Texas sues Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania over election fraud

sig matching varies from state to state and by voter roll or application for absentee

GA has 1 person ding the matching ( or maybe that was PA)

clearly national standards are needed to provide equal protection
 
The ruling is only 7 pages long. The pages have a large font and are double spaced. Two of the pages only have 2 sentences or less. The ruling is less than 1300 words long.

And you couldn't find the quote?

That's what I said. :dunno:

So how many signatures did these two experts examine and authenticate?
 
See, the problem with this is that making bad faith arguments isn't going to translate to more support at the polls.

If you tell your followers that the vote is rigged, they're not going to vote.

Derp.

We can hope thats what they do in GA.
 
Sounds like another winning strategy to me.
These guys are on a roll.
Bring on the drunk blonde again...her work isn't done.
 
As long as the media is covering it (it gives them good stories and ratings) and the people are discussing it and social media is filled with it I think it has served its desired purpose. Any legal wins are just unexpected extras.

--media attention
--$500 million+ raised for "legal defense" going to campaign debt and Trump's PAC
--reinforces partisan division and support for each side in elections and fundraising
--pushes the Trump "brand"

The money he is raising now is going to his defense in NY.
 
""... Brickman alleges she also observed a number of other irregularities, like failure to correctly match signatures.

“Signature verification standards were constantly being lowered by supervisors in order to move more quickly and process the higher amount of early and mail-in ballots,” said Brickman.


“From the 15 points of similarities reduced to a minimum of three, lowered to one, and ultimately none.”

Brickman recalled that she was told to just pass each signature verification through.

She questioned the integrity of what she reportedly observed, stating “this is not the way an election should be run.”

She also said ballots were passed through even though signatures on the envelope did not match the signature or even the name on the ballot. She says she witnessed different ballots allegedly showing the same handwriting on the envelopes."

https://www.ntd.com/trump-ballots-switched-to-biden-testimony_534878.html

There are hundreds of very similar stories from a just a few key counties. Just the testimony of dozens adds up to over 700,000 improperly processed votes in Maricopa and Pima counties. And there is similar evidentiary testimony involving over 800,000 votes in Pa..

Tough shit, Biden is your next president. don't like it then eat shit, nobody cares.
 
This will be interesting. If the Supremens don't hear this case then Texas will have a very good reason to secede. How many states will join them?

Well then the Texas militias better start warming up cause the Supreme Court won’t touch the case for the same obvious reasons, the accusations are short on actual evidence
 
sig matching varies from state to state and by voter roll or application for absentee

GA has 1 person ding the matching ( or maybe that was PA)

clearly national standards are needed to provide equal protection

Easy, if the vote was for Biden then the signatures matched. If it was a trump vote we threw it out. Don't like that then eat shit, don't care.
 
We can hope thats what they do in GA.

Some interesting news out of Georgia...1.1 million people have requested absentee ballots including 70,000 new voters aged 18-29...for the November election, 1.3M had requested ballots.

They don't break out by party affiliation but it would seem that most of them are Democrats since they dominated the absentee voting in the General.
 
Back
Top