYBODY ELSE!
 
From a Reagan appointed judge

‘Shocking to the sense of liberty Americans hold dear’: the impassioned US court order in the Ábrego García case

Judges on the US court of appeals for the fourth circuit issued a memorable call for the return of Kilmar Ábrego García and the separation of government powers. Here is the text

Upon review of the government’s motion, the court denies the motion for an emergency stay pending appeal and for a writ of mandamus. The relief the government is requesting is both extraordinary and premature. While we fully respect the Executive’s robust assertion of its Article II powers, we shall not micromanage the efforts of a fine district judge attempting to implement the Supreme Court’s recent decision.
NO court has any authority over the President's authority of the executive branch.
It is difficult in some cases to get to the very heart of the matter. But in this case, it is not hard at all. The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order. Further, it claims in essence that because it has rid itself of custody that there is nothing that can be done.
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!

NOTHING in the Constitution magickally gives any illegal alien the right to remain in the United States. No hearing or court order is required at all to deport someone.
This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear.
NO judge or court has ANY authority over the President's authority of the executive branch of government, including enforcing the borders.

The government asserts that Abrego Garcia is a terrorist and a member of MS-13.
Correct, as determined by TWO courts.
Perhaps, but perhaps not. Regardless, he is still entitled to due process.
He got it.
If the government is confident of its position, it should be assured that position will prevail in proceedings to terminate the withholding of removal order. Moreover, the government has conceded that Abrego Garcia was wrongly or “mistakenly” deported. Why then should it not make what was wrong, right?
No 'removal order' required.
The Supreme Court’s decision remains, as always, our guidepost.
The Supreme Court has NO authority to change the Constitution, and NO authority over the President's authority of the executive branch.
That decision rightly requires the lower federal courts to give “due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs”.
They have NO authority here. Neither does SCOTUS.
That would allow sensitive diplomatic negotiations to be removed from public view.
No negotiations. They will be deported.
It would recognize as well that the “facilitation” of Abrego Garcia’s return leaves the Executive Branch with options in the execution to which the courts in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision should extend a genuine deference. That decision struck a balance that does not permit lower courts to leave Article II by the wayside.
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!
More mindless cut and paste.
 
NO court has any authority over the President's authority of the executive branch.

DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!

NOTHING in the Constitution magickally gives any illegal alien the right to remain in the United States. No hearing or court order is required at all to deport someone.

NO judge or court has ANY authority over the President's authority of the executive branch of government, including enforcing the borders.


Correct, as determined by TWO courts.

He got it.

No 'removal order' required.

The Supreme Court has NO authority to change the Constitution, and NO authority over the President's authority of the executive branch.

They have NO authority here. Neither does SCOTUS.

No negotiations. They will be deported.

DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!

More mindless cut and paste.
If all your blathering is accurate, why did the Trump admin admit they screwed up by deporting him?
 
Back
Top