Some questions for honest folk

Robo said:
Isn't it wonderful madam how the democrats, CNN & MSNBC call a quid-pro-quo captured on a video of Joe Biden bragging about bribing a foreign government with taxpayer's money to obstruct justice by firing a foreign prosecutor because he was investigating his son HUNTER BIDEN, it's labeled a "CONSPIRACY," but when there's "ZERO" evidence of any Trump quid-pro-quo, it quickly becomes an "impeachable crime" as determined by democrats and their propaganda machine CNN & MSNBC to unseat a duly democratically elected President?
Click to expand...

I understand you do not know what that Biden thing was about. I know I have posted it before. Maybe you are that big Always Trumper that it makes you blind to facts..Biden simply told Ukraine that the US and European nations would not give a billion in loan guarantees if a certain crooked prosecutor was involved. Our allies all agreed with it. There was no investigation then and none now. This was awhile back when they all knew that Ukraine was very corrupt. The group did not want to make a crooked prosecutor rich.
 
StoneByStone said:
Because we already have more than enough evidence to know Trump is guilty of these crimes. TBH, I think Pelosi should have moved to impeach Trump after the Russia collusion, but she refused to. Pelosi never wanted to impeach Trump, she's not happy about what's happening now, but she knows she needs to do the right thing.
Click to expand...

What crimes?
 
Nordberg said:
I understand you do not know what that Biden thing was about. I know I have posted it before. Maybe you are that big Always Trumper that it makes you blind to facts..Biden simply told Ukraine that the US and European nations would not give a billion in loan guarantees if a certain crooked prosecutor was involved. Our allies all agreed with it. There was no investigation then and none now. This was awhile back when they all knew that Ukraine was very corrupt. The group did not want to make a crooked prosecutor rich.
Click to expand...

Who was the alleged "corrupt" prosecutor investigating and who was on the board of that corrupt company?
 
Robo said:
Who was the alleged "corrupt" prosecutor investigating and who was on the board of that corrupt company?
Click to expand...

Long before Hunter got on the board and it was not about Burisma. Can you really convince yourself of things like that? It was a crooked prosecutor who was stealing all he could get his hands on for years. His corruption was known. https://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-j...ney/C1C51BB8-3988-4070-869F-CAD3CA0E81D8.html So you cannot get the real drift of his discussion?
 
The republicans are having a hard time with this issue, when your cause is a loser, what can you do but make it a show and claim the crime isn't a crime because the crime isn't a crime. Repeat that over and over and some will think you are saying something.

'Tuesday’s impeachment hearings were a disaster for Republicans - Even their own witnesses said damaging stuff.'

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...ment-hearing-republicans-trump-vindman-volker

Republicans during this impeachment hearing remind us, "Act in such a way that the Fuhrer, if he knew your action, would approve it." Hans Frank, quoted in Arendt's 'Eichmann in Jerusalem'
 
Robo said:
Isn't it wonderful madam how the democrats, CNN & MSNBC call a quid-pro-quo captured on a video of Joe Biden bragging about bribing a foreign government with taxpayer's money to obstruct justice by firing a foreign prosecutor because he was investigating his son HUNTER BIDEN, it's labeled a "CONSPIRACY," but when there's "ZERO" evidence of any Trump quid-pro-quo, it quickly becomes an "impeachable crime" as determined by democrats and their propaganda machine CNN & MSNBC to unseat a duly democratically elected President?
Click to expand...

Fucking liar.
 
Nordberg said:
Long before Hunter got on the board and it was not about Burisma. Can you really convince yourself of things like that? It was a crooked prosecutor who was stealing all he could get his hands on for years. His corruption was known. https://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-j...ney/C1C51BB8-3988-4070-869F-CAD3CA0E81D8.html So you cannot get the real drift of his discussion?
Click to expand...

I can easily convince myself that the Biden boys had a "loot for Hunter for influence with Joe" scam going. Joe bragged about it and his ability of using America's taxpayer's dollars to prevent an investigation into such.

BTW, congrats on the Schiff cheering section your hero chairman had in place to applaud his closing fictitious statement, a disgrace to say the least.
 
honest question

why do liberal politicians and liberal media get to lie about the whistle blower being anonymous?

We know that is a lie. what does that say when the media allows one political party to lie over and over about something so easy to prove as a lie?
 
zymurgy said:
honest question

why do liberal politicians and liberal media get to lie about the whistle blower being anonymous?

We know that is a lie. what does that say when the media allows one political party to lie over and over about something so easy to prove as a lie?
Click to expand...

Why does the right want to out him? Revenge? You bitch about second hand information and that’s what he has. Why have Bolton, Pompeo, Giuliani, Perry, Mulvaney hidden? Those are the first handers, pal.

The WB’s account has been corroborated by numerous others. No need to exact your revenge on him.

Got something to hide?
 
domer76 said:
Why does the right want to out him? Revenge? You bitch about second hand information and that’s what he has. Why have Bolton, Pompeo, Giuliani, Perry, Mulvaney hidden? Those are the first handers, pal.

The WB’s account has been corroborated by numerous others. No need to exact your revenge on him.

Got something to hide?
Click to expand...
a central tenet of our foundation is we get to face our accuser. We want to avoid the Star Chamber style of justice, so we ran from that style. Why are you allowing it to come back?
 
zymurgy said:
a central tenet of our foundation is we get to face our accuser. We want to avoid the Star Chamber style of justice, so we ran from that style. Why are you allowing it to come back?
Click to expand...

A central tenet of CRIMINAL LAW and even then, the subject of the investigation does not get to participate, dumbfuck. You morons need to get it out of your pin heads that impeachment proceeding are criminal matters. They ARE NOT. The rights associated with criminal trials DO NOT apply.
 
domer76 said:
A central tenet of CRIMINAL LAW and even then, the subject of the investigation does not get to participate, dumbfuck. You morons need to get it out of your pin heads that impeachment proceeding are criminal matters. They ARE NOT. The rights associated with criminal trials DO NOT apply.
Click to expand...

they are supposed to involve serious matters. Even misdemeanors are criminal in nature

but thanks for admitting what a nothing burger this is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top