Then it's time to ban public schools as your anecdote makes clear that teachers can not be trusted with children.
Teachers & Guns? Seriously?
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
Then it's time to ban public schools as your anecdote makes clear that teachers can not be trusted with children.
You would love that wouldn’t you, ban public education.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Then and now....
@realDonaldTrump....If a potential “sicko shooter” knows that a school has a large number of very weapons talented teachers (and others) who will be instantly shooting, the sicko will NEVER attack that school. Cowards won’t go there...problem solved. Must be offensive, defense alone won’t work!Donald J. TrumpVerified account
@realDonaldTrump
....History shows that a school shooting lasts, on average, 3 minutes. It takes police & first responders approximately 5 to 8 minutes to get to site of crime. Highly trained, gun adept, teachers/coaches would solve the problem instantly, before police arrive. GREAT DETERRENT!
@realDonaldTrump
....immediately fire back if a savage sicko came to a school with bad intentions. Highly trained teachers would also serve as a deterrent to the cowards that do this. Far more assets at much less cost than guards. A “gun free” school is a magnet for bad people. ATTACKS WOULD END!
@realDonaldTrump....If a potential “sicko shooter” knows that a school has a large number of very weapons talented teachers (and others) who will be instantly shooting, the sicko will NEVER attack that school. Cowards won’t go there...problem solved. Must be offensive, defense alone won’t work!Donald J. TrumpVerified account
@realDonaldTrump
....History shows that a school shooting lasts, on average, 3 minutes. It takes police & first responders approximately 5 to 8 minutes to get to site of crime. Highly trained, gun adept, teachers/coaches would solve the problem instantly, before police arrive. GREAT DETERRENT!
@realDonaldTrump
....immediately fire back if a savage sicko came to a school with bad intentions. Highly trained teachers would also serve as a deterrent to the cowards that do this. Far more assets at much less cost than guards. A “gun free” school is a magnet for bad people. ATTACKS WOULD END!
That guy is such a fucking idiot, he will say anything the NRA tells him to say. Just five or six years ago the Dude supported a ban on assault rifle’s.
hvilleherb
Verified User
This should have been done years ago. Teachers should be required to complete conceal carry training before they can start coursework for a masters degree.
MAGA!
MAGA!
The Bible. Matthew 10:26 ".....For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known". No. 1 ST. LOUIS MO. 2. BALTIMORE MARYLAND 3. DETROIT MICHIGAN, No surprises thus far. Next comes New Orleans La. then Cleveland Oh. then comes Newark New J. followed by Memphis Tn. before Chicago gets in line (but I did enjoy the method of accounting to get Chicago out of the top spot.....they measured murders PER CAPITA instead of just counting the dead on the streets). Kansas City is next, then Atlanta Ga. Milwaukee Wis. follows with Oakland and Cincy virtually tied.
Of source these numbers are skewed due to the accounting method of using Per Capita instead of just reporting the murders....as if it matters how many targets are needed before one gets murdered by the criminals who did not follow the gun regulations in those cities.
What do these cities have in common? They are run by democrats. www.truthrevolt.org/news/democrats-run-highest-crime-cities-america
Restricting gun rights in these cities so the innocent could not have access to self protection worked? Really? Now we know where this old axiom comes from "The difinition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results." Progressive my ass.
Last edited:
Adding guns into the equation is not going to solve the gun problem. Removing guns from the situation however will. By providing teachers with guns it opens up more opportunities for exploitation, than anything advantageous. The role of a teacher is to educate, not defend.
You're the one promoting the idea that teachers can not be trusted with the safety of the children dipshit.
Ah I see disarming the law abiding populace will prevent crime, brilliant! You see people for these anti-Constitutional fascists it is not about actually having safer schools it is about banning guns. All guns.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
This is going to be a great issue for exposing the left for their gun grabbing ways. This will be like DACA for the left. Trump will crush them.
With DACA the said “amnesty or nothing” while Trump put out reasonable proposals after another.
Trump will play the democrats the same way on this. He will offer up many things just short of banning guns and the democrat party true to form will say NO. We only want banning of the 2nd Amendment.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
With DACA the said “amnesty or nothing” while Trump put out reasonable proposals after another.
Trump will play the democrats the same way on this. He will offer up many things just short of banning guns and the democrat party true to form will say NO. We only want banning of the 2nd Amendment.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Of course it will. Australia, Japan, India, Germany, UK, New Zealand are living examples, as too are many more countries. It may be a right in your Constitution (where in fact interpretation is up for debate) however this is more relating to ones morals. How can you as an individual carry a weapon, that in fact has the primary purpose to kill??
So you believe that removing or at least more strictly legislating firearms will do nothing??
If a country has a drug crisis, you do not add more drugs to the equation, you remove the drugs from the equation.
Anti-Constitutional......fascists????
I cannot help but also point this notion out relating to the 14th Amendment. It states "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws" The laws pertaining to firearms and the use of firearms are depriving individuals of their right to life. The final line terming "equal protection", appears to be failing. How a gunman who is awaiting trial and innocent teenagers and kids who have passed (along with their families) are receiving equal protection is beyond my intelligence.
I have heard few Americans stand up for the 14th Amendment but so many for the 2nd Amendment, why is this because guns seem to be valued more than justice, protection and life. The 2nd Amendment is merely an excuse to cover the United States hideous gun culture, if you deny this I would assert you look past the 2nd Amendment and onto the news, the true events and heck maybe even the 14th Amendment.
That is some crazy shit...
It is something to quite simply respond with simple answers, however they portray no meaning nor negation of what I stated......
You deny other countries have had success with gun laws???
You deny their is a problem pertaining to firearms in the USA??
You deny the 2nd Amendment is currently contradicting the 14th Amendment???
Don't reply if you cannot at least respond with some intellectual capacity.
Ok. For starters, how is my owning and use of firearms "depriving individuals of their right to life"?
I never stipulated it was 'you', rather the Constitutional right is what is allowing the firearms to be utilised and thus attribute to 64% of homicides. How can you continue to carry a weapon that has murdered many innocent lives?? Guns are not a normality, rather they seem to have been conditioned as a normality, an obsession.
Was it not a human with a gun (a human bearing arms) that has conducted the mass shootings???
My "Constitutional right" does not allow anyone to break any laws. Please show us where it does.
Not one of my firearms "has murdered many innocent lives." How on earth can you make such a misleading statement?
Guns have always been a "normality" in this country, for both protection and for hunting.
"Was it not a human with a gun (a human bearing arms) that has conducted the mass shootings??? "
That's a stupid question! Of course it was, a human who broke a number of existing laws.
moon
Satire for Sanity
So you say- but you sound like a drive-in sniper. Take your word for it ? You gun-men are immoral by default.
If you won't give them up then we'll take them legally. There's no other solution and you're going to have to accept that.
The Constitutional right gives you the right to own and thus use a firearms. The failure of the Constitutional right, weak firearm legislation in the US and the commonality and normality of guns is what allowed the perpetrators of the hundreds of mass shootings to abuse the right, has allowed individuals to kill 11,000 in homicide related violence, it has allowed an average of 96 Americans to be killed per day by a gun and it has allowed 50 woman a month to be shot by their partners.
A misleading statement....are you not carrying a gun, similar or not identical to the one that has been used to kill an innocent victim???? I never stated that particular weapon you were carrying killed anyone, far reaching implication that is blaming me of accusing you to be a murderer. Guns primary purpose is to take life, is this not true????
For protection....well if the US removed or at least heavily regulated on firearms you wouldn't have to defend yourself against anyone with a firearm. For every 1 person who acted in self defence 34 more people die. Of all the homicides from 2003-2011 only 0.79% of individuals defended themselves or at least threatened to defend themselves with a firearm. Merely an accuse when mass shootings are happening in Las Vegas, Miami, Orlando etc...
Hunting is something that I don't agree with, however I accept it is part of individuals jobs or lifestyle.
Australia is a clear example of a country with effective gun law, deny this you deny there hasn't been a mass shooting or a drop in homicide rates, youth suicide rates or gun violence. However they are highly regulated with a ban on a majority of firearms, strict containment laws, lengthy background checks, ongoing inspection of licensed gun shops, limitations on ages of attaining a gun license. Individuals are still allowed to hunt. Why can't the US follow this example??
A drive-in sniper? What the Sam hell is that?
You'll take them? Come and get em'. Just keep in mind, my colleagues say I'm a damn good shot. Start practicing...