uscitizen
Villified User
Please tell me you are not one of those UPS/FedEx...dudes who wear shorts in the dead of winter to impress the girls working the stores?
Hmm I had not thought about that, with my legs.....
Please tell me you are not one of those UPS/FedEx...dudes who wear shorts in the dead of winter to impress the girls working the stores?
His attempt was all just lip service like the rest of him.
Was an SS reform bill submitted ?
Yes, but I dwell in reality. "Supposed to be" wasn't followed. SS is just another line item in the general funds both on the expense and the income sides.SS was supposed to be a seperate issue from the general budget and taxes.
No I'm self employed and wear baggy ski bibs in the dead of winter to impress 'em.Please tell me you are not one of those UPS/FedEx...dudes who wear shorts in the dead of winter to impress the girls working the stores?
I didn't say that it was. You should have your choice, and I should have mine.But it is not only about you, no insurance is.
The President cannot submit bills
Or, the stock market could take a dive, and you could lose everything. Or you could live until your 120, and your saving account would dry up. I'll bet you wish you had that guaranteed pension for life no matter what then - oh, but it's welfare!
Actually its 6.2% x 2. But you are correct, it is just another tax, and only a portion of the money is used to fund the actual program. Therefore the program is a lie. I typically get angry when lied to.I don't see why people get so angry over SS in general. Over the government spending the money that is supposed to insure people's futures, yeah. But over the idea?
I think that any person who relied on this for retirement has a totally different idea of what the "High Life" is, or they must....
I just see it as another tax on 15% of my income (7.5% from me, the other 7.5% from the employer to hide the real cost of SS from the uneducated), that is spent in the general fund and see SS as another line item on a bloated budget.
Umm the repubs were in control of congress for several years, and they seemed to do just what Bush told them to do.
Try another tack there Superhack.
1) He did not say invest in the stock market
2) At the time of retirement (using his example) the couple could take the $1.5 million and purchase an annuity (they could also add a rider for LTC). This would create a guaranteed income stream for life. The same as SS is supposed to be, yet, SS is NOT guaranteed. (note... the politicians are already talking about LOWERING benefits)
3) Using the above, you would also guarantee that your beneficiaries would recieve any unused portion of the assets rather than the government simply keeping them.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, the days of stretch ski pants are over. I read a tounge-in-cheek article a while back that this has caused the sport to be less popular.Ski bibs ? How trendy.
No I'm self employed and wear baggy ski bibs in the dead of winter to impress 'em.
Actually its 6.2% x 2. But you are correct, it is just another tax, and only a portion of the money is used to fund the actual program. Therefore the program is a lie. I typically get angry when lied to.
Social Security isn't an investment program. It's a retirement insurance program. You're comparing apples and aardvarks.
YOU are calling me a hack. That is humorous considering the vast majority of your posts are one liners with little relevance to the thread at hand. Perhaps you should leave again and regroup. Maybe you could actually contribute something meaningful to the board.
He's trying to put the discussion on the proper track. You are criticizing Social Security from an investment perspective when Social Security isn't an investment program. It's an insurance program.