Some questions for honest folk

Of course you'd believe that to be fair, but I'd submit we allow an equal number of republican witnesses, "AS CHOSEN BY THE REPUBLICANS," as have agreed to and been subpoenaed by Chairman Schiff to testify for his kangaroo circus.
.
You bitched about the WB because he was 2nd or 3rd hand info. Well bitch, Trump had all the first hand people refuse the subpoenas. Make up your mind, hypocrite. Which do you want?
 
the facts are totally in dispute.

trump has committed no crimes.

moral relativist luciferian globalists are upset trump is turning back their agenda.

luckily a moral populous is an effective bulwark against a corrupt government.

remove Putins cock from you mouth while you type


then maybe your posts will have some connections with the truth
 
Trumpanzees certainly are a scurge on the planet, as anybody who cares about the planet can clearly see.

Intelligent, sophisticated people are citizens of the world. Dumb crackers, not so much.

nope. you elitists are of average intelligence and brainwashed by pedophile bankers.
 
Let’s do this first.

Let Schiff refuse the same number of Republican witnesses as the number of Schiff’s witness list refused to show. Then we can start out at ground zero.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Says Sondland Never Tied Aid to Investigations
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/20...-says-sondland-never-tied-aid-investigations/

Sondland says Trump didn’t explicitly link Ukraine aid to probes

“I don’t recall President Trump ever talking with me about any security assistance,”

“The only thing we got directly from Guiliani was that the Burisma and 2016 elections were conditioned on the White House meeting,” Sondland said. “The aid was my own personal, you know, guess” based on, “two plus two equals four.”


https://www.latimes.com/politics/st...impeachment-hearing-gordon-sondland-testimony

CASE CLOSED!!
 
Yes, Zelensky stated that. What did you expect him to say, knowing that his country is dependent upon us and our military aid?

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Says Sondland Never Tied Aid to Investigations
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/20...-says-sondland-never-tied-aid-investigations/

Sondland says Trump didn’t explicitly link Ukraine aid to probes

“I don’t recall President Trump ever talking with me about any security assistance,”

“The only thing we got directly from Guiliani was that the Burisma and 2016 elections were conditioned on the White House meeting,” Sondland said. “The aid was my own personal, you know, guess” based on, “two plus two equals four.”


https://www.latimes.com/politics/st...impeachment-hearing-gordon-sondland-testimony

CASE CLOSED!!
 
There is no question to anybody that Trump is guilty of felonious and impeachable offenses.
The facts are not at issue. The facts are obvious to any capable minded person.

There are no facts to support your lie filled parroting of dumb CNN talking points.

The problem is that racist, xenophobic, misogynist, and other deplorable Americans simply don't care.
That's the quality of people we've got in this country.
A nation can't be any better than its people.

More evidence there is nothing but air between your ears. You're the face of the Democratic Party of the Jackass. ;)
 
.
You bitched about the WB because he was 2nd or 3rd hand info. Well bitch, Trump had all the first hand people refuse the subpoenas. Make up your mind, hypocrite. Which do you want?

The CONSTITUTION; READ it.


Dumb
Obsessed
Mendacious
Egotistical
Rude
76 IQ
 
Actually, there’s little to no evidence yet to come to light of any such happening.

No, of course there isn't. There there, little man. It will be okay by and by. The screaming orange man will be given a nice warm happy safe space. America will return to greatness. You'll find another conspiracy to latch on to. We promise!

Here's a nice picture for you to look at.

u2CEebx.jpg
 
.
You bitched about the WB because he was 2nd or 3rd hand info. Well bitch, Trump had all the first hand people refuse the subpoenas. Make up your mind, hypocrite. Which do you want?

What I'd like friend, is just for the republicans to have the "FAIRNESS" of catching up with the democrats on the "witness count" testifying. I'd also like the "FAIRNESS" of allowing the republicans choose their own witnesses, just like the democrats, and seeing how many of them refuse subpoenas. I friend am all about "FAIRNESS" as you can plainly see. So much so that I won't even bother to call you any names.
 
No, of course there isn't. There there, little man. It will be okay by and by. The screaming orange man will be given a nice warm happy safe space. America will return to greatness. You'll find another conspiracy to latch on to. We promise!

Here's a nice picture for you to look at.

u2CEebx.jpg

Isn't it wonderful madam how the democrats, CNN & MSNBC call a quid-pro-quo captured on a video of Joe Biden bragging about bribing a foreign government with taxpayer's money to obstruct justice by firing a foreign prosecutor because he was investigating his son HUNTER BIDEN, it's labeled a "CONSPIRACY," but when there's "ZERO" evidence of any Trump quid-pro-quo, it quickly becomes an "impeachable crime" as determined by democrats and their propaganda machine CNN & MSNBC to unseat a duly democratically elected President?
 
Does anybody know how many of the people on the republican’s witness list Adam Schiff has approved and who they are? Has Adam approved Hunter & Joe Biden? When will they appear in the Kabuki theater show? Has Adam Schiff any concept of fairness? Why would any sane and honest person believe this Pelosi/Schiff attempt to shaft Donald Trump is anything other than a third world communist style kangaroo court?

Because we already have more than enough evidence to know Trump is guilty of these crimes. TBH, I think Pelosi should have moved to impeach Trump after the Russia collusion, but she refused to. Pelosi never wanted to impeach Trump, she's not happy about what's happening now, but she knows she needs to do the right thing.
 
Back
Top