Should people get a hearing before being deported? Due Process.

No life, liberty, or property has been deprived by the United States, moron. He was deported.

Don't try to hide behind the Constitution you despise.
He was indeed 'deported', yes. Without due process. He was sent to another country without due process. Should I be able to grab you and remove you from the country and claim that you were deported with due process?
 
The worst of it is Trump is taking away due process. If he gets away with doing it to people the right does not approve of, so they do not care, what do they do when he escalates? That is what Trump always does. Taking away rights is a process for dictators.
 
Had Due Process happened, the guy in El Salvador would not have been sent to that prison.

We allowed a president to send someone to a prison, and use tax dollars to do it, who has been convicted of NO crime.

This cannot stand. I would hope Trump would not do that you intentionally, but if we let him do that to anyone, what is to stop a future president from doing it?
Everyone in the United States or territories governed by the US comes under the Constitution. So, yes, they should get Due Process, not a kangaroo court or less.
 
The worst of it is Trump is taking away due process. If he gets away with doing it to people the right does not approve of, so they do not care, what do they do when he escalates? That is what Trump always does. Taking away rights is a process for dictators.
How much "due process" did the US get when these illegals snuck into the country?
 
How much "due process" did the US get when these illegals snuck into the country?
It's really sad that your mind is going, Terry. Has the Missus stuck you in a "home" yet? The question is unanswerable.

Why did Trump kill the Immigration bill? Why hasn't Congress passed a new one? Why not beef up E-verify? Require it for all employees of businesses with over 100 employees? Apartment and other rental properties? Start locking up those businesses that hire, harbor and otherwise entice illegal immigration and overstaying visas?
 
Had Due Process happened, the guy in El Salvador would not have been sent to that prison.

We allowed a president to send someone to a prison, and use tax dollars to do it, who has been convicted of NO crime.

This cannot stand. I would hope Trump would not do that you intentionally, but if we let him do that to anyone, what is to stop a future president from doing it?
Why weren't you worried about due process when they were illegally flooding into the country?
 
Had Due Process happened, the guy in El Salvador would not have been sent to that prison.

We allowed a president to send someone to a prison, and use tax dollars to do it, who has been convicted of NO crime.

This cannot stand. I would hope Trump would not do that you intentionally, but if we let him do that to anyone, what is to stop a future president from doing it?
Did you snatch that "courtroom cuddle for every border-jumper" claptrap from your dog-eared guide to Woke Nonsense 101? Your Trump-hating hysterics are so shrill they could curdle your organic oat milk. For one minute scrape that orange-man obsession from your kale-clogged noggin and beam yourself to a pre-TDS universe. Now tell me why we'd squander a judge's lunch break on some rando who can't flash a US citizen ID? Case slammed shut sneak in get thrown out no pitstops at Amnesty Avenue.

We're drowning in over a million backlogged hearings with millions more piling up for bullshit amnesty cases. That said, this is why Trump just required all non-citizens to register within 30 days, then day 31, bam they're lawbreakers ripe for the deportation express, no hearing needed.

Judges got zero say on illegal aliens the Constitution slaps that power square in the executive branch's lap, end of story. So, their "due process" is whatever the exec feels like serving. Instead of parroting some libtard judge's power trip or "expert" hot air you read on HuffPost, try pointing me to where the judiciary gets to stick its nose in the executive's deportation playbook. Go on name one shred of constitutional text that says anyone can whine about how the exec boots non-citizens. I'll wait while you fumble through your feelings for an answer.
 
Did you snatch that "courtroom cuddle for every border-jumper" claptrap from your dog-eared guide to Woke Nonsense 101? Your Trump-hating hysterics are so shrill they could curdle your organic oat milk. For one minute scrape that orange-man obsession from your kale-clogged noggin and beam yourself to a pre-TDS universe. Now tell me why we'd squander a judge's lunch break on some rando who can't flash a US citizen ID? Case slammed shut sneak in get thrown out no pitstops at Amnesty Avenue.

We're drowning in over a million backlogged hearings with millions more piling up for bullshit amnesty cases. That said, this is why Trump just required all non-citizens to register within 30 days, then day 31, bam they're lawbreakers ripe for the deportation express, no hearing needed.

Judges got zero say on illegal aliens the Constitution slaps that power square in the executive branch's lap, end of story. So, their "due process" is whatever the exec feels like serving. Instead of parroting some libtard judge's power trip or "expert" hot air you read on HuffPost, try pointing me to where the judiciary gets to stick its nose in the executive's deportation playbook. Go on name one shred of constitutional text that says anyone can whine about how the exec boots non-citizens. I'll wait while you fumble through your feelings for an answer.
Prosecution of federal crimes is the sole discretion of the executive branch, still can’t put anyone in prison without a trial.

Read the 14th Amendment.
 
Prosecution of federal crimes is the sole discretion of the executive branch, still can’t put anyone in prison without a trial.

Read the 14th Amendment.
I did, and then we start talking about due process. I wonder if we can use the Obama model? Oh, yes we can, (wasn't that his slogan) The executive gets wide latitude with borders and immigration, including what that due process is. It's not judge libtard in DC, it's Pam Bondi's Federal Immagration Judge that glances at a sheet of paper and says deport, no hearing necessary in most cases, just like the Obama admin. Go check to see how Obama deported over 3 million.
 
I did, and then we start talking about due process. I wonder if we can use the Obama model? Oh, yes we can, (wasn't that his slogan) The executive gets wide latitude with borders and immigration, including what that due process is. It's not judge libtard in DC, it's Pam Bondi's Federal Immagration Judge that glances at a sheet of paper and says deport, no hearing necessary in most cases, just like the Obama admin. Go check to see how Obama deported over 3 million.
If Obama did it the way The Sleepy Felon is doing it, its wrong.
 
The worst of it is Trump is taking away due process.
None required, Sybil.
If he gets away with doing it to people the right does not approve of, so they do not care, what do they do when he escalates? That is what Trump always does.
Void argument fallacy.
Taking away rights is a process for dictators.
There is no right here. An illegal alien broke the law and is immediately subject to deportation...no hearing required.
 
Back
Top