Some questions for honest folk

Jarod said:
There are good reasons it’s illegal to ask for such help in our elections. Lt. Colonel Vindman and Trump assistant Williams just pointed those out.
Click to expand...

No one asked anyone for help in an election. :rolleyes:

Vindman leaked the info to the ANONYMOUS FAKE WHISTLE BLOWER. He claims he doesn't know their name under oath. That is perjury.

Straw-Man_500.gif
 
ThatFOWLlWoman said:
I'll be pleased to correct you; thanks for asking. We (i.e. the representatives of us the American citizens) are investigating whether the POTUS attempted to extort or bribe a foreign leader by withholding already-authorized military aid, in exchange for an investigation into the POTUS's presumed 2020 rival -- a personal favor that would benefit *only* POTUS and no one else.
Click to expand...

WRONG;

We (i.e. the representatives of us the American citizens) are attempting to construct a false narrative that the POTUS attempted to extort or bribe a foreign leader by withholding already-authorized military aid, in exchange for an investigation into the POTUS's presumed 2020 rival.

Fixed that bullshit for you pathological liars.
 
Robo said:
Does anybody know how many of the people on the republican’s witness list Adam Schiff has approved and who they are? Has Adam approved Hunter & Joe Biden? When will they appear in the Kabuki theater show? Has Adam Schiff any concept of fairness? Why would any sane and honest person believe this Pelosi/Schiff attempt to shaft Donald Trump is anything other than a third world communist style kangaroo court?
Click to expand...

Let’s do this first.

Let Schiff refuse the same number of Republican witnesses as the number of Schiff’s witness list refused to show. Then we can start out at ground zero.
 
Truth Detector said:
WRONG;

We (i.e. the representatives of us the American citizens) are attempting to construct a false narrative that the POTUS attempted to extort or bribe a foreign leader by withholding already-authorized military aid, in exchange for an investigation into the POTUS's presumed 2020 rival.

Fixed that bullshit for you pathological liars.
Click to expand...

Liar
 
Robo said:
Does anybody know how many of the people on the republican’s witness list Adam Schiff has approved and who they are? Has Adam approved Hunter & Joe Biden? When will they appear in the Kabuki theater show? Has Adam Schiff any concept of fairness? Why would any sane and honest person believe this Pelosi/Schiff attempt to shaft Donald Trump is anything other than a third world communist style kangaroo court?
Click to expand...

they're not sane. they're globalist, psychotic nimrods.
 
Robo said:
Does anybody know how many of the people on the republican’s witness list Adam Schiff has approved and who they are? Has Adam approved Hunter & Joe Biden? When will they appear in the Kabuki theater show? Has Adam Schiff any concept of fairness? Why would any sane and honest person believe this Pelosi/Schiff attempt to shaft Donald Trump is anything other than a third world communist style kangaroo court?
Click to expand...

The 2 today were on the Republican list. The Bidens have nothing to do with this at all.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I'll be pleased to correct you; thanks for asking. We (i.e. the representatives of us the American citizens) are investigating whether the POTUS attempted to extort or bribe a foreign leader by withholding already-authorized military aid, in exchange for an investigation into the POTUS's presumed 2020 rival -- a personal favor that would benefit *only* POTUS and no one else. As you know, "quid pro quo" is nothing but a Latin phrase describing the exchange of one thing of value for an equal thing of value. For instance, if I offered to wash your car in exchange for you cutting my lawn -- that's a quid pro quo and is obviously not illegal. Extortion and bribery, on the other hand, are definitely illegal. If I told you that I'd have a friend at the power company cut off your electricity if you don't mow my lawn -- well, that's illegal, eh?

As for the rest of your specious claims about "liberal media" and "only Fox tells the truth" -- not interested.
Click to expand...

Yet the person you claim was extorted and bribed says he wasn't. That's the truth and even your left wing media reported it.
 
The liberal lunatics that posted on this thread prove once AGAIN that they are SO DAMNED DUMB. The stupidity never ends with these morons. It must be horrific to be THAT brainwashed and dumb.
 
RB 60 said:
Yet the person you claim was extorted and bribed says he wasn't. That's the truth and even your left wing media reported it.
Click to expand...

Yes, Zelensky stated that. What did you expect him to say, knowing that his country is dependent upon us and our military aid?

It's not necessary for the victim to agree with the criminal charge in order to indict/convict. I recall a criminal case of a grandson who was threatening his grandmother if she didn't give him money for drugs. When he was arrested she told the police that he was "a nice boy" and that she was voluntarily helping him out. The evidence showed otherwise and he went off to prison. This was back in STL; no doubt we could find dozens of similar stories from all over. I'm sure you've also seen instances where police arrest someone for domestic assault, the victim is standing there with a black eye or bloody nose, begging the cops not to take him away. They do anyways, eh?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Yes, Zelensky stated that. What did you expect him to say, knowing that his country is dependent upon us and our military aid?

It's not necessary for the victim to agree with the criminal charge in order to indict/convict. I recall a criminal case of a grandson who was threatening his grandmother if she didn't give him money for drugs. When he was arrested she told the police that he was "a nice boy" and that she was voluntarily helping him out. The evidence showed otherwise and he went off to prison. This was back in STL; no doubt we could find dozens of similar stories from all over. I'm sure you've also seen instances where police arrest someone for domestic assault, the victim is standing there with a black eye or bloody nose, begging the cops not to take him away. They do anyways, eh?
Click to expand...

there was also no crime however. aid was never withheld.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Yes, Zelensky stated that. What did you expect him to say, knowing that his country is dependent upon us and our military aid?

It's not necessary for the victim to agree with the criminal charge in order to indict/convict. I recall a criminal case of a grandson who was threatening his grandmother if she didn't give him money for drugs. When he was arrested she told the police that he was "a nice boy" and that she was voluntarily helping him out. The evidence showed otherwise and he went off to prison. This was back in STL; no doubt we could find dozens of similar stories from all over. I'm sure you've also seen instances where police arrest someone for domestic assault, the victim is standing there with a black eye or bloody nose, begging the cops not to take him away. They do anyways, eh?
Click to expand...

Zelensky isn't Trump's son. Some parents will cover for their children. I know for a fact mine never would.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
There's no reason to call witnesses who knew nothing about Trump attempting to extort/bribe a foreign leader for personal reasons. If you guys want to investigate the Bidens, you should have thought of that from January 2017 to January 2019 when you had a congress full of willing Reichwing puppets to do your bidding. Why weren't you calling for an investigation then?
Click to expand...

because it would have backfired on the republican congress much like their fast and Furious investigation that once they actually investigated it it showed Bush and team started the program and NOT Obama

they shut that investigation down very quickly
 
Zelensky Lied to protect Trump because without the funding and public backing of the Ukraine Russia would take them over Killing many Ukrainians

EVERYONE with a brain and a heart knows why he lied for Trump
 
evince said:
Zelensky Lied to protect Trump because without the funding and public backing of the Ukraine Russia would take them over Killing many Ukrainians

EVERYONE with a brain and a heart knows why he lied for Trump
Click to expand...

Everyone with a brain knows you can't prove what you claim.
 
Nobody has asked me, but I see Schiff doing an admirable job. Excellent, actually.

Nunez sounds like a complete buffoon to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top