Tea Party Sustainability

Lowaicue said:
Aaah, more simplistic solutions from simple minds.
Why dont you just get rid of your government completely. That would mean all government from national through state to county (do you have county government?). Lets follow it through. Get rid of all authority.
Well, fat yanks would certainly lose weight. No roads and no bridges so you'd do a whole lot of walking. No millie-dairy so anyone could invade and eliminate you (before Sarah Plain does it for you). No police, no firemen, no prisons, no jobs.
Yup, sounds just about what you deserve. Mud tracks and donkeys! Give me a yee-hahhhhhhh! or would that be an Eee-aw?
Click to expand...

Oh yes, one of those small minded individuals who thinks that we're in anarchy if the governments not telling you where to crap and making sure you wipe your ass correctly.

You have a very small minded post Lowaicue.

I can just see you in the rice field posting your best educated comments with the intent of making a point.
 
Rana said:
I have to laugh and disagree, he would beat McCain, again! McCain has destroyed he credibility, he is starting to show signs of alzheimers. He changes his mind almost as often as his underwear!
Click to expand...

I totally dislike McCain, and would hate to see him as President.

But I would bet money on what I said.
 
Liberty said:
Oh yes, one of those small minded individuals who thinks that we're in anarchy if the governments not telling you where to crap and making sure you wipe your ass correctly.

You have a very small minded post Lowaicue.

I can just see you in the rice field posting your best educated comments with the intent of making a point.
Click to expand...

Mmm. Note to self.
Satire and sarcasm don't work with Americans.
Ee-aww
 
It just doesn't matter. Tea Baggers or not, nothing will change other than pace at which the redistribution of wealth from the bottom to the top continues. Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Communists, Socialists or whatever-ists, it just doesn't matter. Even if the Tea Baggers manage to avoid the pitfalls of corruption that the massive inflow of corporate/special interest cash traditionally engenders it still won't matter. The poor will stay poor, the middle class will continue to die and the top ten percent who own 90% of our nations wealth will continue to suck up the last few pennies. I do have to admit though that I get a kick out of how the Tea-Baggers like to scream "socialism!" when it's about the wealth being redistributed from the top down but it's just good old capitalism when it goes the other way around. A socialized upper class, what a hoot.

Call me a cynic but it looks to me like the game is rigged and not in our favor. We can scream and we can yell and we can vote until the cows come home but it's not going to make a damn bit of difference. With Reagan the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, same with Bush, same with Clinton, same with Bush II and now it's the same with Obama.

To quote a line from a favorite movie of mine: "...even if every man woman and child held hands together and prayed for us to win, it just wouldn't matter because all the really good looking girls would still go out with the guys from Mohawk because they've got all the money!"

Ciao

Russ
 
Rana said:
I have to laugh and disagree, he would beat McCain, again! McCain has destroyed he credibility, he is starting to show signs of alzheimers. He changes his mind almost as often as his underwear!
Click to expand...
Abraham Lincoln himself would have lost to Obama in 08 after 8 years of the catastrophe that was W.
 
Russellbor said:
It just doesn't matter. Tea Baggers or not, nothing will change other than pace at which the redistribution of wealth from the bottom to the top continues. Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Communists, Socialists or whatever-ists, it just doesn't matter. Even if the Tea Baggers manage to avoid the pitfalls of corruption that the massive inflow of corporate/special interest cash traditionally engenders it still won't matter. The poor will stay poor, the middle class will continue to die and the top ten percent who own 90% of our nations wealth will continue to suck up the last few pennies. I do have to admit though that I get a kick out of how the Tea-Baggers like to scream "socialism!" when it's about the wealth being redistributed from the top down but it's just good old capitalism when it goes the other way around. A socialized upper class, what a hoot.

Call me a cynic but it looks to me like the game is rigged and not in our favor. We can scream and we can yell and we can vote until the cows come home but it's not going to make a damn bit of difference. With Reagan the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, same with Bush, same with Clinton, same with Bush II and now it's the same with Obama.

To quote a line from a favorite movie of mine: "...even if every man woman and child held hands together and prayed for us to win, it just wouldn't matter because all the really good looking girls would still go out with the guys from Mohawk because they've got all the money!"

Ciao

Russ
Click to expand...





http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/even-more-gilded/


Russ look at this chart , things are better under dems.
 
evince said:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/even-more-gilded/


Russ look at this chart , things are better under dems.
Click to expand...

saez07.png


This just demonstrates socialism by democrats, nothing more.
 
Liberty said:
It's not going to take much to get rid of Obama. I bet that peice of crap McCain could win against him at this point.

Tea Party or not.

People are waking up to the ills of big gov't.
Click to expand...
You're deluding your self. If Repubulicans nominate a hard right candidate, like Hucakbee, or one of questionable qualifications, like Palin, Obama will hand Republicans their ass. The question is can a competant and qualified Republican who is not out there on the lunatic fringe get the Republican nomination? The only candidate I see that they have who can beat Obama at this stage is Romney. I seriously doubt that Romney will play well out in mouth breather land, though I think he'd make an excellent candidate.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
You're deluding your self. If Repubulicans nominate a hard right candidate, like Hucakbee, or one of questionable qualifications, like Palin, Obama will hand Republicans their ass. The question is can a competant and qualified Republican who is not out there on the lunatic fringe get the Republican nomination? The only candidate I see that they have who can beat Obama at this stage is Romney. I seriously doubt that Romney will play well out in mouth breather land, though I think he'd make an excellent candidate.
Click to expand...

Obama has shit on so many people that I don't think he will win the dem nomination. He's a cancer and the dems know it.
 
AnyOldIron said:
To answer the initial question with a question....

How long can semi-literate righteous indignation last?
Click to expand...
It depends on if they can focus on the Debt over the religious aspects of supposed conservatism. If the religious radicals are allowed to take over the movement then it will die. People who are not "semi-literate" and worried about debt and who understand that debt will drive taxation are a good thing, people who think that homosexuals getting married will end all civilization, not so much.

The Hugh Jidette ads might give it some legs in the right direction.

http://oweno.com/
 
Mott the Hoople said:
You're deluding your self. If Repubulicans nominate a hard right candidate, like Hucakbee, or one of questionable qualifications, like Palin, Obama will hand Republicans their ass. The question is can a competant and qualified Republican who is not out there on the lunatic fringe get the Republican nomination? The only candidate I see that they have who can beat Obama at this stage is Romney. I seriously doubt that Romney will play well out in mouth breather land, though I think he'd make an excellent candidate.
Click to expand...
Huckabee? Hard right? You sir are delusional. Huckabee is a religious populist at best.
 
No, because his policies don't involve religion. For libtards, the fact that a man believes in God makes him right-wing.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
You wouldn't consider a religious populist "hard right"?
Click to expand...
No. I wouldn't. Now, had his past policies been about fiscal conservatism rather than populism you might have a point. Or if he believed in smaller government even when it came to his populist stances. Neither of those are the case. Huckabee isn't "hard right" by any stretch of the imagination.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top