The ruling is only 7 pages long. The pages have a large font and are double spaced. Two of the pages only have 2 sentences or less. The ruling is less than 1300 words long.
And you couldn't find the quote?

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block the battleground states from casting "unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes" in the Electoral College.
BY EMMA PLATOFF DEC. 8, 2020
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/12/08/texas-ken-paxton-election-georgia/
Ken Paxton is a joke. He’s got legal troubles of his own.
See, the problem with this is that making bad faith arguments isn't going to translate to more support at the polls.
If you tell your followers that the vote is rigged, they're not going to vote.
Derp.
If signatures can not be authenticated and verified, it is an illegitimate, rigged election.
Provide the quote or STFU, Goober.
Why is Ken Paxton only suing the states that Trump lost?????????????????????????
Trump is very prescient man.![]()
Good, then you have no problem if the signatures are checked again.![]()
Then you're aware that lots of people on both sides have argued, for a very long time, that our election process is not secure.
As long as the media is covering it (it gives them good stories and ratings) and the people are discussing it and social media is filled with it I think it has served its desired purpose. Any legal wins are just unexpected extras.
--media attention
--$500 million+ raised for "legal defense" going to campaign debt and Trump's PAC
--reinforces partisan division and support for each side in elections and fundraising
--pushes the Trump "brand"
""... Brickman alleges she also observed a number of other irregularities, like failure to correctly match signatures.
“Signature verification standards were constantly being lowered by supervisors in order to move more quickly and process the higher amount of early and mail-in ballots,” said Brickman.
“From the 15 points of similarities reduced to a minimum of three, lowered to one, and ultimately none.”
Brickman recalled that she was told to just pass each signature verification through.
She questioned the integrity of what she reportedly observed, stating “this is not the way an election should be run.”
She also said ballots were passed through even though signatures on the envelope did not match the signature or even the name on the ballot. She says she witnessed different ballots allegedly showing the same handwriting on the envelopes."
https://www.ntd.com/trump-ballots-switched-to-biden-testimony_534878.html
There are hundreds of very similar stories from a just a few key counties. Just the testimony of dozens adds up to over 700,000 improperly processed votes in Maricopa and Pima counties. And there is similar evidentiary testimony involving over 800,000 votes in Pa..
This will be interesting. If the Supremens don't hear this case then Texas will have a very good reason to secede. How many states will join them?
I can't find your quotes anywhere.
So how many signatures did these two experts examine and authenticate?
sig matching varies from state to state and by voter roll or application for absentee
GA has 1 person ding the matching ( or maybe that was PA)
clearly national standards are needed to provide equal protection
That's what I said.
So how many signatures did these two experts examine and authenticate?
We can hope thats what they do in GA.