Simple fact about the right wing leader

SO this grooves what, all it says is that they contributed to his election , well big whoopy they also contributed to his opponent. Good try though. LBJ had no connection to the company. Cheney was Halliburton and Bush the baby killer is Carlyle. Big difference.

Believe what you want. I can see that there is definitely no swaying you from your assumptions.
 
You don't understand that China depends more on our consumption than we depend on their production. Even before the trade war, production was leaving China for cheaper countries. The trade war expedited this.
Your ridiculous , The polished turd put his first tariff on China in Jan 2018 then increased them in March and April and The GDP of China went from 6.7 to 6.8 in that period Ya they need us in a big way. They still have a massive GDP of 6.4% and it is expected to stay there for some time. The insanity is your rooting for a trade war with our biggest trading partner that's stupid. All you have to do is look at every single one of the turds tarrif wars with all our allies and you find out they gave up nothing that they couldn't have gotten by just asking. He is a fucking idiot and you love him for it. . By the way we gave up something also and guess what , the polished turd will get nothing from China , China increased their trade by lowering tariffs on all the other countries. He's a idiot and his supporters are idiots. What a joke. Your trade war that you are rooting for is absolutely stupid. We gained shit and made enemy's of our allies , Ya that's a winner.
 
Your ridiculous , The polished turd put his first tariff on China in Jan 2018 then increased them in March and April and The GDP of China went from 6.7 to 6.8 in that period Ya they need us in a big way. They still have a massive GDP of 6.4% and it is expected to stay there for some time. The insanity is your rooting for a trade war with our biggest trading partner that's stupid. All you have to do is look at every single one of the turds tarrif wars with all our allies and you find out they gave up nothing that they couldn't have gotten by just asking. He is a fucking idiot and you love him for it. . By the way we gave up something also and guess what , the polished turd will get nothing from China , China increased their trade by lowering tariffs on all the other countries. He's a idiot and his supporters are idiots. What a joke. Your trade war that you are rooting for is absolutely stupid. We gained shit and made enemy's of our allies , Ya that's a winner.

When you're done hyperventilating, try to read the following with some comprehension.

China is currently running on a lot more private debt than we are. They've spent a lot of money on artificially propping up their middle class with personal loans. This has resulted in an increase of standard of living for much of their urban population, but it isn't sustainable. In addition, their government essentially runs most of their industries. The central planning approach involves a lot of waste. To maintain construction growth, for example, they've built several ghost cities. While there are plenty of American companies that still do business with them, the Chinese economy is a house of cards.

It will crash eventually, and the upper management of China probably realizes this. This is part of why they've done so much to try and establish various raw material supply chains in Africa and South America. If they can maintain a decent supply chain with those areas, that will postpone the crash (and will prevent massive starvation), but this approach has its own problems. In order to construct the infrastructures needed for these supply chains, they've lent out a ton of money to various African countries and Latin American ones. The prospect of getting this money back is slim. The gains from the raw materials will offset the money spent somewhat, but it isn't likely to cover the overall expenses anytime soon. So the related debt puts pressure on their system, in addition to the private debt I mentioned above.

The trade war has exacerbated their situation somewhat, because the tariffs reduce our consumption of their products while encouraging our companies to shift production to places like India, Pakistan, or Indonesia. No trade war can be done without some harm to one's own country, but China has felt the pain more than us. This is shown by recent events.

https://time.com/5749668/us-china-trade-deal/
 
When you're done hyperventilating, try to read the following with some comprehension.

China is currently running on a lot more private debt than we are. They've spent a lot of money on artificially propping up their middle class with personal loans. This has resulted in an increase of standard of living for much of their urban population, but it isn't sustainable. In addition, their government essentially runs most of their industries. The central planning approach involves a lot of waste. To maintain construction growth, for example, they've built several ghost cities. While there are plenty of American companies that still do business with them, the Chinese economy is a house of cards.

It will crash eventually, and the upper management of China probably realizes this. This is part of why they've done so much to try and establish various raw material supply chains in Africa and South America. If they can maintain a decent supply chain with those areas, that will postpone the crash (and will prevent massive starvation), but this approach has its own problems. In order to construct the infrastructures needed for these supply chains, they've lent out a ton of money to various African countries and Latin American ones. The prospect of getting this money back is slim. The gains from the raw materials will offset the money spent somewhat, but it isn't likely to cover the overall expenses anytime soon. So the related debt puts pressure on their system, in addition to the private debt I mentioned above.

The trade war has exacerbated their situation somewhat, because the tariffs reduce our consumption of their products while encouraging our companies to shift production to places like India, Pakistan, or Indonesia. No trade war can be done without some harm to one's own country, but China has felt the pain more than us. This is shown by recent events.

https://time.com/5749668/us-china-trade-deal/
What in the world gives you the idea that I would be interested enough to look through your garbage heap of opinions. You are worth a sentence or two but not this essay, Was it copy paste. . I think by my comments in reference to what you have written here. that You would understand that I think what you are saying is nothing but bullshit. Your just another right wing hater as far as I can see. You will never let a fact get in the way of your opinion.
 
What in the world gives you the idea that I would be interested enough to look through your garbage heap of opinions. You are worth a sentence or two but not this essay, Was it copy paste. . I think by my comments in reference to what you have written here. that You would understand that I think what you are saying is nothing but bullshit. Your just another right wing hater as far as I can see. You will never let a fact get in the way of your opinion.

This is pretty priceless. You claim I won't let facts get in the way of my opinion, but you're the one who won't even read my link.
 
This is pretty priceless. You claim I won't let facts get in the way of my opinion, but you're the one who won't even read my link.
and in fact I never will, you clearly defined who you were exactly with what you had said in the earlier part of this thread. Your claim to anything that could pass for facts would be by accident only.
 
So you think Iran would survive a war with us? The most likely outcome is that Iran's government would be toppled, and the new regime would no longer do business with Russia.

Iran is 4 times the area that Iraq is and it is very mountainous. Yeah, they would survive like every other country we attacked. Did Korea survive? How about Viet Nam. The most likely scenario is about 20 years of death and destruction and a few trillion dollars ending in a no-decision.
Iran is also adept at cyber war.
 
Iran is 4 times the area that Iraq is and it is very mountainous. Yeah, they would survive like every other country we attacked. Did Korea survive? How about Viet Nam. The most likely scenario is about 20 years of death and destruction and a few trillion dollars ending in a no-decision.

I guess we define survival differently. I'm referring to whether the current regime of Iran would survive. Yes, most of the population would survive.

What makes no sense whatsoever is this assumption that Putin would want us to attack Iran.
 
and in fact I never will, you clearly defined who you were exactly with what you had said in the earlier part of this thread. Your claim to anything that could pass for facts would be by accident only.

I guess you like being ignored then. This will be my last post to you.
 
When it comes to war, both parties are right-wing.

America is. We still have a John Wayne idea of glorious wars. War is hell but we send others to fight them. We do not learn .
Yet we lose them to countries with no air force, no navy and no weaponry that matches ours. The lesson is people fight like hell to protect their homeland. And when you fight on their turf, they have an advantage.
We also do not fight here. If we had to rebuild our infrastructure after them, we might think differently. If we buried 100K of our native sons, would we stop warring?
 
America is. We still have a John Wayne idea of glorious wars. War is hell but we send others to fight them. We do not learn .
Yet we lose them to countries with no air force, no navy and no weaponry that matches ours. The lesson is people fight like hell to protect their homeland. And when you fight on their turf, they have an advantage.
We also do not fight here. If we had to rebuild our infrastructure after them, we might think differently. If we buried 100K of our native sons, would we stop warring?

Well, we lose because of multiple things.

1) the media doesn't exactly help things. From Vietnam onwards, they've been very negative in most coverage. If the same coverage had been done during WW2, we would've called a truce with the Japanese and Nazis.

2) our rules of engagement aren't very practical oftentimes.
 
Well, we lose because of multiple things.

1) the media doesn't exactly help things. From Vietnam onwards, they've been very negative in most coverage. If the same coverage had been done during WW2, we would've called a truce with the Japanese and Nazis.

2) our rules of engagement aren't very practical oftentimes.

We glorify war in America in our-talk, our books , tv show, and movies. It is not negative, There is no positive. Guns, bombs, and killing are not positive. We travel across the globe fighting and losing to nations with no air force, no navy and a fraction of the military and come home empty,
Part of the American psyche has to include a sense of guilt for the damage and death we have exported to foreign lands. How many deaths are on our hands?We do not even know why we fight many of them.
 
We glorify war in America in our-talk, our books , tv show, and movies. It is not negative, There is no positive. Guns, bombs, and killing are not positive. We travel across the globe fighting and losing to nations with no air force, no navy and a fraction of the military and come home empty,
Part of the American psyche has to include a sense of guilt for the damage and death we have exported to foreign lands. How many deaths are on our hands?We do not even know why we fight many of them.

I haven't seen much glorification of any war more recent than WW2. Most media concerning war after that, at most, glorifies the sacrifices of our soldiers. They don't typically paint a glorified picture of the war itself.

As far as guilt goes, I don't feel any guilt for that stuff. I didn't make those calls, and I didn't have a choice in the funding of said calls.
 
Back
Top