Size of holes in mask vs size of coronavirus

So why are you asking for hole size in masks if you know that it is irrelevant? If you actually had the answer you would know that N95 masks can filter out over 95% of individual viruses that might be floating in the air.

You don't seem to understand what this thread is about. This thread is meant to establish the size of coronavirus compared to the size of the openings in masks. That's it.
 
masks fucking work. It is just that easy. https://www.ucdavis.edu/coronavirus/news/your-mask-cuts-own-risk-65-percent/ They help you and those you encounter. They have been evaluated and proven to work bigly.

You don't seem to understand what this thread is about. This thread is meant to establish the size of coronavirus compared to the size of the openings in masks. That's it. It is not about if masks work or not, or about how masks work. This thread is only meant to establish the size of the openings ib masks compared to the size of coronavirus. That's it.
 
You don't seem to understand what this thread is about. This thread is meant to establish the size of coronavirus compared to the size of the openings in masks. That's it.

Which is a completely meaningless thing to establish.

You might as well establish the size of the coronavirus and the size of a Tyrannosaurus Rex. It would have as much relevance since the size of a Tyrannosaurus Rex does as much to stop the coronavirus as the size of openings in masks does.
 
In other words, holes. Spaces between fibers. So yes, you are still a stupid fuck. As well as anyone thanking you.

The size of fibers in microns says nothing about the space between them.
They could be 1 micron apart or 2 inches apart. and the size of the fibers doesn't change.
It seems you are incapable of understanding that.
 
The size of fibers in microns says nothing about the space between them.
They could be 1 micron apart or 2 inches apart. and the size of the fibers doesn't change.
It seems you are incapable of understanding that.

Keep trying to save face here PRS. You cannot. Obviously you tried to make someone look foolish with your copy and paste and fake intellect arrogance on a subject you know nothing about. As your keep proving. Seriously, educate yourself, come on back. No worries, I will be waiting to make you look like the idiot you are.
 
ROFLMAO..

You got me.. Your ipse dixit disproves all the science out there. I humbly await an actual link from you supporting your elevated knowledge so I can read it and bow to your superior third grade reading comprehension.
 
This would lead one to wonder how masks filter out the virus. Now that we have established how big the item is that we want to filter out, as well as the size of the holes in the filter, we can then move on to establishing the smallest size of droplet or droplet nuclei and compare THAT to the size of the holes in the filter...

They dont filter the virus, they filter the medium the virus travels in.
 
Now, those masks with the breather vent... Those are universally claimed as useless.

PM-2-5-Face-Mask-With-Valve-Element-Prevent-Pollution-Adult-Kids-Reusable-Washable-Mouth-Facial-1.jpg
 
How is this relevant to establishing the two sizes that the thread is about? Is orange man bad too?

You are against masks and pro-Trump. That is why you do these insane threads. The smaller the holes the better. Is that what you are after.?That could be done in a sentence. However, you have a string of threads against masks. They all count. This is not a one-off. We are not stupid and know what you are doing.
 
I suppose a mask knitted out of yarn would be less efficient. But even that would do some good. It would catch some moisture drops coming and going.
 
Back
Top