Some questions for honest folk

they are supposed to involve serious matters. Even misdemeanors are criminal in nature

but thanks for admitting what a nothing burger this is.

Let’s try again, idiot. I’ll type as slowly as I can.

1) Even in criminal investigations, the subject of the investigation DOES NOT GET TO PARTICIPATE. No right to face the accuser at all.

2) Impeachments ARE NOT CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS, idiot. The same rules DO NOT apply.

Was that dumbed down enough for you, dullard?
 
Let’s try again, idiot. I’ll type as slowly as I can.

you can type as slow as you want - just be careful with all the drool on your keyboard

as you type slowly - look up where the whistleblower has a right to be hidden. That is a bullshit lie and you fucking know it
 
you can type as slow as you want - just be careful with all the drool on your keyboard

as you type slowly - look up where the whistleblower has a right to be hidden. That is a bullshit lie and you fucking know it

lol

Remember, bitch, you don’t want 2nd hand info. You want first hand. Bolton, Perry, Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani.

Fucking hypocrite.

:rofl2:
 
Because we already have more than enough evidence to know Trump is guilty of these crimes.

No, you don't. You had a two year investigation where you claimed there was Russian Collusion and came up with NOTHING as well. After a while, you would think that even the biggest moron on the planet could get a clue. :rolleyes:
 
lol

Remember, bitch, you don’t want 2nd hand info. You want first hand. Bolton, Perry, Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani.

Fucking hypocrite.

:rofl2:


thanks for the pointing out the second lie

a whistleblower needs first hand knowledge to be an actual whisteblower.

you shit stains are making a mockery of everything.
 
honest question

why do liberal politicians and liberal media get to lie about the whistle blower being anonymous?

We know that is a lie. what does that say when the media allows one political party to lie over and over about something so easy to prove as a lie?

Why does the right want to out him? Revenge? You bitch about second hand information and that’s what he has. Why have Bolton, Pompeo, Giuliani, Perry, Mulvaney hidden? Those are the first handers, pal.

The WB’s account has been corroborated by numerous others. No need to exact your revenge on him.

Got something to hide?

a central tenet of our foundation is we get to face our accuser. We want to avoid the Star Chamber style of justice, so we ran from that style. Why are you allowing it to come back?

A central tenet of CRIMINAL LAW and even then, the subject of the investigation does not get to participate, dumbfuck. You morons need to get it out of your pin heads that impeachment proceeding are criminal matters. They ARE NOT. The rights associated with criminal trials DO NOT apply.

they are supposed to involve serious matters. Even misdemeanors are criminal in nature

but thanks for admitting what a nothing burger this is.

Let’s try again, idiot. I’ll type as slowly as I can.

1) Even in criminal investigations, the subject of the investigation DOES NOT GET TO PARTICIPATE. No right to face the accuser at all.

2) Impeachments ARE NOT CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS, idiot. The same rules DO NOT apply.

Was that dumbed down enough for you, dullard?

you can type as slow as you want - just be careful with all the drool on your keyboard

as you type slowly - look up where the whistleblower has a right to be hidden. That is a bullshit lie and you fucking know it

lol

Remember, bitch, you don’t want 2nd hand info. You want first hand. Bolton, Perry, Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani.

Fucking hypocrite.

:rofl2:

The above is why you cannot have any kind of coherent, honest intellectual debate with an idiot like Domer76. Any questions?
 
thanks for the pointing out the second lie

a whistleblower needs first hand knowledge to be an actual whisteblower.

you shit stains are making a mockery of everything.

You can’t find any lies from me, bitch.

Where’s your boys, bitch? Why is Trump preventing them from testifying?
 
honest question

why do liberal politicians and liberal media get to lie about the whistle blower being anonymous?

We know that is a lie. what does that say when the media allows one political party to lie over and over about something so easy to prove as a lie?

How do we know it isn't true? oh yeah, Infowars says they know it. The Dems and real news have not released any name. Rightys claim they know. Schiff says he does not know who he is. That is true until you can prove otherwise and you cannot.
 
How do we know it isn't true? oh yeah, Infowars says they know it. The Dems and real news have not released any name. Rightys claim they know. Schiff says he does not know who he is. That is true until you can prove otherwise and you cannot.

stop with your nonsense, assjacker.
 
Back
Top