Straight Question for the Left (and Everybody Else)

IBDaMann said:
Who is the DNC's top candidate for President?
Click to expand...
That's a toughie... ATM, in terms of "most popular amongst the Team Democrat elites who choose their candidate FOR Team Democrat voters", it might be Gavin Newscum, which means that they're screwed.
IBDaMann said:
Who stands the best chance to run against Vance?
Click to expand...
In terms of "run AND WIN", it's definitely not Newscum... Coastal Elites like him are not very well received in "flyover country" (same problem that Kamala Harris had). Team Democrat would then obviously select a VP candidate from "flyover country" in order to "soften the blow", like they tried to do for Harris with Walz.

It's not AOC either... She's just plain too stupid to the core.

Pete Buttgig? :rofl2:

Josh Shapiro might be okay-enough for them, but Team Democrat can't select him because he's Jewish and that doesn't sit well with their Team Palestine constituency.

Andy Beshear might make the most sense for them. I don't think that the Team Democrat elites would ever pick him though.
IBDaMann said:
I can't think of anyone in the Democrat party with any hope. What am I not seeing?
Click to expand...
Nothing that I can tell. I don't see anyone with any hope either (out of the handful of people who I currently believe will or might run).

It will come down to whether or not Team Republican can snatch a loss from the jaws of victory (like they're historically quite adept at doing). With Vance as the candidate, that definitely wouldn't happen. With some Paul Ryan-type loser as a candidate, that would very likely happen. Thankfully, Vance currently has the "inside track".
 
Last edited:
IBDaMann said:
Has anyone in the DNC considered wooing Tulsi Gabbard back over to the Democrat party with the promise that she'll be the next Presidential nominee? She would probably beat Vance. Tulsi would win. This is why I am certain the DNC wouldn't even consider the idea.
Click to expand...
This is the correct answer. Tulsi would be a winning candidate. I would vote for Tulsi.
 
Last edited:
gfm7175 said:
This is the correct answer. Tulsi would be a winning candidate. I would vote for Tulsi.
Click to expand...
... and your a MAGAtard, so the DNC doesn't want your vote, so no Tulsi nomination.

Watch for the Democrats to push Rosa DeLauro just to spite MAGAts such as yourself.

 
IBDaMann said:
There's no misogyny, only poor candidate selection on the part of the Democrat party. The DNC deliberately selects the most repulsive and hated women as candidates. The DNC won't even consider any women such as Tulsi Gabbard who had broad, bipartisan support and who were likeable. Tulsi was also attractive, which is the kiss of death in the DNC.


... why Kamala had no chance.
Click to expand...
Where is the question?
 
IBDaMann said:
That's what you're doing. You have no idea what you are talking about and so you are desperate to wriggle out from under this topic.

This is where we stand: You cannot think for yourself. You need someone else to do your thinking for you. You are not able to even answer who you prefer; you need someone else to inform you of your preferences.
Click to expand...
“That’s what you are doing,” pretty funny, I guess the appropriate return is, “I know you are but what am I,” certainly age suitable
 
Jarod said:
Where is the question?
Click to expand...
I'll repeat it for you right here. Ignoring that the 2028 election is three years away, who, in your opinion, is the DNC's best option to defeat Vance? There are no wrong answers; I simply want your perspective.
 
archives said:
“That’s what you are doing,” pretty funny, I guess the appropriate return is, “I know you are but what am I,” certainly age suitable
Click to expand...
This amounts to continued EVASION of an otherwise easy, straightforward question. Totally unnecessary.
 
IBDaMann said:
I'll repeat it for you right here. Ignoring that the 2028 election is three years away, who, in your opinion, is the DNC's best option to defeat Vance? There are no wrong answers; I simply want your perspective.
Click to expand...
Oh, I already answered. Sorry for the confusion.
 
Team Democrat refuses to select, for their duped (and dwindling number of) supporters, any candidate who would actually have any chance of winning in 2028.

1) The most obvious and best way for Team Democrat to comfortably (and LEGITIMATELY) win in 2028 would be for them to recruit Tulsi Gabbard. However, she's a strong and beautiful woman (a no-no for them) as well as a coherent and common-sense speaker (another no-no for them). They already rejected Tulsi in 2020, so no Tulsi has "walked away" from them.

She would EASILY win if she were the Presidential nominee (she's very likeable and she appeals to a wide variety of people). If she ran as a Democrat for President in 2028, I would probably vote for her over JD Vance, mostly because of Vance's ties to Peter Thiel and Palantir (of which I'm not a fan). I'd actually, for a change, have a choice between two candidates that I generally liked. Yes, if Democrats nominated Tulsi Gabbard, then me, a "MAGAt", someone who has always voted for Republican candidates and never for a Democrat candidate, would actually probably vote for a Democrat candidate in such a case. But there's no use in continuing to ponder about things that will never actually happen.

2) For ANY sort of a chance of winning, Team Democrat would have to embrace a candidate who is from (and legitimately personifies) "flyover country". As for who would fit into that category, I have no clue. Tim Walz tried to fake it (and failed) as has outed himself as a total moron. Josh Shapiro doesn't really personify it, but he's also Jewish so he's a no-no for Team Democrat. Andy Beshear would probably be their best bet, but I really don't see him legitimately beating Vance when Vance has both the "inside track" and the "MAGA cred" (and would also get the coveted Trump endorsement). --- To be clear, I would easily vote for JD Vance over any of these people.

TLDR: ---> Team Democrat is screwed.
 
gfm7175 said:
Team Democrat refuses to select, for their duped (and dwindling number of) supporters, any candidate who would actually have any chance of winning in 2028.
Click to expand...
Really? I didn't know 2028 had come and gone! Someone better make all my house payments for the past 3.5 years!
gfm7175 said:
1) The most obvious and best way for Team Democrat to comfortably (and LEGITIMATELY) win in 2028 would be for them to recruit Tulsi Gabbard. However, she's a strong and beautiful woman (a no-no for them) as well as a coherent and common-sense speaker (another no-no for them). They already rejected Tulsi in 2020, so no Tulsi has "walked away" from them.
Click to expand...
Gabbard has already established herself as a soulless mercenary willing to say or do anything to curry favor with MAGA. Nope, our next candidate will be a celebrity. Sit the fuck down Rahm fucking Emanuel - your time has come and gone. We're running Mark Cuban!
gfm7175 said:
She would EASILY win if she were the Presidential nominee (she's very likeable and she appeals to a wide variety of people). If she ran as a Democrat for President in 2028, I would probably vote for her over JD Vance, mostly because of Vance's ties to Peter Thiel and Palantir (of which I'm not a fan). I'd actually, for a change, have a choice between two candidates that I generally liked. Yes, if Democrats nominated Tulsi Gabbard, then me, a "MAGAt", someone who has always voted for Republican candidates and never for a Democrat candidate, would actually probably vote for a Democrat candidate in such a case. But there's no use in continuing to ponder about things that will never actually happen.
Click to expand...
Not a chance. She's a nut.
gfm7175 said:
2) For ANY sort of a chance of winning, Team Democrat would have to embrace a candidate who is from (and legitimately personifies) "flyover country". As for who would fit into that category, I have no clue. Tim Walz tried to fake it (and failed) as has outed himself as a total moron. Josh Shapiro doesn't really personify it, but he's also Jewish so he's a no-no for Team Democrat. Andy Beshear would probably be their best bet, but I really don't see him legitimately beating Vance when Vance has both the "inside track" and the "MAGA cred" (and would also get the coveted Trump endorsement). --- To be clear, I would easily vote for JD Vance over any of these people.

TLDR: ---> Team Democrat is screwed.
Click to expand...
TLDR ---> You see trump's dwindling ratings - the fact the effects of the "BBB" are going to be felt in that very "heartland" you've described and then it is you who will be screwed, McDuck!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top