Sick to death of all the sock accounts around here

[Into the Night]

No you grow up.

LIF. Grow up.

 

[Magats_Love_NHB]

LIF. Grow up.

32G Age discrimination

 

[IBDaMann]

That isn't what I said.

It is what you meant. Leftists, such as yourself, are characterized by below-average intelligence and severe undereducation. There are simply too many concepts being bandied about at the adult's table that leftists just cannot grasp. As a result, they lump all the purveyors of these "confusing" ideas into the same category ... and treat as though they are the same person ... in order to make thew widdow thelves feew much beddow.

Your pathetic self-delusion problem becomes an issue when you beg the site administrator to start canceling people's accounts to legitimize your self-delusion that all of these people are somehow actually the same person. Even when the administrator tells you that the accounts to which you refer are not socks, you pull your safe-space omniscience as a trump card and insist that the administrator must be mistaken, because the alternative would mean that all the people of your mindless collective really are the stupidest people on the internet.

You and your ilk are, in fact, the stupidest people on the internet, thus explaining your total dishonesty and your complete intellectual cowardice.

Just for laughs, try one more time. Beg Damocles to get rid of all the sock accounts that annoy you. Offer to bend over furniture for him; I know you believe that has successfully worked for you in the past

You can run this place how you want.

Damocles will be pleased to hear that. He was sweating there for a moment.

I pointed out you are the only place that allows for this strange behavior.

You didn't "point out" anything. Something has to be real, not merely deluded, to be "pointed out." You should just sit back down at the kids' table and resume coloring as your thought masters dictate.

I don't know who thread director is nor do I care.

Yet you dedicated real estate in your post just to him. I bet he didn't even know you cared.

 

[IBDaMann]

32G Age discrimination

If you need more crayons sent over to the kids' table, just let me know.

 

[IBDaMann]

I didn't vote tRump because he said the constitution should be suspended when he thought an election had been "rigged" against him.

I believe you misinterpreted what was said.

 

[IBDaMann]

Are you saying you can't say what you want here?

You are asking the administrator for censorship, specifically of differing views. Are you saying that no one can comment on that?

 

[Damocles]

I believe you misinterpreted what was said.

No, I didn't. Bolded below is the important bit from the quote from Truth Social.

“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution, ... Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!” - Donald J. Trump

Anyway, nobody was confused... Even Ted Cruz understood that he was wrong to suggest it.

Cruz: “Of course” Trump was wrong to call for terminating Constitution

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz condemned the comment by the former president, but he also said that reporters were overblowing the story and should instead “focus on what matters.” Sen. John Cornyn called the move “irresponsible” on Monday.

www.texastribune.org

 

[AProudLefty]

Someone says something?

 

[goat]

I didn't vote tRump because he said the constitution should be suspended when he thought an election had been "rigged" against him. I don't care who you are, you will lose my vote if you suggest that we should ever "suspend the constitution" or even if you suggest it is to "be interpreted" as a "living document" and we can just change the bill of rights because you don't believe the government should have limited power. That document is less about what the government can do to you than an important list of crap the Government cannot do to us.

Patriot acts did away with the constitution.

 

[AProudLefty]

He deleted his post!

 

[IBDaMann]

No, I didn't.

You confirmed for me that you did, in fact, misinterpret, with Trump being responsible for usual poor wording.

Donald Trump won the election. Criminal activity ensued to nullify the election and to instill Joe Biden. If Donald Trump had instead used better wording to say the same thing, how could you disagree?

e.g. “Do you ignore illegal fake/forged/counterfeit results and disqualify the cheating candidate, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the fraud to be discarded/ignored and for the criminals to be prosecuted, no matter how the fraud conforms in appearance to the procedures spelled out in the Constitution, ... Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”

You became triggered over wording without listening to the message and merely explaining your disagreement with the wording.

Anyway, nobody was confused...

You were confused.

Even Ted Cruz understood that he was wrong to suggest it.

You don't speak for Ted Cruz.

I'm merely saying that you experienced a misunderstanding, that your misunderstanding is understandable, but that you can avoid this sort of misunderstanding in the future by not allowing yourself to become triggered over wording like WOKE people do. If you don't like particular wording, open a discussion about the wording you don't like.

 

[Damocles]

You confirmed for me that you did, in fact, misinterpret, with Trump being responsible for usual poor wording.

Donald Trump won the election. Criminal activity ensued to nullify the election and to instill Joe Biden. If Donald Trump had instead used better wording to say the same thing, how could you disagree?

e.g. “Do you ignore illegal fake/forged/counterfeit results and disqualify the cheating candidate, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the fraud to be discarded/ignored and for the criminals to be prosecuted, no matter how the fraud conforms in appearance to the procedures spelled out in the Constitution, ... Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”

You became triggered over wording without listening to the message and merely explaining your disagreement with the wording.


You were confused.


You don't speak for Ted Cruz.

I'm merely saying that you experienced a misunderstanding, that your misunderstanding is understandable, but that you can avoid this sort of misunderstanding in the future by not allowing yourself to become triggered over wording like WOKE people do. If you don't like particular wording, open a discussion about the wording you don't like.

I quoted Ted Cruz and gave you a link to the story where he said it.

You are simply ready to be an apologist for someone who thinks he is more important than the constitution simply because you didn't want to vote for his opponent. I get that. You were willing to look past HUGE problems to ensure that Kamala didn't get into office and I get that. I really do. It wasn't enough for me to look past someone who thought they were more important than the constitution, even if he tried to walk it back later.

You will not convince me to follow you down that road. You are not "confused" you are deliberately lying to yourself.

 

[IBDaMann]

I quoted Ted Cruz and gave you a link to the story where he said it.

I read it. You are apparently a little more WOKE than does you good.

You are simply ready to be an apologist

Now you are hurling the word "apologist" as a slur against someone who simply tries to explain to you one of your misunderstandings.

... because you didn't want to vote for his opponent.

I wasn't going to vote for Kimuki, but that's not the "because."

You will not convince me to follow you down that road.

... of logic and reason. You really should read/listen for meaning, not for being triggered. Emotion does not the best analysis make.

I adhere to the Constitution. I don't support anyone who violates, or seeks to violate, the Constitution. Pay attention a little more closely next time and listen/read for comprehension, unless you really can't bring yourself to go down that road.

You are not "confused" you are deliberately lying to yourself.

You are. Your dishonesty with yourself began the moment you allowed yourself to become triggered. There was clearly no reasoning with you at that point.

 

[Magats_Love_NHB]

If you need more crayons sent over to the kids' table, just let me know.

What's the problem of responding just like he does?

 

[Magats_Love_NHB]

You are asking the administrator for censorship, specifically of differing views. Are you saying that no one can comment on that?

What?

 

[Damocles]

I read it. You are apparently a little more WOKE than does you good.


Now you are hurling the word "apologist" as a slur against someone who simply tries to explain to you one of your misunderstandings.


I wasn't going to vote for Kimuki, but that's not the "because."


... of logic and reason. You really should read/listen for meaning, not for being triggered. Emotion does not the best analysis make.

I adhere to the Constitution. I don't support anyone who violates, or seeks to violate, the Constitution. Pay attention a little more closely next time and listen/read for comprehension, unless you really can't bring yourself to go down that road.


You are. Your dishonesty with yourself began the moment you allowed yourself to become triggered. There was clearly no reasoning with you at that point.

Ah, the "I know you are, but what am I?" defense. It's a classic, but doesn't pass muster to anyone older than nine years old. I imagine you think you made some salient point here, and that this was a "burn" or something. I'll let folks read what you've written and compare it to what I have written and let them decide.

I believe that you would vote for that "yellow dog over there" if it were republican because it isn't the Democrat. I will not. I won't vote for Democrats, true.... but I also won't vote for republicans that suggest that "terminating" ANY part of the constitution is a good idea. That wasn't "accidental bad wording" that was a man who thought that "terminating" sections of what I believe to be the most important document in history was a good idea simply to "fix" what he thought was a personal injustice. Before that day he had a chance to win my vote, after that day he did not.

 

[IBDaMann]

Ah, the "I know you are, but what am I?" defense.

Were you intending to respond to my post, or did you get your threads confused?

I believe that you would vote for that "yellow dog over there" if it were republican because it isn't the Democrat.

I don't support any political party. I'm MAGA. I will vote against any Republican that isn't MAGA.

I will not. I won't vote for Democrats, true.... but I also won't vote for republicans that suggest that "terminating" ANY part of the constitution is a good idea.

Nope. You won't vote for anyone who suggests that criminal activity not be rewarded. It's a stupid position to have. Trump suggested the cheating not be recognized, he used the wrong word in your mind, you got triggered, you refused to listen or to go back and reread, and you ended up supporting the legitimization of election-stealing just because you were acting irrationally.

That wasn't "accidental bad wording"

Of course not. It was just regular poor wording. Did you see my wording? What did you think of it? Oh, that's right, you're stuck in your irrationality and you won't read it. I guess we're done.

that was a man who thought that "terminating" sections of what I believe to be the most important document in history was a good idea simply to "fix" what he thought was a personal injustice.

Nope. You totally misunderstood, and now it's deliberate on your part. Enjoy.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I don't support any political party. I'm MAGA

Nope. You totally misunderstood, and now it's deliberate on your part. Enjoy.

The Pedo Party is a political party, nitwit.

Typical Sybilism.

 

[LurchAddams]

Its dishonest and quite frankly pretty damn childish and weird. I think a forum vote needs to be put up to do away with them and a new rule imposed of ONE account and one account only. ZERO socks. If the vote comes up favoring my proposal then it gets passed on to our CEO Damo for his approval or disapproval. Who's with me? Its high time we put an end to this nonsense for good imo.....

I'm with you 100% on this one, sir! Happy New Year to both you and yours!

 

[LurchAddams]

I think it's kinda childish and weird to give a shit.

I disagree. This forum is for entertainment, I get that. But.. it is a political opinion forum where integrity/confidence in your own beliefs should count for something. To create a different persona is both dishonest and childish in a forum of this kind. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it!