B/C you created it right before you took the picture.
Yeah I did. No need to save porn, just go surfing.
Show me your desktops
- Thread starter BRUTALITOPS
- Start date
Yeah I did. No need to save porn, just go surfing.
.
Stick with Samsung or ViewSonic - it's worth the extra few bucks for the quality.
Here is a Samsung 19" W LCD for $169.99 after rebate:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001100
If you'd like something bigger, check out this 22":
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001262
Avoid off-brand monitors.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
That's NOT the best monitor on the market. The one I proposed is in no way an off-brand monitor, and it is way more professional. It costs 1600 dollars after all.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
This is my system. My monitor is the 21 inch version of the one shown, but I don't really know anymore than that.
SHITTY ASS PIECE O SHIT
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Here's my computer:
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Actually XPS is pretty good. Pretty much all brands perform the same with good parts, and XPS indicates good parts.
Watermark: I'm referring to consumer monitors, which would best suit Epicurus or just about anyone else, for that matter. I didn't even click on your links. But, thanks anyway.
I'll be buying the 22" for my new gaming rig in the next few weeks. I'm going for the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400, a 780i-based mobo (probably EVGA), 8GB memory, and two GTX 260s. For storage, I'll have four Seagate 500GB drives in a RAID-5 configuration, with Windows Vista Ulimate 64-bit to top it off. It's gonna scream.
Last edited:
Actually, I'm still deciding between RAID-0 and RAID-5.
The benefit of RAID-5 is redundancy, but at the expense of the capacity of one drive.
The benefit of RAID-0 is I don't lose the capacity of one drive, but if even one of the four drives fail, I'm screwed. That's the downside.
The benefit of RAID-5 is redundancy, but at the expense of the capacity of one drive.
The benefit of RAID-0 is I don't lose the capacity of one drive, but if even one of the four drives fail, I'm screwed. That's the downside.
you really think 8gb is necessary? 4 is probably overkill.
brent i want to see your desktop.
uscitizen
Villified User
4 is nice in my laptop. 8 would be nice if heavy into graphics intensive gaming. Or video editing.
I want a terrabyte of ram
heck with that mechanical storage.
Either 4 or 8 - I haven't decided.
It depends on whether I buy this or this. If the former, I can justify throwing in another 4GB for a total of eight. If the latter (for extreme performance), I'd hold off and stick to 4GB - it's currently too expensive.
Two GTX 260s is probably overkill, too, but at least I won't have to upgrade during the life of the computer. All of my systems in the past have been mid-range. This time around, I want something really nice.
4 is nice in my laptop. 8 would be nice if heavy into graphics intensive gaming. Or video editing.
I want a terrabyte of ram
heck with that mechanical storage.
Four GB is still very good, especially for a notebook.
(In fact, I haven't heard of a notebook with over 4GB)
I agree about the magnetic storage. Thankfully, change is on the way!
